When the particles are large,
it implies less surface area for that cholesterol to be oxidized (which is when cholesterol really becomes problematic and contributes to CVD).
Not exact matches
This lower - intensity rainfall
implies less runoff over the
surface, which means we should see a decline in runoff over a whole basin.
Yes, such processes involve redistribution of heat, but heat redistributed from or to ocean depths to the
surface would affect global temperatures at these time scales, whereas (as you
imply) geographical redistribution at the
surface would not (or at least much
less).
I found it to be in the model ball park (perhaps a bit larger, actually) which
implied a large warming bias in the
surface data, a large cooling bias in the satellite data, some
less large combination of those two, or an unknown real climactic effect on lapse rate variation that only operates on the long term and is absent from current models: