According to the modeling group led by William Nordhaus, a Yale professor widely considered to be the world's leading expert on this kind of assessment, an optimally designed and
implemented global carbon tax would provide an expected net benefit of around $ 3 trillion, or about 0.2 percent of the present value of global GDP over the next several centuries.
Not exact matches
If you're concerned about a further delay in devising and
implementing a
carbon tax, well it's an ill wind that blows us all some good there in the form of a
global recession / depression.
If Obama really wants to make a lasting impact on
global warming, he can work across the aisle or across the Pacific in Beijing, to work toward
implementing a meaningful, economy - wide
carbon tax as quickly as possible.
I believe the president's meme on
global warming is being used to
implement a
carbon tax.
I suggest there is no credible evidence that
carbon taxes will succeed in achieving
global GHG emissions reductions, but they will damage the economies that
implement them and, therefore, will reduce well - being and make those economies less able to afford effective policies.
These are:
Implement a «
carbon tax» (or make polluters pay); impose really tough emission standards; create a secure
global trade regime in low
carbon fuels; develop ways of financing the transfer of the best available technology for creating and, more importantly, saving energy; and require governments to invest in research and early - stage innovation.