Sentences with phrase «important intellectual content»
All authors read, edited or revised the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final version.
bmjopen.bmj.com
All authors reviewed the manuscript critically for important intellectual content and gave final approval for it to be published.
All the authors have made substantive intellectual contributions to this study by contributing to the design, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, or approving the final version to be published.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Merewood, Cook, and Philipp.
«Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND Final approval of the version to be published; AND Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.»
O.H. contributed to the conception, and design of the experiments, interpretation of data, and critically revising the manuscript for important intellectual content.
All authors critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content.
P.A., E.A., B.B., J.W.J.B., H.B., F.C. - C., G.F., P.W.F., J.H., J.M.H., V.Ka., T.J.K., K.T.K., V.Kr., T.K., V.V.M.M., P.N., K.O., D.P., S.P., O.R., I.R., C.S., M. - J.S., M.B.S., A.M.W.S., A.T., R.T., D.L.v.d.A., A.M.L.W., R.Z. - R., and E.R. reviewed and edited the manuscript, contributed to study conception and design and interpretation of data, revised the article critically for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to be published.
M.v.N. researched data, wrote the manuscript, contributed to study conception and design and interpretation of data, revised the article critically for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to be published.
Authorship credit should be based only on substantial contributions to (a) conception and design, or analysis and interpretation of data; (b) on drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and (c) on final approval of the version to be published.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Danese, Moffitt, Harrington, Milne, Polanczyk, Pariante, Poulton, and Caspi.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Boynton - Jarrett, Fargnoli, Suglia, and Zuckerman.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Flaherty, Thompson, Litrownik, Theodore, Black, Wike, Runyan, and Dubowitz.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Mendelsohn, Huberman, Berkule, Brockmeyer, Morrow, and Dreyer.
IC participated in drafting the manuscript, while DS, GP, and EP revised it critically for important intellectual content.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: CH, BF.
(i) Made a substantial contribution to the concept or design of the work; or acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data, (ii) Drafted the article or revised it critically for important intellectual content, (iii) Approved the version to be published, (iv) Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content.
CG, RI, GC, GC, and VL wrote parts of the manuscript, designed figures and tables, provided comments on the manuscript for important intellectual content, critically reviewed it.
KP, SS, and YSR drafted the work and revised it critically for important intellectual content.
Both revised the work critically for important intellectual content.