Sentences with phrase «in abiogenesis»

Disbelief in an creator requires belief in abiogenesis or some other unlikely hypothesis, ``... 14bn years is a very short time in biological terms.

Jim, Do you believe in Abiogenesis?

Jim, if you do believe in Abiogenesis «Your entire world view is based on an obvious work of fiction and you have been duped and self deluded enough to believe it.»

Not exact matches

In every class I've taken, abiogenesis is taught as a hypothesis.

At this time no one knows with any certainty as to how abiogenesis happened, but you may feel it was god, but I would imagine that at some time in the future science will have a working hypothesis.it most likely does already I am am not sure.

You are talking about abiogenesis, which is not contained in the theory of evolution.

Out in meat space, I think that's how most Christians think of evolution — especially as evolutionary biology makes no assertions in regards to abiogenesis.

In 1864, Louis Pasteur proved that point in one case, showing that spontaneous generation (that life could originate from nonliving matter, also called abiogenesis), though accepted by some in the scientific community (such as Belgian chemist Jan Baptist van Helmont about 200 years earlier, who also believed that the basic elements of the universe was just air and water), was untruIn 1864, Louis Pasteur proved that point in one case, showing that spontaneous generation (that life could originate from nonliving matter, also called abiogenesis), though accepted by some in the scientific community (such as Belgian chemist Jan Baptist van Helmont about 200 years earlier, who also believed that the basic elements of the universe was just air and water), was untruin one case, showing that spontaneous generation (that life could originate from nonliving matter, also called abiogenesis), though accepted by some in the scientific community (such as Belgian chemist Jan Baptist van Helmont about 200 years earlier, who also believed that the basic elements of the universe was just air and water), was untruin the scientific community (such as Belgian chemist Jan Baptist van Helmont about 200 years earlier, who also believed that the basic elements of the universe was just air and water), was untrue.

Having examined evidence such as Big Bang cosmology (yup, I'm what you'd call an «old earth» creationist), the Cambrian explosion in the fossil record, the problems of abiogenesis, and textual criticism of the Bible, I've found that the Bible describes historical events and other aspects of reality much more plausibly than any other faith system.

There were words in his book, like «abiogenesis,» that now he could not define.

After spending years studying quantum physics what causes me the most side splitting rounds of laughter is when someone with no foundation attempts to explain «life» in terms of abiogenesis dealing strictly with already complex atomic structure.

Actually the process of abiogenesis is quite simple in complexity and is quite easy to understand.

When you talk about the origins of life it is abiogenesis, and the beginnings of the universe is in the realm of cosmology.

There are a few theories that are being tossed around in terms of explanations for abiogenesis and cosmology.

@Colin «Life on Earth likely began through a long process of abiogenesis, culminating in unicellular procaryotic bacteria» @Chad «ah..

Life on Earth likely began through a long process of abiogenesis, culminating in unicellular procaryotic bacteria.

I don't want to trivialize the problem of abiogenesis, but it's my suspicion that because matter self - organizes in the presence of energy, the phase of matter we call «life» will appear everywhere it's possible, not as a singular event, but continuously across the galaxies.