Not exact matches
Some, like Yoram Hazony
in his»
Biblical Case for Limited Government,» have even offered sophisticated (if
in the end limited) arguments for why a restricted
role for government is itself a Judeo - Christian value.
It would place the Church
in the
role of gently but firmly pointing out violations of
biblical law and predicting the consequences, while seeking to live out its own profession before the world, showing God's glory
in the wholesome, restrained, but ultimately satisfying outcomes it would demonstrate.
Whether
biblical or national, they are there because of their providential
roles in history, to be remembered, for honors, but hopefully also for flaws and sins needing divine grace.
Support for Israel has become a key issue for American evangelicals, some of whom believe the country plays a key
role in end times and others who believe there's a
biblical mandate to honor the Jewish state.
The twenty - first - century Church owes a lot to twentieth - century German Catholicism: for its generosity to Catholics
in the Third World; for the witness of martyrs like Alfred Delp, Bernhard Lichtenberg, and Edith Stein; for its contributions to
Biblical studies, systematic and moral theology, liturgical renewal, and Catholic social doctrine, through which German Catholicism played a leading
role in Vatican II's efforts to renew Catholic witness for the third millennium.
Nevertheless, the possibility of a coherent quantum theory based on process thought is,
in principle, important for the project of recovering a comprehensive vision
in which a
biblical understanding of God finds an important
role.
The initiative has sparked a campus - wide debate about
biblical interpretation and the
roles of women, as well as a second group called Students for Egalitarianism
in Marriage.
Obviously, I'm a big advocate for mutual submission
in marriage, as that is what I believe those
biblical passages ultimately teach and this is what works best
in our marriage, but more important than adopting a single household model — either patriarchal or egalitarian — is adopting the posture of Jesus Christ, who emptied himself of power and took the
role of servant.
And the book also offers a deliberately wide array of approaches to trinitarian issues, including not only historical and systematic theologians, but
biblical scholars and analytic philosophers of religion, writing from a variety of theological and communal points of view» Roman Catholic, Protestant, and,
in one case, Jewish (the New Testament scholar Alan Segal, who contributes an instructive if somewhat technical chapter on the
role of conflicts between Jews and Christians
in the emergence of early trinitarian teaching).
Even though Dr. Spencer laid a strong
biblical foundation for the
role of women
in ministry based on the New Testament, I still lived with the fear of once again being silenced by the church.
The theological
role of the Bible is controversial
in many Quaker circles, especially since Quakerism acts as a last desperate handhold for many Christians who feel abused by
Biblical literalism and fundamentalism.
In that role the statement is likely to be read more in terms of its main drift toward biblical theology than in terms of the slight affirmation it accords other theological program
In that
role the statement is likely to be read more
in terms of its main drift toward biblical theology than in terms of the slight affirmation it accords other theological program
in terms of its main drift toward
biblical theology than
in terms of the slight affirmation it accords other theological program
in terms of the slight affirmation it accords other theological programs.
My goal is to make readers first laugh, and then think, about the ways
in which we invoke the phrase «
biblical womanhood,» because I believe both the Bible and womanhood are more complex than a list of rules and acceptable
roles.
Afro - centric interpretation has drawn attention to the historical
role played by African countries (especially Egypt and Ethiopia) and by Africans
in the
biblical text.
This approach appeals to many people, although it does not seem to do complete justice to the
biblical accounts / expectations of the resurrection of the dead, and it seems to minimize God's active
role in the process.
As primary actors
in the speaker's drama they stage
in pulpits, chancels, or at Table, preachers first play
roles in the speaker's dramas present
in the canon as
biblical texts.
Stephen B. Clark, Man and Woman
in Christ (Ann Arbor: Servant, 1980); James B. Hurley, Man and Woman
in Biblical Perspective (Leicester) InterVarsity Press; Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1981); George W Knight III, The New Testament Teaching on the
Role Relationship of Men and Women (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1977); Fritz Zerbst, The Office of Woman
in the Church (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1955); Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark), III 1, pp. 288 - 329, section 41 (1958); III 2, pp. 285 - 316, section 45 (1960); III 4, pp. 116 - 240, section 54 (1961).
As long as Christianity had to play — or allowed itself to play — the
role of Western culture - religion, the nomenclature «Christian» was obliged to stand for all sorts of dispositions extraneous or tangential
in relation to
biblical faith.
Does such a critical, yet faithful, approach as that outlined above imply that only the expert can arrive at an adequate
Biblical understanding of the
role of women
in the church and family?
The proper
role for the study of the diachronic dimensions of the text lies not
in fragmenting or
in replacing the synchronic level, but
in using a recovery of a depth dimension for increasing an understanding of the theological substance that constitutes the
biblical narrative itself.
The writings of Harold Lindsell, Francis Schaefer, Bernard Ramm, Carl Henry, Clark Pinnock, Dick France, James Packer and others present a range of contradictory theological formulations on such issues as the nature of
Biblical inspiration, the place of women
in the church and family, the church's
role in social ethics, and the Christian's response to homosexuality.
As we turn
in the next chapter to consider the evangelical church's
role in society, we will see that matters of a correct theological understanding of social ethics - one resting
in Biblical authority - do not hinge so much on the issue of
Biblical hermeneutics as they do on the matter of conflicting loyalties to ecclesiological traditions.
Evangelicals, all claiming a common
Biblical norm, are reaching contradictory theological formulations on many of the major issues they address — the nature of
Biblical inspiration, the place of women
in the church and family, the church's
role in social ethics, and most recently the Christian's response to homosexuality.
The second point to make... turns on the theological
role of the editors
in shaping the
biblical material to render it
in light of the larger literary collection.
While
Biblical hermeneutics provided the key to an understanding of the
role of women
in the church and family, dialogue between those whose traditions have heard the Word of God differently
in other times and places held the key for the discussion of social ethics, and engagement with the full range of cultural activity (from psychotherapy to radical protest, from personal testimony to scientific statement) was the locus for theological evaluation concerning homosexuality.
He believes
biblical manhood and womanhood requires sticking to traditional gender
roles in the home, and has said that stay - at - home fathers and men who take on domestic duties are «man fails.»
«Because I first heard Rachel's voice
in reaction to public tomfoolery about women's
roles in the church and society, I half - expected A Year of
Biblical Womanhood to be sort of... reactionary.
There is overwhelming
biblical scholarship for the full equality of women and that the interpretation of scripture to exclude women from
roles by gender (rather than gifting) has been found to be rooted
in patriarchy, an ancient worldview that became intertwined
in the growth and doctrine of the church.
Both the
biblical and philosophical humanisms that emerged
in the first and second centuries C.E. were fostered by and responded to two enormous social changes: new discrepancies of status (the same person could occupy more than one
role in a pluralistic and mobile society), and the downward mobility of values.
Their
biblical commitments would not allow them to deny God's
role in history, but the pressure of Greek metaphysics worked against this.
It might be instructive to compare the
role that
biblical criticism played
in the demystification of the Bible, with that of the Kinsey reports
in the demystification of sex.
For a time
biblical criticism played a creative
role in genuine liberation and individuation, insofar as its «agentic» function was dialectically related to what Bakan calls «the communion function,» that is, the process by which separation is finally overcome.
In the vast sweep of secularization,
biblical criticism played an essential
role vis - a-vis the demystification of the religious tradition.
Those studies become less and less an occupation engaged
in or intrinsic to his
role as witness to the gospel and pastor to people, and become more and more frantic efforts to find
biblical, or theological, generalities which will religiously dignify his promotional purposes.
Because we disagree on the proper method of baptism, the
role of women
in the church or the proper interpretation of a certain
Biblical passage does not make one of us correct and the other a «false teacher».
A canonical approach,
in Brevard Childs» words, «interprets the
biblical text
in relation to a community of faith and practice for whom it served a particular theological
role as possessing divine authority.»
Biblical scholars concerned with the roles of men and women in biblical cultures point out that the love ethic of the early church was so revolutionary in its day that it was considered a threat to social order in the Roman
Biblical scholars concerned with the
roles of men and women
in biblical cultures point out that the love ethic of the early church was so revolutionary in its day that it was considered a threat to social order in the Roman
biblical cultures point out that the love ethic of the early church was so revolutionary
in its day that it was considered a threat to social order
in the Roman Empire.
