In response to large within - state differences in per - pupil spending across wealthy / high - income and poor districts, state supreme courts overturned school finance systems in 28 states between 1971 and 2010, and many states implemented legislative reforms that spawned
important changes in public education funding.
Not exact matches
First, what happened at CUA
in 1967 — 68 was part of something much larger and more
important than
change in American Catholic
Education, namely, worldwide,
public theological dissent beginning around the time of Vatican II and quickly gaining control of most of the world's Catholic graduate programs and journals.
You are also right that
changing lunch culture is a a battle within a larger battle — the larger battle is about getting the
public to truly value
public education, understanding that it is the single-most
important public program
in our nation, the one that has the power to shape the future
in our best (or worst) interests.
And stability is especially
important today, because it's never been more
important that NAEP remain a trustworthy audit of American
public education as it
changes in all sorts of different ways.
Along the way, I've learned some
important lessons about what works
in public education, what doesn't, and what (and who) are the biggest obstacles to the transformative
changes we still need.
During the eight years (2007 to 2014) that the
Education Next (EdNext) poll has been administered to a representative sample of American adults (and,
in most of these years, to a representative sample of
public school teachers), we have seen only minimal
changes from one year to the next on such
important issues as charter schools, merit pay, teacher tenure, teachers unions, and tax credits that fund private - school scholarships.
Ted Kolderie writes that the current arrangement of K - 12
public education is an obstacle to school and district improvement and that state leaders have an
important role to play
in shaping system - wide
change.