Sentences with phrase «in biblical text»

The definition «you» provided of being Christian is not quoted in Biblical text.

He would likely modify Jesus» parable of Lazarus and the rich man, concluding with the statement: «If they do not listen to Moses and the prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone's computer sees Maimonides or Billy Graham hidden in the biblical text.»

It is not the precision of philology but the politics of rhetoric that controls the choice of terms to describe such phenomena in the biblical text.

It surely is not in the biblical text.

Again, the narrative itself, as read by the sympathetic and sensitive reader, constitutes its own best commentary; and again, therefore, we call brief attention to points in the biblical text which, in our judgment, ought to be specially noted:

Never in any Biblical text does it ever say God wants all ppl to be exactly the same.

A common objection is that the Bible is unreliable because it has been altered from (a now unavailable) original which would have been identical in teaching to the Quran, and this is evidenced by variant readings in the biblical text.

An ancient rabbinic method of exegesis called midrash, which sought out and inevitably found the solution to problems perceived in the biblical text, resulted in the creation of an abundant mythology that eventually took on a life of its own.

He must, for instance, make up his mind about what is «true» in the Biblical text, and what is only «temporary» — i.e. to be interpreted in the light of the world view or the religious environment of the age.

The emphasis in «process hermeneutics» on texts as proposals led Kelsey to wonder whether the cluster of «propositions» (understood in the distinctively Whiteheadian sense) in a Biblical text are what in Scripture are normative for theology.

But in the biblical text, this laissez - faire attitude is a contradiction of the gospel.

If you don't like to think about the violence in the biblical text, you might want to ask yourself why...

As long as sinners and Satan live, sin will exist and that is not what I see in the Biblical text.

The joy of self - discovery in the biblical text leads directly to the joy of teaching the text to others.

will and capacity for liberation, reconciliation and new life is everywhere in the biblical text.

In each case, Childs's point is that in the biblical text one can see the canonical interpreters themselves reworking older material in order to make fresh, normative theological claims that move decisively beyond the locus of the early text.

Daniel Fuller believes that in non-revelatory matters, there is «error» in the Biblical text which was included deliberately by the authors in order to communicate effectively with their readers.

Other feminists, more critical of the Bible itself, have attempted to expose and analyze the patriarchal elements in the biblical text in order to show how the patriarchal values can be separated from the essentially liberating values that form its primary message.

Afro - centric interpretation has drawn attention to the historical role played by African countries (especially Egypt and Ethiopia) and by Africans in the biblical text.

My problems with this book are the same problems I have with nearly all books about biblical criticism: I believe the presuppositions of most of those who engage in biblical criticism are inherently flawed, and as a result, short - circuit the creative thinking that is necessary to discover solutions to the so - called problems in the biblical text.

It has been suggested that this anachronism in the biblical text is akin to importing semitrailers into the medieval period.

Indeed, visions of Mary's virtue have been amplified though the centuries, far beyond what we find in the biblical text.

It is all so outdated for the human race... I don't understand why so many people need such strong faith in a biblical text to carry out their lives happily and productively.

Scientists may ultimately tell us how and when everything happened in ways not articulated in the biblical text, but science will never be able to tell us why.

It finds a ready home in the biblical text that curiously» even in its most archaic past» chose not to consign all the righteous to the underworld.

Three: If process hermeneutics is important to process theology in order to make clear its rootage in Scripture, is process hermeneutics able to provide any guidance to what is normative in Biblical texts?

In truth, there is nothing in the biblical texts that is beyond debate and questioning, and healthy churches should welcome it.

The Bible speaks about the transformation of selves by the acts of God: thus the psychological realities coming to expression in the biblical texts may be either descriptions of the imprisonment of the self needing release, or those of the liberated, transformed person.

The Greek word used in the biblical texts which use this word is dokimos.

«Where else in the world do you find non-Christians so engrossed in biblical texts?»

Is the proper legacy of the historical - critical method a continued concern for intentionality in biblical texts not so much in precanonical but rather in final scriptural form?

5) Human sexuality in Biblical texts is also portrayed in terms of qualities of relationship such as faithfulness, love, obligation, and justice.

