Consensus
implies general agreement, though not necessarily unanimity.»
Not exact matches
As there was no express
agreement as to price, the contractor argued there was an
implied term to pay
general supervision of $ 12,000 per month for the extras, because that sum was a component of the fixed price contract, which governed the original scope of work.
For a
general agency
agreement, ie one which does not contemplate limiting the seller to using only one agent, a term would generally be
implied into the contract requiring that the agent «effectively cause» sale: if the agent does not cause sale, they will not be entitled to their commission (see Dashwood v Fleurets Limited [2007] EWHC 1610 (QB), [2007] All ER (D) 67 (Jul)-RRB-.
Under the following section of the Consent
Agreement, it seems to
imply that the Consent
Agreement isn't applicable to the individual Provinces, and if such is the case, it could explain why all the Provinces weren't mentioned in the Consent
Agreement, under VI
General 14: