Voters thought
improving scores on standardized tests was the least important (30 percent extremely important, 32 percent very important).
Although more than half the students who spend an extra year in the same grade and attend summer school
improve their scores on standardized tests, the remaining students held back continue to struggle.
Not exact matches
Finally, in Houston in 2010 — 11, he gave cash incentives to fifth - grade students in 25 low - performing public schools, as well as to the parents and teachers of those students, with the intent of increasing the time they spent
on math homework and
improving their
scores on standardized math
tests.
Eating breakfast
improves academic performance, health, and behavior; that means better performance
on standardized tests,
improved concentration and memory, better math
scores, better attendance and fewer tardies, as well as fewer behavioral referrals to the front office.
In our two previous research collaborations with the Skills for Life team, we already had shown that mental health problems are quite common, are among the strongest predictors of poor attendance, poorer grades, and lower
scores on standardized tests, and that
improved mental health
scores are powerful predictors of
improved academic outcomes.»
The
improved scores were impressive enough to lead several states and other major school districts, including New York, to adopt elements of the Chicago Public Schools (CPS) policy — making student progress toward the next grade dependent
on demonstrated achievement
on standardized tests.
When their parents are involved, kids are more likely to earn higher grades and
score better
on standardized tests; they attend school more regularly, have
improved social skills, and are better behaved in school; and they are more likely to continue their education past high school.
Since NCLB, there has been increased pressure
on such programs to prove their relevance in education by quickly
improving students» grades and
standardized test scores.
As schools narrow their focus
on improving performance
on math and reading
standardized tests, they have greater difficulty justifying taking students out of the classroom for experiences that are not related to
improving those
test scores.
Of these nine options, «
improving students»
scores on standardized achievement
tests» came in last place with 69 percent support (36 percent strongly).
The corporate reform narrative is based
on three assertions, 1) that the collective voice of teachers is unwelcome in the discussion of the direction of education, 2) that a single metric — high stakes
standardized test scores — can discern effective schooling, and 3) that the marketplace and profit motive are the best way to
improve schools.
Proponents, insisting that tying teacher salaries to measurable standards will
improve schools, have instituted a wide variety of incentive plans across the country: Some evaluate teachers based solely
on standardized test scores, some
on teacher skill development; some offer more pay to teachers working in at - risk schools or with at - risk children, or for teaching certain subjects.
This meta - analysis of social and emotional learning interventions (including 213 school - based SEL programs and 270,000 students from rural, suburban and urban areas) showed that social and emotional learning interventions had the following effects
on students ages 5 - 18: decreased emotional distress such as anxiety and depression,
improved social and emotional skills (e.g., self - awareness, self - management, etc.),
improved attitudes about self, others, and school (including higher academic motivation, stronger bonding with school and teachers, and more positive attitudes about school), improvement in prosocial school and classroom behavior (e.g., following classroom rules), decreased classroom misbehavior and aggression, and
improved academic performance (e.g.
standardized achievement
test scores).
In The Four - Day School Week, another School Administrator report, Jack McCoy, deputy director of learning services at the New Mexico Department of Education, said in his district's case attendance for teachers and students
improved while
scores on standardized achievement
tests remained stable.
Students participating in arts - integrated lessons show increased language and math
scores on standardized tests and
improved engagement, motivation, and sense of community (Smithrim and Upitis, 2005).
Later this month, The Times will publish a database of more than 6,000 elementary school teachers ranked by their ability to
improve students»
scores on standardized tests, marking the first time such information had been released publicly.
In general, studies indicated that high - stakes
standardized basic skills
tests led to: a) a narrowing of the curriculum, b) an overemphasis
on basic skills and
test - like instructional methods, c) a reduction in effective instructional time and an increase in time for
test preparation, d) inflated
test scores, and e) pressure
on teachers to
improve test scores (Herman & Golan, 1993; Nolen, Haladyna, & Haas, 1992; Resnick & Resnick, 1992; Shepard, 1991; Shepard & Dougherty, 1991, Smith, 1991; Smith, Edelsky, Draper, Rottenberg, & Cherland, 1990).
From 2008 to 2013, Grattan
improved standardized test scores from 787 to 923 points
on a scale of 1,000, making it one of the district's academically best - performing elementary schools.
academic
test scores improved as much as 10 percent
on national
standardized math and reading
tests.
The dozen educators who stood trial, including five teachers and a principal, were indicted in 2013 after years of questions about how Atlanta students had substantially
improved their
scores on the Criterion - Referenced Competency
Test, a
standardized examination given throughout Georgia.
The Wallace Foundation has produced study results indicating that when, (a) principals focus their efforts
on improving instruction, (b) teachers trust the principal, and (c) the principal works to develop shared leadership within the building, higher
scores on standardized tests of achievement result.
