Not exact matches
These higher rates of educational attainment due to the Milwaukee
voucher program represent
improvements of 15 — 20 percent
over the rates obtained by the comparison group of public -
school students — nearly as large as those for the African American students in the New York City study.
The ECT will acknowledge that
School Voucher programs are not 100 % perfect — however we continue to believe (as demonstrated in other States today) that putting Parents in charge with
School Vouchers and market based competition between neighboring
Schools will be a big
improvement over what Colorado has today.
The study found that students from particular demographics were even less likely to use a
voucher: just
over half (51 percent) of high
school students awarded a
voucher used it the next year, and only 63 % of students from «
schools in need of
improvement» (the target students for the program) who recieved a
voucher used it the next year.
However, it addresses so many of NSBA's objectives, such as requiring the U.S. Department of Education to collaborate with local
school leaders and not simply impose its will on them, eliminating the existing one - size - fits - all approach to
school accountability, providing more state and local opportunity to shape workable
school improvement plans, and ensuring state control
over academic standards, while excluding «portability» (i.e.,
vouchers).
Many families may not have the tools to assess which
voucher options are
improvements over public
schools, versus those that are simply online
schools with poor state oversight, like some of the poor - performing charter
schools in Ohio.
A key
improvement of ESAs
over school vouchers and tax credits is that funds not used for K - 12 educational purposes can be «saved» or rolled
over each year and used for continuing or higher education, thus changing the «use it or lose it» mentality in the current public
school funding system.