The fact is that some of the barriers which national cultures have
imposed upon religious comprehension have already grown so high that very little if any understanding exists across them.
With this gesture, the Vatican said, the Pope «desired to show his closeness, attention and prayer also to all those who suffer for their faith, in particular to Christians who are enduring persecution or limitations
imposed upon their religious freedom.»
Not exact matches
On August 31, 2007, the president of Clemson University opened a letter from the South Carolina chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union that read, «Coach [Tommy] Bowden... has abused his authority as... head football coach by
imposing his strong personal
religious beliefs
upon....
The fact remains, however, that the Vichy leaders have enforced anti-Semitic laws in a more and more strict and iniquitous fashion, depriving French Jews of every governmental and cultural position,
imposing upon them all kinds of restrictions with regard to liberal and commercial professions, mercilessly striking many of them who were wounded for their country during the present war, and hypocritically trying to hide a bad conscience under a pseudonational pathos in which
religious and racial considerations are shamefully mixed.
The
religious insights usually emerge naturally out of depictions of worldly existence rather than appear to have been
imposed intellectually
upon the work.
The givenness of the barrier between time now and time then yields for us banalities about anachronism, on the one side, and
imposes upon us the requirement of mediating between historical fact and
religious truth, on the other.
On August 31, 2007, the president of Clemson University opened a letter from the South Carolina chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union that read, «Coach [Tommy] Bowden... has abused his authority as... head football coach by
imposing his strong personal
religious beliefs
upon student - athletes under his charge.»
Any place of business is required by law (at least here in GA) to accomodate any
religious belief in so far as it does not
impose an «undo hardship»
upon the business.
So a project emerged aimed at extending a reasonably good life to the many without
imposing either
religious or philosophical authority
upon them.
[5] Pius XI made clear in his encyclical on education, «when the faithful demand Catholic schools for their children, they are not raising a question of party politics, but simply performing a
religious duty which their conscience rigidly
imposes upon them.»
Rigid teleologies that
impose a trivial form of harmony
upon the universe and make God the overseer of this world order are intolerable not only on scientific but also on
religious grounds.
I appreciate this legal reasoning might not be very satisfying, particularly in light of your hypothetical, and while I personally disagree with the effect being a
religious business owner may indirectly
impose their beliefs
upon their employees, I nonetheless see the decision as a correct application of the law (i.e. RFRA) as written.
Furthermore, the chief justice believes that the court, in
imposing paternalistic limitations
upon the process of full American political discussion, is justified by the evidence to be found in the experiences of other nations: «The history of many countries attests to the hazards of religion intruding into the political arena or of political power intruding into the legitimate and free exercise of
religious belief.»
No,
religious fanatics determined to
impose their beliefs
upon others are the root of quite a bit of evil.
My contention that the propositional element in
religious assertions consists of stories interpreted as straightforwardly empirical propositions which are not, generally speaking, believed to be true has the great advantage of
imposing no restriction whatever
upon the empirical interpretation which can be put
upon the stories.
All it prevents them from doing is
imposing the
religious practices of one group
upon others, out of concern they might feel uncomfortable.
«It's their way, their cultural view, their
religious view, their lifestyle view, and then they say, «not only I believe it for myself, but I'm going to take that value and that view and I'm going to
impose it
upon you and your lifestyle.»
There has always been a tension between
religious freedom and groups who feel that part of
religious freedom is
imposing their religion
upon others.
However, it should also be recognized in passing that there are generally certain
religious motives involved, a personal framework through which they understand and live their lives which they then seek to
impose upon the evidence and empirical science.
Typical, a judge can be informed in exercising discretion afforded by secular law by an overall
religious worldview without infringing
upon freedom of religion (e.g. in judging what sentence within a range should be
imposed) but may not cite to
religious sources as authority for that decision.
Parents often emphasize in the agreement that neither parent will change the child's current
religious affiliation,
impose any
religious practice
upon the child, or initiate or terminate
religious education for him, except
upon the prior consent of the other.