Obviously, the specific deity claimed to exist in Biblical texts is disproved automatically by the contradictions in the dogma.

Mention of tongue tie can be found even in Biblical texts (Mark 7:35 is thought to be in reference to a tongue tie being released), which goes to show they have been a concern for at least a few thousand years.

Not exact matches

Patrick was immersed in the language and thought of Scripture, and Moore provides alongside the text the biblical references, as well as unobtrusive footnotes explaining historical obscurities.

If you're interested in self - inquiry there are a lot of psychological texts written in recent years when the science was far, far in advance of anything understood about humans back in biblical times.

Almost all the stories surrounding Jesus (if he did exist, some scholars say their is no proof of a historical Jesus) were borrowed from earlier myths and used word for word... as well as the rampant literary corruption and forgeries of Biblical Texts... It is also impossible for God to exist in the Christian version or form they created.

It was never originally written in Latin, only translated... the first translation by St. Jerome — the Vulgate which was a translation of a group of biblical texts known as the Vetus Latina.

In the Biblical Manuscript P72, dating from 175 - 200AD, and containing the entire text of 1 Peter, 2 Peter, and Jude, in this, we find 2 Peter 1:1 — ``... our God and Savior, Jesus Christ...» proving that the deity of Jesus was NOT a construct of Emperor Constantine (Roman Emperor from 306 - 337) as was proclaimed by Dan Brown in his book «The DaVinci Code,» but rather, this was a central teaching of the disciples from day In the Biblical Manuscript P72, dating from 175 - 200AD, and containing the entire text of 1 Peter, 2 Peter, and Jude, in this, we find 2 Peter 1:1 — ``... our God and Savior, Jesus Christ...» proving that the deity of Jesus was NOT a construct of Emperor Constantine (Roman Emperor from 306 - 337) as was proclaimed by Dan Brown in his book «The DaVinci Code,» but rather, this was a central teaching of the disciples from day in this, we find 2 Peter 1:1 — ``... our God and Savior, Jesus Christ...» proving that the deity of Jesus was NOT a construct of Emperor Constantine (Roman Emperor from 306 - 337) as was proclaimed by Dan Brown in his book «The DaVinci Code,» but rather, this was a central teaching of the disciples from day in his book «The DaVinci Code,» but rather, this was a central teaching of the disciples from day 1.

How come testimony and doc - umentation is valid in our court systems today but not when we apply it to the biblical text?

Knust shows absolutely no awareness of Biblical exegesis, hermeneutics, genre, social and historical context, or even a rudimentary understanding of what's prescriptive or descriptive text in some of the historical Biblical narratives.

In this work he commented one by one on all his writings, giving details about the date and circumstances of the work, noting places where he had changed his mind, pointing out passages where he got things wrong, for example where he had cited a biblical text from memory and not gotten it correct.

This new version is, in my view, much stronger, appealing both to Biblical texts and SBC precedents.

Beginning with Friedrich Schleiermacher in a letter published in 1807, biblical textual critics and scholars examining the texts fail to find their vocabulary and literary style similar to Paul's unquestionably authentic letters, fail to fit the life situation of Paul in the epistles into Paul's reconstructed biography, and identify principles of the emerged Christian church rather than those of the apostolic generation.

Is there a place for historical criticism in Islam, the kind of criticism Western scholars started applying to the biblical text in the l8thcentury?

The Protestant Reformation was not a reinterpretation of the Biblical texts, rather, it was a return to proper Biblical teaching after the Council of Nicea in 325 created the hellish religion of Roman Catholicism.

And all of these others have also based their views on careful exegesis of the biblical text, in its grammatical, cultural, historical contexts.

As a scholar of the biblical languages, Peterson was frustrated that his parishioners in Maryland couldn't see how revolutionary the text was, during their Bible study classes.

Sameth has based his arguments on his left - of - center sex ideology, and not at all on a credible historical reading of the biblical text in context.

No rational person makes decisions based on such distorted logic in any other area of life, and decisions regarding the textual veracity of the Biblical text should not be an exception to that rule.