The logic model broke down and described the complex school
improvement activities the leaders had planned, which helped everyone get on the same page.
Not exact matches
A public statement followed by a series of
activities to promote more high - quality schools could drive
improvement from the ground up if state
leaders continue to fail to act.
Specifically, they must monitor and challenge schools in relation to the agreed goals of collaborative
activities, whilst school
leaders share responsibility for the overall management of
improvement efforts.
District
leaders need to establish clear expectations across multiple dimensions of
improvement activity as the bases for increasing coherence, coordination, and synergy in the effectiveness of district
improvement efforts over time.
Thus it is important to have inclusive leadership, empowering teacher
leaders to assist in examining the data, propose suggestions for
improvement, and then monitor
activities.
Designed as a companion piece to Assembly Required, the Implementation Guide, with its hands - on
activities and exercises, many with copyable forms and worksheets, will help busy
leaders effectively and efficiently plan and implement
improvement strategies in their schools & districts.
Numerous provisions contained in S. 1177 represent a huge step forward from current legislation: the elimination of adequate yearly progress and the 100 percent proficiency requirements, tempering the test - and - punish provisions of No Child Left Behind; the continued requirement of disaggregated subgroup data; removal of the unworkable school turnaround models required under the School
Improvement Grant and Race to the Top programs; clarification of the term school
leader as the principal of an elementary, middle or high school; inclusion of the use of Title II funds for a «School Leadership Residency Program»;
activities to improve the recruitment, preparation, placement, support, and retention of effective principals and school
leaders in high - need schools; and the allowable use of Title II funds to develop induction and mentoring programs that are designed to improve school leadership and provide opportunities for mentor principals and other educators who are experienced and effective.
For too many school and district
leaders, formal evaluation is a compliance
activity instead of an opportunity to provide meaningful feedback to teachers for
improvement.
Productive career ladders (or lattices) can also create avenues for such sharing to occur, as teachers take on roles as mentor and master teachers, as curriculum and assessment specialists, and as
leaders of school -
improvement activities.
NASSP believes that data has the power to transform teaching and learning by helping educators identify and provide supports to all students, assisting teachers and school
leaders in improving their instructional practices, and informing schoolwide
improvement activities.
As a passionate
leader, I believe in constant process
improvement activities and strive hard to manage analysis in a manner that best fit changing priorities and needs of the organization.