The sooner Gates issues a public correction, the sooner we can move beyond this dispute over what is actually a sidebar in their report and focus instead on the enormously interesting project on which they've embarked to
improve measures of teacher effectiveness.
The Gates Foundation is funding a $ 45 million project to
improve measures of teacher effectiveness.
Not exact matches
Additional research that validates these
measures of teacher effectiveness on non-tested outcomes would have important implications not only for
teacher recruitment, assessment, and placement, but also for
improving overall life trajectories
of students.
On the basis
of these survey results, we created three
measures: (1) the principal's overall assessment
of the
teacher's
effectiveness, which is a single item from the survey; (2) the
teacher's ability to
improve student academic performance, which is a simple average
of the organization, classroom management, reading achievement, and math achievement survey items; and (3) the
teacher's ability to increase student satisfaction, which is a simple average
of the role model and student satisfaction survey items.
Ultimately, the administration hopes states will
improve their approach to professional development and create ways
of measuring teacher effectiveness.
The next round must get to
measuring teacher effectiveness based on student achievement, promoting professional development that is based on research and effective practice and
improves performance, providing incentives for
teachers who are effective, and requiring removal
of teachers who, even with solid professional development, can't or don't
improve.
The correlation between
teacher effectiveness (as demonstrated by value - added student growth
measures) and student life outcomes (higher salaries, advanced degrees, neighborhoods
of residence, and retirement savings) is staggering; it's not an exaggeration to say that great
teachers substantially
improve students» future quality
of life and those students» contributions to the common good.
When school systems begin to use
measures of effective teaching to assess the
effectiveness of their own efforts,
teachers will understand that the burden for
improving teaching does not sit upon their shoulders alone.
It's long been noted that, by most
measures, the average
teacher improves enormously in the first several years on the job, after which student - achievement gains (one gauge
of teacher effectiveness) level off.
Teachers should have the aforementioned school community goals and the
teacher's own goals for students in mind and determine what will best
measure the
effectiveness of the new practice in
improving students learning experience.
There may also be ways
of improving predictions for both new and more experienced
teachers using multiple
measures of teaching
effectiveness.
Accordingly, and also per the research, this is not getting much better in that, as per the authors
of this article as well as many other scholars, (1) «the variance in value - added scores that can be attributed to
teacher performance rarely exceeds 10 percent; (2) in many ways «gross» measurement errors that in many ways come, first, from the tests being used to calculate value - added; (3) the restricted ranges in
teacher effectiveness scores also given these test scores and their limited stretch, and depth, and instructional insensitivity — this was also at the heart
of a recent post whereas in what demonstrated that «the entire range from the 15th percentile
of effectiveness to the 85th percentile
of [
teacher]
effectiveness [using the EVAAS] cover [ed] approximately 3.5 raw score points [given the tests used to
measure value - added];» (4) context or student, family, school, and community background effects that simply can not be controlled for, or factored out; (5) especially at the classroom /
teacher level when students are not randomly assigned to classrooms (and
teachers assigned to teach those classrooms)... although this will likely never happen for the sake
of improving the sophistication and rigor
of the value - added model over students» «best interests.»
The best result
of the new evaluation systems is that they put the
measure of a
teacher's
effectiveness at the center
of the conversation about
improving student achievement.
Changing the current evaluation system to focus on
improved student outcomes, including objective
measures of student growth, is critical to
improving teacher effectiveness, raising student achievement, and meeting the objectives
of the federal «No Child Left Behind Act
of 2001.»
The
measures also could be the foundation
of new
teacher salary schedules that would provide the largest pay hikes when a
teacher's
effectiveness level
improved.
Also recall that one
of the key reports that triggered the current call for VAMs, as the «more objective»
measures needed to
measure and therefore
improve teacher effectiveness, was based on data that suggested that «too many
teachers» were being rated as satisfactory or above.
Zimmer's role: trying to stop fellow LAUSD board member Yolie Flores, a gutsy reformer, advocate
of the poor, and UTLA enemy, from
improving classrooms by
measuring teacher effectiveness.
Peer reviews, which were once a
measure of effectiveness, will only be used to provide supportive feedback a
teacher can use to
improve professional practice.
This work argues the importance
of the noncognitive for student life outcomes, reviews the little we know about how to
improve student academic perseverance and mindset, and raises questions about our nation's current
measures of teacher effectiveness.
Lindsay Fox, Doctoral Candidate
of Stanford Graduate School
of Education, discusses her research on Playing to
Teachers» Strengths: Using multiple
measures of teacher effectiveness to
improve teacher assignments which is to be published in Education Finance and Policy.