The authors assert that teachers «still don't trust
test scores» and only one in three support rewarding teachers whose students routinely
score higher
on standardized tests; overall, however, teachers think evaluations are
improving.
The single - subject focus was necessary in this case because the focus was
on improving scores on a particular
standardized test.
As a parent, it concerns me that you have required states to expand charter schools, increase
standardized testing overall, tie teacher jobs to
test scores, and turn around schools by firing half or more of the staff, when the overwhelming body of evidence — including that of the research arms of the federal government — is clear that these strategies do not
improve academics overall and can have serious negative effects
on children and their education.
In contrast, external
standardized tests provide teachers with little guidance
on how to
improve student learning when they simply receive numerical
scores on secret
tests months after the students have left school.
Teachers credit the program with renewing their students» interest in science, as well as
improving their
scores on Michigan's
standardized science
tests.
The law freed states to expand the ways they hold schools responsible for
improving student success by adding at least one «nonacademic» indicator to an accountability system primarily based
on standardized tests scores in reading, math and science.
A core component of that system relies
on whether teachers can
improve their student's
standardized test scores.
And they fund the same vehicles to achieve their goals: charter schools, high - stakes
standardized testing for students, merit pay for teachers whose students
improve their
test scores, firing teachers and closing schools when
scores don't rise adequately, and longitudinal data collection
on the performance of every student and teacher.
Lack of proficiency in reading and writing in social studies is exacerbated by the fact that schools are spending far less time
on social studies instruction in the face of increasing pressure to
improve standardized test scores in reading and mathematics (Manzo, 2005).
When NEA surveyed 1,500 pre-K-12 teachers a couple of years ago, more than 40 percent said the emphasis
on improving standardized test scores had a negative impact
on their classroom.
How students perform
on their English, math and science
standardized tests — including how much each student's
scores improved over the previous year's — are the primary driver of a school's
score.
California's Central Valley Networked Improvement Communities seek to
improve fifth - grade mathematics and triple students» math proficiency
on standardized test scores in just four years.
In a study of three districts using standards - based evaluation systems, researchers found significant relationships between teachers» ratings and their students» gain
scores on standardized tests, and evidence that teachers» practice
improved as they were given frequent feedback in relation to the standards.
The constant public focus
on standardized test scores suggests the belief that the threat of sanctions or promise of rewards (mostly in the form of increased funding) will enhance students»
test scores and
improve school quality — that schools can somehow be coerced or seduced into improvement.
After receiving a doctorate degree with a specialization in Knowledge Management from Walden University, Dr. Giorgio returned to a supervisory and curriculum role to work closely with teachers and the curriculum development process in order to
improve student
test scores on state
standardized tests.
For example, classroom concentration, attention, and memory immediately increase after physical activity, and student
test scores correlate positively with regular participation.122 Research has also shown that elementary school students that perform better in reading, mathematics, and science have higher physical fitness
test scores.123 In addition, children who perform below grade level academically and participate in a physical activity program are more likely to
improve their performance
on standardized tests than are their less active peers.124
And when students eat breakfast, the results are pretty spectacular:
Improved academic performance
on standardized tests Improved concentration and memory Better math
scores Better attendance and fewer tardies Fewer trips to the nurse's... Continue reading →
Value - added analysis calculates a teacher's effectiveness in
improving student performance
on standardized tests — based
on past
test scores.
Improving teaching, Hardy told her staff again and again, would
improve learning and raise
scores on standardized tests.
Because they are based
on a narrow measure —
standardized test scores — and don't provide teachers with feedback
on how to
improve, they should be accompanied by other performance measures, the authors said.
However, an over-reliance
on student
standardized test scores for evaluating teacher and principal performance does not take into account
improved student progress in light of challenging circumstances that confront students who come from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Clearly, physical exercise is just one of the necessary ingredients for
improving student
scores on standardized tests.
Improved NJ ASK
standardized test scores on state math and English by 20 % in a one year period by implementing new curriculum.
This meta - analysis of social and emotional learning interventions (including 213 school - based SEL programs and 270,000 students from rural, suburban and urban areas) showed that social and emotional learning interventions had the following effects
on students ages 5 - 18: decreased emotional distress such as anxiety and depression,
improved social and emotional skills (e.g., self - awareness, self - management, etc.),
improved attitudes about self, others, and school (including higher academic motivation, stronger bonding with school and teachers, and more positive attitudes about school), improvement in prosocial school and classroom behavior (e.g., following classroom rules), decreased classroom misbehavior and aggression, and
improved academic performance (e.g.
standardized achievement
test scores).
academic
test scores improved as much as 10 percent
on national
standardized math and reading
tests.