Not exact matches
Limoges appealed, arguing that that the court made an
improper credibility assessment
about the affidavit of the Limoges expert and because the
judge overlooked material issues of fact that were in dispute.
In Brisset v Brisset [2009] EWCA Civ 679, [2009] All ER (D) 94 (Jul) the circuit
judge had communicated with the district
judge at first in writing and then orally
about the substance of an appeal and although this had been disclosed to the parties, it was procedurally
improper.
Specifically, the Court of Appeal reasoned that the trial
Judge's reliance on Google Maps to make a finding
about the distance between the scene of the arrest and a district office was not
improper.