The RSS feed of a prominent legal blogger recently carried an item tagged «breaking news» describing
an important federal circuit court opinion.
Not exact matches
Corbett in PA just lost an
important First Amendment case in
Federal Circuit Court.
«It is
important for the U.S. Supreme
Court to take this case, as the Ninth
Circuit opinion ignores 20 years of precedents on special education law and represents yet another example of a
federal agency exceeding its authority over educational decision making,» NSBA Executive Director Thomas J. Gentzel said.
It is
important to note that the decision in a
federal court of appeals is not binding on the cases that are outside of its
circuit — there are 13 different
federal court of appeals
circuits.
A little less than a decade ago, the
federal Third
Circuit Court of Appeals, whose rulings affect
federal cases in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware, issued an
important ruling that can affect people with bipolar disorder in New Jersey.
The Supreme
Court's decision in TC Heartland represents a sea of change in the analysis to determine proper venue in patent cases.3 Soon after TC Heartland, the
Federal Circuit provided a roadmap to determine if venue is proper in a patent case post-TC Heartland.4 However, an
important question remained — may accused infringers who failed to raise the defense of improper venue pre-TC Heartland now challenge venue post-TC Heartland.
But here there is a split among
federal courts of appeals on an
important constitutional question — the D.C.
Circuit and the Fifth
Circuit take the individual rights view (see here and here for why the Fifth
Circuit's decision can't be dismissed as dictum), while I think nine other
circuits take the collective rights view.
Until the recent Sixth
Circuit decision, the most
important invocation of Bush v. Gore by a
federal appeals
court probably came in a 2006 case decided by a different panel of the same
court.
In terms of family law, it has been and will continue to be
important that the approach by the Family
Court of Western Australia, the
Federal Circuit Court and the Family
Court as the three main
courts exercising jurisdiction under the Family Law Act work cohesively and harmoniously in these ongoing and long term objectives.