New Zealand has yet to sort out where the Treaty of Waitangi fits within the structure of the New Zealand legal system, notwithstanding
important dicta in the Privy Council in New Zealand Maori Council v Attorney - General, a case in which the present Chief Justice appeared as counsel for the Maori Council.
Not exact matches
Perhaps it's telling that Manifesto's best segments extol the virtues of conceptual art, in which, as Lewitt - via - Blanchett puts it, the idea behind the work is far more
important that its execution, and artistic appropriation, via the (probably apocryphal) Godard
dictum, «It's not where you take things from; it's where you take them to.»
From the point of view of the AGW Consensus, the most
important applications of Feynman's
dicta would be in GCM design and testing, and in making sense of the historical instrumental record.
Nonetheless, Asermly is
important, very
important and perhaps groud breaking because essentially, in
dicta the RI Supreme Court acted as a legislative / administrative body and issued rules.
But here there is a split among federal courts of appeals on an
important constitutional question — the D.C. Circuit and the Fifth Circuit take the individual rights view (see here and here for why the Fifth Circuit's decision can't be dismissed as
dictum), while I think nine other circuits take the collective rights view.
In so doing, the court made two potentially
important rulings: (i) Whether or not the threshold is crossed may well depend on the context; in a statement echoing one of the most famous
dicta in the law of nuisance («what would be a nuisance in Belgrave Square would not necessarily be a nuisance in Bermondsey»: Sturges v Bridgman (1879) 11 Ch D 852, per Lord Justice Thesiger) it was suggested that what might not be harassment on the factory floor or in the barrack room might well be in the hospital ward, or vice versa.
However, the decision should be approached with some caution, as the most
important parts consist of obiter
dicta.
According to the presentation «rule of three»
dictum, if you want to get
important messages across effectively and gain support, condense what you want to say into three points, and explain each of them thoroughly.