Proctor, a professor of the history of science at Stanford, is one of the world's leading experts
in agnotology, a neologism signifying the study of the cultural production of ignorance.
Coming back to «bogan», the big issue
in agnotology is not ignorance in the ordinary sense of the term (people who don't know much about political issues, and don't care to learn — that is certainly part of the stereotypical bogan image, and may perhaps be descriptive of the actual demographic groups commonly associated with the term, though I don't know of any evidence of this).
In the latest volley, from Legates et al 2013, John Cook's «97 % consensus» survey has become the case study
in agnotology.
Raising Climate Literacy through Addressing Misinformation: Case Studies
in Agnotology - Based Learning.
In Agnotology: The Cultural Production of Ignorance, edited by Robert Proctor, and Londa Schiebinger, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Not exact matches
Agnotology has been defined
in a variety of ways including «the study of ignorance and its cultural production» and «the study of how and why ignorance or misunderstanding exists.»
More recently, however, it has been posited that
agnotology should be used
in the teaching of climate change science.
So,
in the spirit of adventure, I'm going to step away from my usual program of soft and fluffy topics like the bubbliness of bitcoins, the uselessness of navies and the
agnotology of climate denial, and tackle the thorny question of running vs walking.
The new paper, itself being an
agnotology, seems to be a good example of what they're trying to describe
in their paper.
«Robert N. Proctor, who coined the term «
agnotology» to describe the study of culturally induced ignorance or doubt, wrote
in American Scientist that Merchants of Doubt is a detailed and artfully written book.
Fran Barlow, since the topic is on «the significance of
agnotology» and given my limited knowledge on the subject matter and the fact I love my latte, maybe there is a link between the Tea Party, David H. Koch and the tea herbal smoke shops
in Houston.
It's the context
in which one can begin to make sense of what has been called
agnotology or epistemic closure.
Leaving aside the class / cultural analysis implicit
in the term «bogan», which I think is wrong, the argument is the same as I made
in my post on
agnotology, as his characterization of Rudd as a technocrat, not really at ease with the kind of politics that includes demands for authenticity and so on.
An interesting (and influential, at least
in my case) paper on this topic is
Agnotology as a teaching tool: Learning climate science by studying misinformation by Daniel Bedford, a professor at Weber State University, Utah.
The talk was titled Applying
Agnotology Based Learning
in a MOOC to Counter Climate Misconceptions.
In 2009, Dan Bedford coined the term «
agnotology - based learning».
Recently, David Legates, Willie Soon and William Briggs published a paper
in the journal Science & Education, Learning and Teaching Climate Science: The Perils of Consensus Knowledge Using
Agnotology.
«a very early use of the new word
agnotology, if not its coining, in an article by Linda Schiebinger titled Agnotology and Exotic Abortifacients: The Cultural Production of Ignorance in the Eighteenth Century Atlantic
agnotology, if not its coining,
in an article by Linda Schiebinger titled
Agnotology and Exotic Abortifacients: The Cultural Production of Ignorance in the Eighteenth Century Atlantic
Agnotology and Exotic Abortifacients: The Cultural Production of Ignorance
in the Eighteenth Century Atlantic World....
In terms of the cultural component of
agnotology, this may well be worth considering: