The most
important test data for all public schools is that used by states to measure student achievement, and in the case of charter schools, decide whether they may continue to operate.
Not exact matches
«My idea of an app that is really good is one that has had rigorous
testing to say that «this really helps,» with proper groupings,» Sridhar says, adding that it's
important for any app to do this before making any assumptions on its
data.
Sure it's
important to be able to navigate around a balance sheet, cash flow statement and income statement, but the really great investors spend their time reading, thinking, focusing on the qualitative
data and
testing ideas.
the proof of Gods presence in us is not limited to the material or biological evolutionary development only, but most
important scientific proof is the effect of His will in historical development of the world.A computer program now used and
tested a powerful machine by inputing all recorded events in history during the last hundreds years and found out that it has a purpose and not random.Meaning that an intelligent being could have influence it.It is now presumed by the religious observers that it could be His will.The process now is under improvement, because the computers is not powerl enough the deluge of information and
data since the beginning of history, some analyst believes that in them near future if the Quantum computers which is much powerful than the present coventional will be used, then dramatic results and confirmation will be at hand.
Another, equally
important, feature: the
test plant is designed for both continuous and batch operation, and a PLC logs measured values and process
data.
It is
important to mention this to avoid misinterpretations, sure, but the study seems to be american - centered (there are
tests of this method in European coutries, but if I read correctly the graph is only taken from US
data).
Another
important design consideration is the types of statistical
tests that will be used on the
data.
«
Testing these contrasting hypotheses was an opportunity to not only help people understand and plan for diversity changes after extreme weather events, but also to provide
important data that would move the field of ecology forward.»
The authors conclude that «the
data strongly support the view that human emissions play an
important role in climate change and represent a key
test for climate change theory.»
«This is a globally unique
data set in which we can control for genetics and
test for the effect of experience,» said UMD Biology Professor William F. Fagan, a co-author of the paper, «and it gives us an indication of just how
important this kind of socially learned behavior is.»
«You can not really
test the idea that animal reservoirs are
important other than building a model from the
data available.
«In light of findings from the study, the dental visit could be a useful opportunity to conduct diabetes screening among at - risk, undiagnosed patients — an
important first step in identifying those who need further
testing to determine their diabetes status,» said the study's principal investigator, Dr. Shiela Strauss, associate professor of nursing and co-director of the Statistics and
Data Management Core for NYU's Colleges of Nursing and Dentistry.
Even more
important, the thermal - vacuum
test enabled us to get significant runtime on the avionics and components within the spacecraft, emulating the communication cadence and
data streams that we would eventually see on orbit.»
These approaches are
important complements to empirical studies, generating new predictions that we can
test with genomic
data or in field or greenhouse experiments.
While we will reviews what early
tests have shown and what the science says so far, it is
important to understand that HIIT has not been in the scientific eye all that long, so most
tests are relatively new and there's a limited amount of total
data available at this point.
«NAPLAN is a point - in - time
test of a just a few, albeit
important — subjects which can be compared to the same
data collected at other times and around Australia, to help work out, among other things and alongside other
data, the effects of different education programs and policies, and the places where additional resources could make the greatest impact.
We also need to continue explorations of
data of all types (not just
test scores), building on, for example,
important research that's helping us develop early warning indicators to prevent students from dropping out.
But civil - rights advocates have recognized that shining light on disparities of result, such as the requirement that
test data be disaggregated by racial and income groups under NCLB, is an
important first step to reform.
Syncing
data from all these with an LMS offers several advantages such as
important employee
data getting automatically updated, critical compliance
tests automatically scheduled,
data from across different platforms available to access complex reports etc..
The skills of making and
testing hypotheses and analysing
data are
important both in mathematics and in scientific enquiry.
The
test - score
data were adjusted statistically to account for any observed differences between the two groups, such as level of family income - an
important predictor of academic performance - that might have biased the results.
Because, oftentimes when I talk to teachers and I say «
data are really
important to school improvement», they're thinking standardised
test data;
data that might come from the government or might be administered outside of their own classroom.
The last and most
important piece is hard and fast
data, such as interim assessments and state
tests.
These
tests help students understand one of the myriad reasons it is
important to study vocabulary, and how these practice
tests provide me with a great source of
data to measure student growth.
As described in the articles in this issue, school staff routinely find themselves pressed into service as
testing coordinators, substitute teachers, chaperones,
data analysts, and so on, diverting them from the
important roles that they are ready, willing, and prepared to play in students» lives.
