Sentences with phrase «important appeal in the case»

Apple is still waiting for the results of the most important appeal in the case, the one that basically seeks to overturn the first ruling against them.

Not exact matches

In some cases this appeal to inner intuition might take the form of the claim that each of us has a «non-sensuous experience of the self» which is «both prior to our interpretation of our sense - knowledge and more important as source for the more fundamental questions of the meaning of our human experience as human selves» (BRO 75).

(Most recently, the D.C. Court of Appeals issued an important but nuanced ruling in what Religion Clause's Howard Friedman calls the government's test case, Gilardi v. HHS.)

Russell's appeal to this common practice, however, begs the important question of how, in his case, the necessary «correspondence» among different points in the different observers» perceptual spaces is to be ascertained.

This is such a truism that one is almost ashamed to pen the words, and yet it remains a fact that, in a great deal of the more conservative biblical scholarship, it does seem to be assumed that the appeal to factual accuracy would he as valid and important a factor in the case of ancient Near Eastern religious texts as it would be in a modern western court of law or in a somewhat literally - minded western congregation.

According to Adamson, the case that Plotinus is the third most important thinker in western philosophy goes like this: «He fused together the doctrines he claimed to find in Plato with many of Aristotle's ideas, along with a healthy dose of Stoicism,» which was so appealing that it could be «embraced by pagans in the Roman Empire, by Christians in Byzantium and Western Europe, and Christians, Jews, and Muslims who lived in the Islamic Empire and wrote in Syriac, Arabic, Persian, and Hebrew.»

He attempted to enforce clerical celibacy, forbade pluralism, (the holding of two or more church offices and drawing the income from them), endeavored to exclude lay interference in ecclesiastical affairs, affirmed the right of Rome to review important cases under canon law and thus increased appeals to the Holy See, ordered that tithes for the support of the Church be given precedence over all other taxes, and took vigorous measures for the suppression of heresy.

For example, an absolute threshold in the number of votes (e.g. requiring a certain proportion of the whole population or of registered voters to be elected rather than a plurality of the vote) can seem intuitively appealing but has never, to my knowledge, been implemented for a national election, precisely because leaving an important office unfilled is a problem (unless, of course, you subscribe to radical small - government ideas, in which case the question seems moot and you might just as well do away with elections or democracy itself).

They now have an opportunity to share collections of images, infographics, important stats, and even case studies in a visually appealing format.

Court of Appeals makes an important ruling in a gender restroom case.

That is why it is important to sue the IRS, in cases of disagreement, in the US Tax Court before the assessment becomes final: it delays the final assessment until the case is decided, while when appealing in the District court - you already owe the money and the government can proceed with levies and garnishment while the court takes its time.

It is important to note that the decision in a federal court of appeals is not binding on the cases that are outside of its circuit — there are 13 different federal court of appeals circuits.

In any case, it is Capcom's turn to analyze how could they not appeal to a large number of people using one of the most important brands in the entertainment industry at the momenIn any case, it is Capcom's turn to analyze how could they not appeal to a large number of people using one of the most important brands in the entertainment industry at the momenin the entertainment industry at the moment.

But while some indie games can appeal to a broad audience, a lot of them are niches within a niche, and in those cases it's all the more important to find a way in the trailer to say to that niche: «I see you, and I understand what you like.»

This simplifying of the standard of review, and the important role of prothonotaries in the Federal Court generally and in intellectual property cases will make appeals more straightforward.

He has handled more than 30 cases in Courts of Appeals in a variety of areas important to businesses, including antitrust, class certification, false advertising, environmental regulation, intellectual property, ERISA, health care, and communications.

The case, O'Malley v. Soske, Appeals Court No. 09 - P - 315, (March 31, 2010), is an important reminder of the intent of the legislature when the statute was amended in 1988.

An appeal court in New York has issued an important ruling on the issue of whether a woman who relocates to another state while she is pregnant is barred from having a future custody case being heard in the new location.

He has particular experience of cases concerning the ECHR, and has appeared in many of the most important such cases in recent years including the recent appeals to the Supreme Court in Hesham Ali, MM (Lebanon), Agyarko and Kiarie & Byndloss.

Further, the draftsman clearly drew a very important difference between «an appeal... on any point of law» in s 204 (1) and «the principles that are applied by the court on an application for judicial review» in s 204A (4) by using those different terms for different classes of cases in HA 1996.

Simler J stated that the context was important when looking at the appeal stage in this case.

Court of Appeal cases are important ones, and unless there are young minor children to protect, couples must unfortunately expect their dirty linen to be washed in public.»

Understanding the dynamics of the legal issues for getting a case affirmed or reversed on appeal is just as important as the facts and law in the trial court below.

A little less than a decade ago, the federal Third Circuit Court of Appeals, whose rulings affect federal cases in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware, issued an important ruling that can affect people with bipolar disorder in New Jersey.

Junior counsel in the Court of Appeal in an important case for international litigation concerning the scope and effect of jurisdiction agreements in English and Welsh law.

The Court of Appeal recently handed down judgment in Excalibur Ventures v Texas Keystone Inc [2016] EWCA Civ 3436 (Comm), which is an important case on the liability of third - party litigation funders for a non-party costs order under CPR 46.2.

The former Chief Justice of the Québec Court of Appeal, Michel Robert, was well aware that lawyers and judges elsewhere in Canada were missing out on Québec case law of relevance to their work and during his tenure the Court of Appeal began translating important judgments more regularly, even without any request by a party.

