On February 20, 2018 Microsoft's Xbox Division Boss Phil Spencer made one of gaming's most
important opening speeches in the history of the medium.
Not exact matches
The most
important aspect of the Schmidt
speech was that, as a consequence, the doors to the DfE were suddenly
open.
Open debate and free
speech are
important.
So it's really
important this research is conducted so that we can design
open - plan classrooms that meet the recommended noise levels to ensure adequate
speech perception in the learning environment.
The tireless, fast - talking impresario is highly in demand, so we were lucky to meet him between gallery
openings and
speeches during the London Art Fair and to finally sit him down in the garden of the Zumthor Pavillion at Serpentine Gallery to get his view on the avant - garde: «I think it is very
important that we find a way through curating to actually engage in a global dialogue.
It doesn't seem so, and in some ways the entire week felt like a gigantic exercise in expectation management: Crossed Arms, Legitimate Constraints & Fidgeting Phone Use The exercise began at the
opening ceremony, where body language seemed to reveal the subtext of the
speeches: From Tony Blair's nonchalance and statements on how establishing a path was more
important that specific targets, to Todd Stern's crossed arms and not - so - thinly veiled reference to «legitimate constraints» in US politics, to India's environment minister seemingly frustrated by it all, at times resting his head on his hands or fiddling with his Blackberry, all with an air of «nothing
important is going to happen here», what wasn't verbalized was as
important as what was.
[10:07 a.m. In his
speech opening the meeting Ban made this
important pitch to religious leaders in the room and beyond:
You say «What sickens me is the hypocrisy of people who claim to be in favour of
speech, claim to believe in empiricism, claim to be sceptics yet refuse to accept room for an honest,
open debate on one of the most
important political issues of our time.»
What sickens me is the hypocrisy of people who claim to be in favour of
speech, claim to believe in empiricism, claim to be sceptics yet refuse to accept room for an honest,
open debate on one of the most
important political issues of our time.
Tom Nelson is an
important account for us climate sceptics and not having it damages Twitter's credibility as a platform for free
speech, and for an
open exchange of views.