Policies that use standardized test scores as the most
important accountability measure for schools, teachers or students, and / or expand the use of standardized testing in our schools.
However, far from a «Wild West» approach to charter oversight, his organization instead advocated for, and got,
important accountability measures included in the law: mandatory closure for persistently low - performing charter schools, A — F grading of schools (both charter and public), and an end to so - called «authorizer shopping,» in which failing schools move to a new authorizer after their existing one withdraws its support.
Not exact matches
Shareholder Proposals on Information Requests Only Shareholder proposals have rightly played an
important role in prodding companies both to adopt governance
measures and to disclose campaign spending, often following a model developed by the Center for Political
Accountability.
We expect many of the concepts associated with NPM such as active management, public
accountability through performance
measures, and a strong focus on cost, will remain
important for some time to come.
«As financial incentives change in the U.S. health care system, valid
measures of care quality are increasingly
important for ensuring transparency and
accountability.
Because some states are experimenting with value - added approaches to
measuring school progress, it's
important that federal
accountability standards allow for this type of innovation.
Critical for
measures of soft skills used for
accountability is that they not be easily gamed and that they reflect outcomes that are
important.
Too many states try to include too many
measures into their
accountability system, and then none of the individual
measures are really
important or really guide schools on what their learning outcomes need to be.
It would make matters more difficult because the most
important flaw of the No Child Left Behind
accountability system is its reliance on the level of student achievement at a single point in time as a
measure of school performance.
Children's education and well - being are being treated as less valuable and
important than
accountability measures.
While eliminating applications raises questions for
important aspects of the largest federal K - 12 education aid program, the ESEA Title I program, the policy guidance published by USED in March 2015 provides a wide range of options for states and LEAs to implement CEP with minimal interference with Title I funding allocations or
accountability measures.
While elements such as state standards,
accountability measures, and value added
measures are gaining acceptance, other
important components, especially performance - based pay and increased choice options, are opposed by powerful forces — such as the politically connected teachers unions — with vested interests in the current system.
At the same time,
important questions have been raised about the suitability of extant
measures of non-cognitive skills, most of which rely on asking students to assess their own abilities, for
accountability purposes.
Yet
important questions have been raised about the suitability of extant
measures of non-cognitive skills, most of which rely on asking students to assess their own abilities, for
accountability purposes.
«A «dashboard»
accountability system will include
important information about school and student performance, but it is unclear how it will be
measured and incorporated into an overall
measure of school quality.»
Assessment information used in
accountability must focus on those areas deemed most
important, not only those areas that are easiest to
measure with inexpensive tools, such as standardized tests, though such tools have a place in the
accountability process.
«Proficiency» is an
important measure and marker, and is a logical place to focus
accountability efforts.
While ESSA required states to add in a couple of additional outcome
measures of students and schools, the overwhelming weight of
accountability is still upon a single standardized test by which to make
important and often high - stakes judgments about students, schools, and districts.
The pendulum swing toward, and now away, from high - stakes test
accountability in
measuring educational progress «taught us all that balance is
important.
We believe it is
important for school leaders, in the context of an
accountability measure, to know that there is as much consistency as possible across schools.
For instance, university researchers at the Stanford University Graduate School of Education's John W. Gardner Center recently partnered with the California CORE districts — which include the Los Angeles Unified, Oakland Unified, Fresno Unified, Long Beach Unified, Santa Ana Unified, Sanger Unified, Garden Grove Unified, and Sacramento City Unified school districts — to design a new local school
accountability system that included
measures of students» social - emotional learning, growth mindset, self - efficacy, and school climate.51 Researchers found that these
measures were predictive of students» test performance and correlated with other
important academic and behavioral outcomes.52
State departments of education play an
important role in defining expectations for students; how those expectations are
measured; and how information is used to identify, intervene, and support schools and districts as part of a coherent and «reciprocal» system of
accountability.
While educators and policymakers agree that multiple
measures over multiple years are the best way to gauge student, school, and district performance, the first - year SBAC results provide an
important baseline for assessing implementation of the Common Core State Standards and the Local Control and
Accountability Plans (LCAPs).
While college - degree - earning rates may be
important, the longer - lasting and still barely noticed development here is the declaration by the KIPPs, Uncommons, Achievement Firsts, YES Preps, and other networks across the country that earning college degrees should be the ultimate
accountability measure for their high schools.
ESSA also marks an
important move toward a more holistic approach to
accountability by encouraging multiple
measures of school and student success.
If assessments are going to be used as
accountability measures, reliability (the degree to which a test can be depended on to produce consistent results repeatedly), and validity (the extent to which a test accurately
measures the result that it is intended to
measure), become critically
important.
We hope the national spotlight on Chicago's schools refocuses the nation's attention on building connections between schools, parents and communities, backing research - based reforms and beginning the
important pushback on damaging practices such as high - stakes testing, school closings, and flawed teacher
accountability measures.
Accountability systems: Approximately 25 % of public school teachers who left the profession in 2012 reported that dissatisfaction with the influence of school assessment and accountability measures on their teaching or curriculum was extremely or very important in their deci
Accountability systems: Approximately 25 % of public school teachers who left the profession in 2012 reported that dissatisfaction with the influence of school assessment and
accountability measures on their teaching or curriculum was extremely or very important in their deci
accountability measures on their teaching or curriculum was extremely or very
important in their decision to leave.
Though the work with the Texas High Performance Schools Consortium, College Station ISD has constructed a meaningful
accountability system that
measures what this community believes is
important.
Historically, school
accountability systems in the United States tend to start
measuring success at 3rd grade, though children begin developing critical language, literacy, and foundational content knowledge long before they reach this all -
important turning point.
Appropriate
accountability measures are
important not only for NTRBs, but for all bodies in receipt of public monies.
«While we conclude that
measures of students» social - emotional learning should not be considered as a stand - alone indicator in federal
accountability systems at this time,
measures of school climate can provide
important insights into how schools are supporting SEL.»