The
biblical implication appears to be that, while our paid
roles may change when we reach retirement, we should continue to play a key part
in ministry, particularly
in building up and investing
in the next generation.
This policy statement first reviews the
biblical and theological basis, then looks at the
role of the church, the influence of communication technologies and resources, regulation of a public resource
in the public interest, the proglrm of concentration of media ownership and control, and the impace of global media on indigenous cultures.
He said: «The Islamic texts, like
Biblical texts, can be misinterpreted...» Mosques, he said, have a key
role in educating the young to interpret the Koran properly.
The language of Antioch, where
biblical images played a larger
role than
in Alexandria, was of the Word indwelling Jesus.
I think Jüngel's dual
role as theologian and
biblical scholar stood him very well
in calling attention to the importance of this insight
in the
biblical narrative.
The present day situation of women indeed calls for a new
biblical hermeneutics to make the scripture relevant to the changing situations and to rediscover what the New Testament says on women's
role in Christian ministry.15
In my own case, it was not only Tillich plus Troeltsch with his sometime roommate Max Weber and Adams with his colleague George H. Williams who were influential, but also Walter Rauschenbusch's use of the social analysis of his day to restate biblical themes; Reinhold Niebuhr's refutation in The Nature and Destiny of Man of Marx's, Kant's, Nietzsche's and Freud's understanding of human nature; Talcott Parsons's systematic study of the role of religious values in The Structure of Social Action; George Ernest Wright's exposition of the Prophets; and Masatoshi Nagatomi's gentle introduction to Asian modes of though
In my own case, it was not only Tillich plus Troeltsch with his sometime roommate Max Weber and Adams with his colleague George H. Williams who were influential, but also Walter Rauschenbusch's use of the social analysis of his day to restate
biblical themes; Reinhold Niebuhr's refutation
in The Nature and Destiny of Man of Marx's, Kant's, Nietzsche's and Freud's understanding of human nature; Talcott Parsons's systematic study of the role of religious values in The Structure of Social Action; George Ernest Wright's exposition of the Prophets; and Masatoshi Nagatomi's gentle introduction to Asian modes of though
in The Nature and Destiny of Man of Marx's, Kant's, Nietzsche's and Freud's understanding of human nature; Talcott Parsons's systematic study of the
role of religious values
in The Structure of Social Action; George Ernest Wright's exposition of the Prophets; and Masatoshi Nagatomi's gentle introduction to Asian modes of though
in The Structure of Social Action; George Ernest Wright's exposition of the Prophets; and Masatoshi Nagatomi's gentle introduction to Asian modes of thought.
Fortress, which was one division of the Lutheran Church
in America's separately incorporated Board of Publication, under two decades of strong leadership has drawn on wide European connections to build a high - quality program (especially strong
in biblical studies and theology) that has had a central
role in Protestant publishing.
The lecturer was setting forth a
biblical perspective on the
role of government, with special attention to the Pauline text
in Romans 13.
In fact, 1Timothy 2 appear in a list of «key texts» on the CBMW site and is commonly cited as biblical justification for limiting the roles of women in church leadershi
In fact, 1Timothy 2 appear
in a list of «key texts» on the CBMW site and is commonly cited as biblical justification for limiting the roles of women in church leadershi
in a list of «key texts» on the CBMW site and is commonly cited as
biblical justification for limiting the
roles of women
in church leadershi
in church leadership.
This happens whenever a woman is presented with a universal statement about the «
biblical»
role of women
in the world, which is typically extrapolated from a single
biblical text without regard to literary or historical context and followed by a parenthetical string of additional unrelated and out - of - context Bible verses for support.
Matthew again returns to what no good
biblical scholar would dispute: that many of the gender
roles alluded to
in Scripture are rooted
in patriarchy.
I wanted to challenge the idea that «
biblical womanhood» could be reduced to a list of
roles and rules, and I wanted to do it
in a creative, disarming way.