He is an Adjunct Professor
in Criminal Trial Advocacy at the University of Ottawa Law School, Common Law Faculty.
* Certified
in Criminal Trial Advocacy by the Florida Board of Legal Specialization, under the jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court.
Not exact matches
The diversity of Andy's law practice is reflected
in the variety of courses he has taught as a long - time member of the University of Maryland School of Law's adjunct faculty, including Torts,
Criminal Law, Evidence, Civil Procedure,
Trial Practice, and Appellate
Advocacy.
As one of the finest
trial lawyers
in the Commonwealth, Max's vast experience litigating complex
criminal and civil cases and his pre-eminence as a
trial attorney strengthen our firm's commitment to providing the highest level of
trial advocacy to our clients.
She has represented numerous individuals
in both the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York
in both
criminal and civil matters and has experience
in all phases of the litigation process
in white collar and federal
criminal matters, as well as government and internal investigations, including pre-indictment
advocacy, grand jury investigations, complex bail proceedings, pretrial motions, motions
in limine, jury selection,
trials, sentencing, restitution, forfeiture, and other post-conviction proceedings.
Trial Advocacy General Litigation of Civil Personal Injury and
Criminal Actions
in all New Jersey Superior and Municipal Courts
Trial and Appellate Practice Motion Practice Numerous Civil and
Criminal Superior Court jury
trials to verdict
in addition to appearances before the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court as well as the New Jersey Supreme Court.
In addition to his work as a
trial and appellate lawyer, Solomon is also a sessional professor at the University of Ottawa Faculty of Law, Common Law Section, where he teaches Evidence and Criminal Trial Advo
trial and appellate lawyer, Solomon is also a sessional professor at the University of Ottawa Faculty of Law, Common Law Section, where he teaches Evidence and
Criminal Trial Advo
Trial Advocacy.
J. Steven Beckett, director of the
Trial Advocacy Program at the UIUC College of Law and one of the state's foremost experts
in criminal law, was one of the Illinois Innocence Project's early supporters.
You will provide zealous
advocacy and work with your client to try to minimize the impact of the complex legal problems triggered by sexual assault, primarily by obtaining 258E Harassment Prevention Orders and 209A Restraining Orders; and protecting a survivor's private medical, mental health, and education records
in civil privacy hearings during
criminal trials; although we will consider other legal areas if the need arises.
1 For attempts to measure the effect of
advocacy quality through other means, see, e.g., Banks Miller et al., Leveling the Odds: The Effect of Quality Legal Representation in Cases of Asymmetrical Capability, 49 Law & Soc» y Rev. 209 (2015)(finding that high quality representation evened the odds for asylum applicants and that asylum seekers fared better when unrepresented than when represented by a poor lawyer); Mitchell J. Frank & Dr. Osvaldo F. Morera, Professionalism and Advocacy at Trial — Real Jurors Speak in Detail About the Performance of Their Advocates, 64 Baylor L. Rev. 1, 38 (2012)(finding statistically significant correlations in criminal cases between jurors» perceptions of closing argument persuasiveness and jury verdict, and finding statistically significant correlations in civil cases between perceptions of defense counsel's closing argument persuasiveness and defense verdict); James M. Anderson & Paul Heaton, How Much Difference Does the Lawy
advocacy quality through other means, see, e.g., Banks Miller et al., Leveling the Odds: The Effect of Quality Legal Representation
in Cases of Asymmetrical Capability, 49 Law & Soc» y Rev. 209 (2015)(finding that high quality representation evened the odds for asylum applicants and that asylum seekers fared better when unrepresented than when represented by a poor lawyer); Mitchell J. Frank & Dr. Osvaldo F. Morera, Professionalism and
Advocacy at Trial — Real Jurors Speak in Detail About the Performance of Their Advocates, 64 Baylor L. Rev. 1, 38 (2012)(finding statistically significant correlations in criminal cases between jurors» perceptions of closing argument persuasiveness and jury verdict, and finding statistically significant correlations in civil cases between perceptions of defense counsel's closing argument persuasiveness and defense verdict); James M. Anderson & Paul Heaton, How Much Difference Does the Lawy
Advocacy at
Trial — Real Jurors Speak
in Detail About the Performance of Their Advocates, 64 Baylor L. Rev. 1, 38 (2012)(finding statistically significant correlations
in criminal cases between jurors» perceptions of closing argument persuasiveness and jury verdict, and finding statistically significant correlations
in civil cases between perceptions of defense counsel's closing argument persuasiveness and defense verdict); James M. Anderson & Paul Heaton, How Much Difference Does the Lawyer Make?
The persuasive force and eloquent power derived from using visual and aural displays of information
in electronic form, e.g., computer - generated exhibits, at
trial simply can not be ignored,» Moses wrote for the Center for
Criminal Justice
Advocacy.
Advocacy encompasses a range of abilities including case analysis, drafting and using skeleton arguments, making oral submissions, cross-examining witnesses
in criminal trials and being able to put forward a strong and persuasive case.
He has been an instructor
in Trial Advocacy at The University of Calgary, Faculty of Law, and has lectured
in criminal law at the Alberta Bar Admission Course, the Legal Education Society of Alberta and the Canadian Bar Association.
Adjunct Professor of
Trial Skills, teaches courses
in Pre-
Trial Civil Litigation, Pre-
Trial Criminal Litigation and
Trial Advocacy (1988 - present)