Sentences with phrase «in biblical exegesis»

They think it's a clobbering verse against gay people but all it takes is a marginal education in Biblical Exegesis to understand the verses you so eloquently listed with such immaturity means something other than what you are thinking.

The illuminations themselves are complex exercises in biblical exegesis that send us back to the words with fresh eyes.

In the biblical exegesis of the early Church the method had a real value.

CULTURAL EXEGESIS Most pastors get A's or B's in biblical exegesis, but they get C's and D's in cultural exegesis.

Not exact matches

His work ranges widely in systematic and moral theology and biblical exegesis.

Forms of exegesis or biblical interpretation that do not support the homiletic, evangelical, and educational missions of the Church may have their place in the academy, but they are subsets of religious studies, not theology.

Knust shows absolutely no awareness of Biblical exegesis, hermeneutics, genre, social and historical context, or even a rudimentary understanding of what's prescriptive or descriptive text in some of the historical Biblical narratives.

And all of these others have also based their views on careful exegesis of the biblical text, in its grammatical, cultural, historical contexts.

Until that late period in my theological studies I had been unable to make much sense of biblical exegesis.

Traditionally the term was used primarily for exegesis of the Bible; however, in contemporary usage it has broadened to mean a critical explanation of any text, and the term «Biblical exegesis» is used for greater specificity.

But in the meantime, Dan put his own frustration to work and created this handy «Year of Biblical Womanhood Genre Cheat Sheet» for those who may be confused by literary genres and do not know the difference between, say, satire and biblical eBiblical Womanhood Genre Cheat Sheet» for those who may be confused by literary genres and do not know the difference between, say, satire and biblical ebiblical exegesis.

Other projects include an exploration of motherhood in messianic genealogies in «Mother Knows Best: Messianic Surrogacy and Sexploitation in Ruth» in Mother Goose, Mother Jones, Mommie Dearest: Biblical Mothers and their Children (Brill), and a commentary on Ruth and article on «Responsible Christian exegesis of the Hebrew Scriptures» in the African diasporic biblical commentary The Africana Bible (FoBiblical Mothers and their Children (Brill), and a commentary on Ruth and article on «Responsible Christian exegesis of the Hebrew Scriptures» in the African diasporic biblical commentary The Africana Bible (Fobiblical commentary The Africana Bible (Fortress).

Doing a New Testament word study on the Greek word «praus» in order to better understand what Peter means when he instructs women to have a «gentle and quiet spirit» in 1 Peter 3:3 - 4 is biblical exegesis.

That's a lot of biblical exegesis to defend a Bible you don't have a lot of faith in.

This could be illustrated, in many ways; one example involves both biblical exegesis and traditional doctrine.

This is a complex and not easily definable issue and anyone with «easy» answers in my view is not admitting the fallen and terrible condition of mankind in general and that as much as we would attempt to make categorical statements as to «all war is wrong» or «war is the right soultion» we are making statements that just cant stand up to either biblical exegesis or the reality of the world we live in.

Within the frame work of the general biblical knowledge, students were given systematic training in the exegesis of the biblical passages after the manner of «the Great Interpreter», Theodore of Mopsuestia, whose sober, literal textual interpretations were always the Nestorian model.

But only through an openness to Biblical scholarship and a willingness to undertake fresh exegesis can that authoritative message be heard in our day.

Critical historical exegesis during the past hundred years has undoubtedly aided unprecedented advancements in our biblical knowledge: in the better understanding of literary genres, source history and textual composition; in etymology and archaeology; in the penetration of ancient languages and cultural settings.

[9] Ratzinger, J. On the Question of the Foundations and approaches of Exegesis Today, in Biblical Interpretation in Crisis: The Rat ^ tnger Conference on the Bible and the Church, ed.

[5] Ratzinger, J. On the Question of the Foundations and Approaches of Exegesis Today, in Biblical Interpretation in Crisis: The Ratyinger Conference on the Bible and the Church, ed.

Almost twenty years ago Joseph Ratzinger observed: Modern exegesis, as we have seen, completely relegated God to the incomprehensible, the otherworldly, and the inexpressible in order to be able to treat the biblical text itself as an entirely worldly reality according to natural - scientific methods.

In the third part we will have recourse to the exegesis of testimony in the biblical prophets and in the New TestamenIn the third part we will have recourse to the exegesis of testimony in the biblical prophets and in the New Testamenin the biblical prophets and in the New Testamenin the New Testament.

The concept of testimony such as is drawn out by biblical exegesis, is hermeneutical in a double sense.

His Israel of God in Prophecy and Chariots of Salvation are two books that stick particularly to the Bible In both books he remains true to an exegesis that is rooted in the OT and NT Scriptures making it possible for the Christian to understand what has otherwise been an eschatological landscape filled with clouds of personal prognostications that masquerade as Biblicain Prophecy and Chariots of Salvation are two books that stick particularly to the Bible In both books he remains true to an exegesis that is rooted in the OT and NT Scriptures making it possible for the Christian to understand what has otherwise been an eschatological landscape filled with clouds of personal prognostications that masquerade as BiblicaIn both books he remains true to an exegesis that is rooted in the OT and NT Scriptures making it possible for the Christian to understand what has otherwise been an eschatological landscape filled with clouds of personal prognostications that masquerade as Biblicain the OT and NT Scriptures making it possible for the Christian to understand what has otherwise been an eschatological landscape filled with clouds of personal prognostications that masquerade as Biblical.