So it was perhaps with that in mind that the Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Geoffrey Vos, gave permission for a second appeal in Dammermann v Lanyon Bowdler LLP [2017] EWCA Civ 269, so that the Court of Appeal could consider «important points of practice» arising from what constitutes «unreasonable behaviour» in the context of CPR Pt 27.14 (2)(g) in SCC cases, evidence of which would result in a costs appeal in Dammermann v Lanyon Bowdler LLP [2017] EWCA Civ 269, so that the Court of Appeal could consider «important points of practice» arising from what constitutes «unreasonable behaviour» in the context of CPR Pt 27.14 (2)(g) in SCC cases, evidence of which would result in a costs Appeal could consider «important points of practice» arising from what constitutes «unreasonable behaviour» in the context of CPR Pt 27.14 (2)(g) in SCC cases, evidence of which would result in a costs award.

Last week's decision of the Quebec Court of Appeal in the case of Trudel v. Nahmiash (sub nom New Jersey (Department of the Treasury of the State), Division of Investment v. Trudel), 2009 QCCA 86 («Trudel») raised a number of important issues well worth exploring in further detail.

However, as is the case with any social media platform, it's important to use Pinterest in a way that would appeal to, and hopefully attract, potential clients.

This case (which was argued in the Court of Appeal in October 2014 and is reported at [2015] EWCA 16) raises important issues on the relationship between the safe -LSB-...]

This question, of course, is the dog that didn't bark in an important recent Quebec Court of Appeal case (blogged here): Autorité des marchés financiers c. Groupe SNC - Lavalin Inc., 2013 QCCA 204.

The Handbook then deals, chapter by chapter, with each important step in the progression of a case from ET1 through preliminary hearings, the preparation for the full hearing, the hearing itself and then costs, remedies, and appeals.

The Ontario Bar Association decided that the case was important enough for it to intervene in the appeal.

In my view, the real reason for cases like Mitchell was for the Court of Appeal to flex its muscles and to show practitioners that the new world of economics was more important than any traditional notion of justice.

In this sensationally important personal injury case the Court of Appeal has made it very clear that consulting reports must substantially comply with the Rules to be admissible as expert reports (Healey v. Chung, 2015 BCCA 38).

Appellate counsel, cognizant that the New York Court of Appeals rejects numerous cases that were wrongly decided — only accepting those raising important, novel issues — recognizes that practicing before the Court requires a fundamentally different strategy than that used in the intermediate appellate court.

On November 9, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) will hear an appeal in Office of the Children's Lawyer v JPB and CRB (Supreme Court of Canada, Leave to Appeal (37250)-RRB-(Balev), a case which raises important issues about the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduappeal in Office of the Children's Lawyer v JPB and CRB (Supreme Court of Canada, Leave to Appeal (37250)-RRB-(Balev), a case which raises important issues about the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child AbduAppeal (37250)-RRB-(Balev), a case which raises important issues about the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.

The New Mexico Court of Appeals made two important decisions that helped the plaintiffs in this case.

Is important to note that while the Trust Approach was expressly approved by the Court of Appeal for Ontario in the case of Cronk v. Canadian General Insurance Co. (1995), 25 OR (3d) 505 (CA), such an approach has appeared to have fallen into disapproval more recently (see e.g.: Russo v. Kerr, 2010 ONSC 6053.)

The Federal Court of Appeal has made an important ruling concerning the processes for obtaining and presenting evidence in consultation cases in the Federal Court and Federal Court of Read More

On May 3, 2016, the Ontario Court of Appeal released an important decision in the case of Addison Chevrolet Buick GMC Ltd. v.

On May 3, 2016, the Ontario Court of Appeal released an important decision in the case of Addison Chevrolet Buick GMC Ltd. v. General Motors of Canada Ltd. about the liability of franchisors» associates for bad faith conduct.

Arkin v Borchard Lines Ltd & Others (2005) This was an important case in the English Court of Appeal that, amongst other things, made clear that Litigation Funding is a legitimate method of financing litigation.

In their judgment in the long - running widely - reported whistleblowing case, the Court of Appeal gave important guidance on the differences between the tests for unfair dismissal and unfair dismissal for making a protected disclosurIn their judgment in the long - running widely - reported whistleblowing case, the Court of Appeal gave important guidance on the differences between the tests for unfair dismissal and unfair dismissal for making a protected disclosurin the long - running widely - reported whistleblowing case, the Court of Appeal gave important guidance on the differences between the tests for unfair dismissal and unfair dismissal for making a protected disclosure.

These important statements have now been transposed into the civil context, and the proposition that inadequate reasons for judgment can amount to an independent ground of appeal has recently been applied in Sagl v. Chubb Insurance Company of Canada, 2009 ONCA 388 (C.A.), a case involving a claim on an insurance policy.

But the appeal judges took an important step away from that longstanding principle, ruling that the surveyors» negligence in this case could be applied to the entire two - staged loan agreement.

With that said, the Appeal Court did acknowledge that the parties» intentions — particularly the expectation of a long, indeterminate relationship — may also be important when assessing whether the «marriage - like» standard has been met in any given case.

Though the Fifth Circuit might not reach sentencing issues in the Skilling appeal, this case is worth watching closely if they do because these kinds of disparity arguments seem especially important in the wake of Rita, Gall and Kimbrough.

After - the - event (ATE) insurance premiums are recoverable in clinical negligence cases where the action is settled before proceedings are issued and experts commissioned, the Court of Appeal has clarified in an important decision.