Sadly, this proposal eliminates several
important Federal education programs.
Not exact matches
Schools Chancellor Dennis M. Walcott and UFT President Michael Mulgrew on July 15 announced an
important agreement that will help secure up to $ 65 million over the next two years in
federal School Improvement Grants, a U.S. Department of
Education program that provides funding to help transform our nation's struggling schools.
As
federal, state, and local budgets potentially respond to Endrew F. and state and local pressures, it is
important to remember that these increased supports for general
education require funding — so transferring spending out of the general
program to specific services clearly identifiable as benefiting solely students with disabilities could backfire.
While eliminating applications raises questions for
important aspects of the largest
federal K - 12
education aid
program, the ESEA Title I
program, the policy guidance published by USED in March 2015 provides a wide range of options for states and LEAs to implement CEP with minimal interference with Title I funding allocations or accountability measures.
Implementation of CEP by LEAs and schools has
important implications for the largest
federal K - 12
education program — Education for the Disadvantaged under Title I, Part A, of the Elementary and Secondary Education Ac
education program —
Education for the Disadvantaged under Title I, Part A, of the Elementary and Secondary Education Ac
Education for the Disadvantaged under Title I, Part A, of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Ac
Education Act (ESEA).
Policies that promote school integration by race and class took a significant hit last week when the U.S. Department of
Education announced that it was killing a small but
important federal program to support local diversity efforts.
The omnibus bill also includes funding increases for other
federal education programs important to principals, as well as additional resources for training to address school violence and for improving mental health services in schools.
While good in theory, SES had many implementation problems, 12 including low participation rates and lack of quality control.13 In some districts, there were scandals involving providers overcharging districts, hiring tutors with criminal records, or violating
federal regulations.14 In all districts, SES siphoned off Title I funds, leaving less for other
important Title I
programs.15 The tutoring
program was eventually phased out as the Department of
Education began implementing «ESEA Flexibility,» 16 also known as waivers, and it was scrapped all together under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA).17
Eliminating
programs that support physical
education, arts
education, school counselors, school leadership, and the Teaching American History
program indicates that these
important activities that promote healthy, safe, engaged, supported, and challenged students are no longer a
federal priority.
These changes mark an
important step toward Planned Parenthood's goal of eliminating
federal funding of dangerous abstinence - only
programs and expanding access to comprehensive, medically accurate sex
education.