Data from college admissions
tests can provide a valuable measure of student achievement, but the non-representativeness of
test - takers is an
important concern.
The recent ubiquity of standardized
test scores has provided new
data on just how poorly some schools are performing — particularly schools filled with lower - income and minority students, whose parents make up an
important Democratic voting base.
Standardized
test scores are an
important data point that can tell us something about the overall effectiveness of our curriculum, instruction, and school programming.
Looking at
data over at least two or three years is
important;
test scores can vary a lot from year to year.
As
important as it is to question whether
test data can measure teacher performance, is the need to consider the collateral damage to education, learning, school climate, etc., that such a misguided one - dimensional approach has had.
So, it is doubly
important that Carnegie commissioned McKinsey to use the reformers»
data «to
test whether or not it might be possible to avoid large drops in graduation rates using human capital strategies alone.»
beyond
test scores (like SBAC state
testing) to include a variety of other
important topics like teacher retention, the history of superintendents, and the accountability through the new CA
data dashboard.
It's
important to look at the
data on which rankings are based to see what's really going on with
test scores.»
Another common mistake is to make raising
test scores the primary goal, displacing the more
important goal of gathering rich
data that suggest what adjustments are likely to increase student understanding.
Even for teachers with relevant student
test score
data available for evaluations, it is critical to use multiple measures to capture the myriad of
important things teachers are expected to do.
The lesson of the NRC - NAEd report is that even though value - added methodologies offer a number of advantages over other approaches that consider
test - score
data in a vacuum, policymakers need to move carefully in adopting any approach — value - added or otherwise — in making
important decisions about individual teachers.
Making sure the value - added
data and the observation ratings are in the same ballpark is an
important test of accuracy for both measures, according to a study published last year by Measures of Effective Teaching, a research project funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
This is an
important question because it appears that the Obama administration is essentially allowing any evaluation system to gain its blessing long as it has unspecified use of longitudinal student
test score growth
data as one of the main components.
At HP's invitation, the Using
Data staff will lead teachers through discussions, introduce field - tested strategies for data analysis, and scaffold the integration of best practices that ensure that data is an important component of the teaching proc
Data staff will lead teachers through discussions, introduce field -
tested strategies for
data analysis, and scaffold the integration of best practices that ensure that data is an important component of the teaching proc
data analysis, and scaffold the integration of best practices that ensure that
data is an important component of the teaching proc
data is an
important component of the teaching process.
Testing serves an
important purpose, but the
tests have to be targeted and meaningful so that teachers have the
data they need to plan effective lessons.
This is particularly
important as illustrated in the prior post (Footnote 8 of the full piece to be exact), because «Teacher effectiveness ratings were based on, in order of importance by the proportion of weight assigned to each indicator [including first and foremost]: (1) scores derived via [this] district - created and purportedly «rigorous» (Dee & Wyckoff, 2013, p. 5) yet invalid (i.e., not having been validated) observational instrument with which teachers are observed five times per year by different folks, but about which no psychometric
data were made available (e.g., Kappa statistics to
test for inter-rater consistencies among scores).»
But there is an even more
important reason to reduce the role of standardized
testing data in teacher evaluation.
The NWEA MAP
test is an
important external measure that we use to gather
data in order to further support participating schools.
Are you really willing to believe the political posturing and bureaucratic claims that, in essence, come down to obtaining one
data point in order to meet the all -
important 95 %
Test Participation Rate required by the Every Student Succeeds Act and the federal U.S. Department of Education?
Specifically, claims of success were based on reports that omitted
important factors for student learning and
test score outcomes and utilized crude
data supported by isolated, small effect sizes.
In contrast, perhaps
testing and accountability do indeed provide
important, actionable
data, and it is the state's, district's, or school's responsibility to help teachers ready their students for these
tests.
She spoke about how
tests are
important, but how we lose the «soul» of what education is about when we focus too much on
data points and not enough about what kind of people we want our students to be.
While the
test may appear a failure, vast amounts of
important data have been gathered by the team concerning the power unit, electronics and the car itself.
«These crash
tests will give FHWA
important data about how the ET - Plus performs, but they are only one action among several efforts we're undertaking on behalf of the American driving public.»
One of the most
important part of any crash
test are the dummies, which allow
testing teams to gather
data about how a body would react in a crash.