In November, 2015, the three lead NIPCC authors — Craig Idso, Robert M. Carter, and S. Fred Singer — wrote a small book titled Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming: The NIPCC Report on Scientific Consensus revealing how no survey or study shows a «consensus» on the most
important scientific issues in the climate change debate, and how most scientists do not support the alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
The three lead NIPCC authors — Craig Idso, Robert M. Carter, and S. Fred Singer — reveal how no survey or study shows a «consensus» on the most
important scientific issues in the climate change debate, and how most scientists do not support the alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Not exact matches
Evidence Basis for the Ten Steps of Mother - Friendly Care
in the Journal of Perinatal Education, 2007,
Issue 16, a Special Supplement The result of a 2 - year research project by a team of maternity care experts, this
important work reviews 15 years worth of
scientific studies which and found that the evidence supports complying with each aspect of the ten steps of Mother - Friendly Care.
► Rush Holt, AAAS CEO and the executive publisher of Science, wrote an editorial
in this week's
issue about the
important role that the association plays within the
scientific community.
Science covers news
in all areas of science, from geology to genetics, as well as science policy and
issues important to the
scientific community, such as science, technology, engineering, and math education and sexual harassment.
But the
important point is that a large number of
scientific journals are standing together
in their conviction that reproducibility and transparency are
important issues.
With this
issue in mind, a team of American researchers reviewed the available
scientific literature and suggested four
important considerations to maximize the clinical impact of future research regarding adolescent depression symptoms and substance use.
«From a public health perspective, even a weak effect of temperature on health constitutes an
important problem due to ubiquity of exposure,» Manuela De Sario and Paola Michelozzi, both of the Lazio Region Department of Epidemiology
in Rome and co-authors of an editorial that appears
in the same
issue of the BMJ, explained
in an e-mail to
Scientific American.
The result is that Canadians — and the rest of the world — have been denied the chance to hear from some of the most authoritative
scientific voices on
important issues ranging from the Arctic ozone hole to radiation after the Fukushima Daiichi reactor accident
in Japan, and even the effect of aquaculture on wild salmon.
The letter ends with a promise of collaboration, saying, «We
in the
scientific community are prepared to work with you on the
scientific issues important to your deliberations as you seek to address the challenges of our changing climate.»
• One of the most provocative and potentially
important science
issues in recent years is the apparent irreproducibility of
scientific studies.
In the future, as new
scientific discoveries elucidate
important host - vector - pathogen interactions, novel ELSI
issues might emerge; implications for individuals and society are as yet unknown and unpredictable.
The ceremony is part of Kavli Prize Week - a week of special programs that celebrate extraordinary achievements
in science, educate the public on
important scientific advances, and bring together distinguished members of the international community to discuss key global
issues in science and science policy.
The primary objective of the RME course is to provide a state - of - the - art review of various aspects of regenerative medicine including background material, the key
scientific components of the field of regenerative medicine, ethical, economic and
issues important to regenerative medicine as well as an opportunity to network and meet leading professionals
in the field.
There are
important differences between these diets
in terms of environmental damage, animal cruelty and
scientific issues regarding the amount of fat, complex carbohydrate and protein for optimal health and longevity.
In addition, FEDIAF's
Scientific Advisory Board has
issued a statement on nutrition of senior dogs - with a view to extended life expectancy of pets this statement was seen as
important to explain the nutritional requirements of senior dogs.
The findings of V+S represent an
important contribution to the ongoing
scientific discourse on the
issue of climate change impacts on tropical cyclones, and the study should spur additional work looking at the complicated
issues involved
in greater detail.
(«You need to continue to make the lack of
scientific certainty a primary
issue in the debate...») The unlikely chain from Luntz to Obama included two
important links, E.D.F. President Fred Krupp and Senator Lindsey Graham.
I think one of the most
important things media can do is not present
issues of
scientific fact
in a false - balance way.
Dear Don, your post was really informative and this is very interesting and most sensitive
issue in the present world.climate ethics are most
important for everyone.because these are an
important role
in climate changes.i agree with your argument, i think
scientific measures must have been taken by the government
in order to successful implementation of the climate ethics.
Science historians would point out that Professor Revelle did not prompt the first CO2 measurement
in the atmosphere; what he prompted was the first sampling of air from locations around the world, and it was actually Harry Wexler, the head of the Weather Service at the time, who prompted and actually funded the start of the long - term monitoring program by David Keeling on Mauna Loa — so Revelle did play a very
important role
in stimulating observations (and
in 1965 he chaired the panel on this
issue that prepared a quite insightful appendix for the report of the President's
Scientific Advisory Council), but Revelle was not the very first to urge CO2 be measured
in the atmosphere.
But even with the «environmental» groups» strong influence, the Obama Administration may not have trusted the SAB to render the invalid
scientific conclusions on climate alarmism they wanted
in their Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Endangerment Finding and failed to submit their GHG Endangerment Finding to the SAB for review despite the clear need for it to do so on such an
important and influential
issue.
I'm surprised that you're not willing to discuss this
issue since it formed an
important part of your narrative that the politics was driving
scientific statements
in IPCC reports.
Two days ago, I wrote that for me the real
issue in the upcoming Mann vs Steyn trial is not so much my own personal freedom of speech but the broader freedom to speak given «the climate of fear that Mann and his fellow ayatollahs of alarmism have succeeded
in imposing on an
important scientific field»:
My interest
in this post is airing interesting an
important scientific issue.
Important ethical
issues entailed by decision - making
in the face of
scientific uncertainty will remain hidden including: (a) Who should have the burden of proof?
Of course papers are
important for the
scientific record, but if the main temperature record providers update their work
in response to the
issues we raise it'll be recorded
in their publications.
In addition,
important scientific research is ongoing as there are still many questions that must be answered before we take steps to address this
issue.
This is an
important question, because (as I have shown
in previous research) negativity toward scientists is associated with the rejection of
scientific consensus on
issues like climate change.