Dale Vree came back in the New Oxford Review with an article titled «If Everyone Is Saved...,» defending Regis Scanlon and rejecting Neuhaus» exegesis of the biblical texts he had quoted.

[18] Manlio Simonetti, Biblical Interpretation in the Early Church: An Historical Introduction to Patristic Exegesis, trans.

An ancient rabbinic method of exegesis called midrash, which sought out and inevitably found the solution to problems perceived in the biblical text, resulted in the creation of an abundant mythology that eventually took on a life of its own.

In typical N. T. Wright fashion, this book pairs probing questions with insightful biblical exegesis resulting in a thought - provoking book that is well worth the reaIn typical N. T. Wright fashion, this book pairs probing questions with insightful biblical exegesis resulting in a thought - provoking book that is well worth the reain a thought - provoking book that is well worth the read.

Modern exegesis, as we have seen, completely relegated God to the incomprehensible, the otherworldly, and the inexpressible in order to be able to treat the biblical text itself as an entirely worldly reality according to natural - scientific methods.

In a well - crafted introductory essay, Selderhuis places Reformation exegesis of the Psalms within the wider context of biblical interpretation.

In his exegesis of certain biblical texts, notably Psalm 110:1 and Isaiah 53:1, Tertullian observed: «So in these texts the distinctness of the three is plainly set out, for there is the Spirit who makes the statement, the Father to whom he addresses it, and the Son who is the subject of it.&raquIn his exegesis of certain biblical texts, notably Psalm 110:1 and Isaiah 53:1, Tertullian observed: «So in these texts the distinctness of the three is plainly set out, for there is the Spirit who makes the statement, the Father to whom he addresses it, and the Son who is the subject of it.&raquin these texts the distinctness of the three is plainly set out, for there is the Spirit who makes the statement, the Father to whom he addresses it, and the Son who is the subject of it.»

Biblical scholars also worry that theological exegesis will divert attention away from the Bible in its particularity.

Fruitful as this work may be, however, Collins makes the unwarranted assumption that modern biblical study is intrinsically antithetical to theological exegesis when in fact only the historical - critical claim to final interpretive authority contradicts a theological approach.

Without casting Enlightenment rationalism as categorically evil, Wright details some of the problematic consequences of Enlightenment assumptions regarding the biblical text: false claims to absolute objectivity, the elevation of «reason» («not as an insistence that exegesis must make sense with an overall view of God and the wider world,» Wright notes, «but as a separate «source» in its own right»), reductive and skeptical readings of scripture that cast Christianity as out - of - date and irrelevant, a human - based eschatology that fosters a «we - know - better - now» attitude toward the text, a reframing of the problem of evil as a mere failure to be rational, the reduction of the act of God in Jesus Christ to a mere moral teacher, etc..

The foundations of Hebrew philology and biblical exegesis were laid by Jewish scholars in the early Middle Ages, and carried forward by Christian scholars from the Renaissance to the present.

For Jewish fundamentalism, it is not the literal meaning of the biblical text that is normative, but the rabbinic exegesis embodied in the Talmud and the Midrash.

Whether I am capable (some would say, guilty) of such conventional accoutrements of scholarship readers could judge from my thesis («The Testament of Job: Introduction, Translation, and Notes,» Harvard Ph. D. thesis, 197I) or from an article in the Merrill C. Tenneyfestschrifi, «The Limits of Ecstasy: An Exegesis Of 2 Corinthians 12:1 - 10,» in Current Issues in Biblical and Patristic Interpretation, ed.

Like Briscoe's work, the book is helpful in modeling an expository approach to exegesis and biblical preaching with a focus on individual application.

There was much theological disputation but little arbitration in terms of doctrinal consistency or proper Biblical exegesis.

In part three of the section dealing with «Relationship with Other Theological Disciplines», entitled «Exegesis and Moral Theology» the text of the Pontifical Biblical Commission states:

One finds a similar sympathy for precritical exegesis in a volume of essays on sixteenth - century exegesis and interpretation: Biblical Interpretation in the Era of the Reformation, edited by Richard A. Muller and John L. Thompson.

And studying good exegesis, good Biblical theology, and good philosophical and systematic theology increases my faith my and my apprehension of God's infinite love for me and for everyone in the world.

The appeal to the «superiority» of premodern biblical exegesis is best understood as a protest against the reductionism inherent in the long - standing monopoly of the historical - critical method, not as a rejection of rigorous historical study of the Bible.

But the «rootedness» of the historic churches is offset by a sorry record concerning faithfulness to an honest scriptural exegesis based on the original intent of the biblical writer or writers in question.

The artists included in this section include an anonymous medieval wood carving from the 15th century to the hagiographic Catherine of Alexandria by Antonio Alonso Villamor (17th Century) to the contemporary «virgins» and «martyrs» by Elena Kovylina, Shirin Neshat, Charlie White, Simon Periton, Xan Medina, Nezaket Ekici, John Brophy, Carlos Aires, Djamel Tatah, Cristina Lucas, and Nicola Verlato; they all reveal in their work the shift from the biblical and idyllic image towards a more earthly woman that combats and questions in an active manner that which Carla Ricci defined as «the exegesis of silence» imposed by the holy writings.

As a ministry student at Baylor University, student at Dallas Theological Seminary and doctoral student in Biblical Counseling and Women's studies at Trinity seminary, I am well equipped to dig deep into scripture and theology having taken courses in Greek, Old and New Testament, Systematic Theology, Evangelism, Homelitics and Exegesis, and Spiritual Life as well as Biblical Conflict Resolution, Family Counseling and Women's Issues.