And if we calculate current policies including subsidies to renewables as
implicit taxes on carbon then in many if not not most cases it would imply there should be no additional carbon tax at all.
Not exact matches
These measures include levying a price
on carbon emissions, eliminating
tax subsidies for fossil fuels and ending
implicit subsidies, such as leasing federal lands that contain coal or oil at rates below the fair market rate.
If the SCC can be shown to be negative at current levels of abatement (and bear in mind that your excellent chart of net benefits for various abatement paths refers to benefits relative to the 2010 policy stance) then I'd be content to freeze policy at current levels but to steadily transfer all policies to a
carbon tax, or at least to cost them
on a common basis, ie to treat renewable subsidies as
implicit carbon taxes.
Thus the new
carbon tax represents an
implicit tax increase
on workers and investors.