Not exact matches
With its festival atmosphere and a panel
of judges from the worlds
of venture capital and communications as well as
science, the Skolar Award contest also expresses a somewhat subversive notion: that researchers need not only to discover
important new knowledge, but also to convey it beyond the lab and readers
of scientific journals so that society at large can understand it,
value it, benefit from it, and support it.
Professor José Mariano Gago, Portugal's minister for
science, technology, and higher education, spoke about
valuing science over bureaucracy and the importance
of stability for creating
important science projects.
Saying «communicating the
value of science has never been more
important to human well - being,» AAAS will make an online
science advocacy toolkit available on April 19 to provide scientists and engineers and
science advocates with resources and information needed to advance
science in the public sphere.
Communicating
science to lay audiences is an
important skill for all scientists because, if called upon, we all need to be ready to explain our work or demonstrate the
value of public investment in research.
Misconduct is «a betrayal
of trust» and «a betrayal
of the most
important value in
science, and that's the truth,» Resnik says.
Churchill was a
science enthusiast and advocate, but he also contemplated
important scientific questions in the context
of human
values.
Slotten's timely and well - written book reminds us
of two
important facts
of modern life: that a society that can not uphold the
values of science will not be able to benefit from it; and that a
science that can not address the
values, needs and questioning
of society and inspire its support will lose its public patronage.
This type
of training is
important, he says, because public outreach «is
valued in the
science community, be it by peers, institutions — or as a specific activity in research projects.
ISPRA, Italy — The landscape is familiar to
science policy experts on both sides
of the Atlantic: To address serious global problems and to take advantage
of important future discoveries, they will have to work effectively with elected officials and members
of the public who have complex and sometimes conflicting
values and interests.
Though my parents, who are not scientists, don't always understand exactly what it is that I'm doing on a day - to - day basis, they are supportive at every step, encouraging me to be the best version
of myself in scientific pursuits, but reminding me that the world is larger than just
science, and that it's
important to stay grounded in my personal
values.
Susan Hanson
of Inorganic, Isotope and Actinide Chemistry (C - IIAC), Ruilian Wu and Louis «Pete» Silks
of Bioenergy and Environmental
Science (B - 8) have developed a significant advance in catalysis science that furthers the important goal of breaking down biomass into high - value commodity che
Science (B - 8) have developed a significant advance in catalysis
science that furthers the important goal of breaking down biomass into high - value commodity che
science that furthers the
important goal
of breaking down biomass into high -
value commodity chemicals.
This property also contains an internationally
important combination
of earth
science values.
Understanding the social and cognitive components
of science is certainly
important, but the abstract reads as if the possibility that we are discussing estimates
of an objective quantity with an actual quantitative
value is a matter
of complete irrelevance.
Watch the first 1 to 2 minutes section
of the UP Stream Pt 4 doco / research prject specifically being directed at all Climate Scientists about how
important Values are, and why Listening to the community (the target market) is absolutely critical: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyRKTqsXfjM Watch how people (the general public) are treated by others (climate scientists included) on all climate blogs when they indicate they are not yet convinced
of AGW or can't work out who to believe is telling the truth and in doing so reference someone else's «opinion»... and try and measure the level
of paranoia exhibited by pro-agw folks about such negative comments about the
science.
There's loads
of social
science out there indicating that things like
values are more
important predictors
of viewpoint and policy attitudes than scientific knowledge.
In
science, it is
important to fully describe your methods (so that others can evaluate their efficacy, dangers, etc. and so that «even if your method is flawed», some
of the
value of the work can be preserved by corrections».)
The American Statistical Association
of which I am a longtime member issued an
important statement today which will hopefully move statistical practice in engineering and especially in the
sciences away from the misleading practice
of using p -
values and hypothesis tests.
It is
important to them to have a
science - approved stamp to their dogma (Western techno - civilisation has hurt mother Gaia, and it is really time that we repent from our sins and go back to a «natural» way
of life (that will be extensively described by their prefered high priest, usually involving actions ranked more from symbolic
value than effectiveness in reducing CO2.
Today — due to the
important, irreplaceable
values of its Arctic waters for Indigenous, Alaska Native and local communities» subsistence and cultures, wildlife and wildlife habitat, and scientific research; the vulnerability
of these ecosystems to an oil spill; and the unique logistical, operational, safety, and scientific challenges and risks
of oil extraction and spill response in Arctic waters — the United States is designating the vast majority
of U.S. waters in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas as indefinitely off limits to offshore oil and gas leasing, and Canada will designate all Arctic Canadian waters as indefinitely off limits to future offshore Arctic oil and gas licensing, to be reviewed every five years through a climate and marine
science - based life - cycle assessment.