Sentences with phrase «in design theory»

Prof. Delagrammatikas joined Cooper Union's Mechanical Engineering Department in September 2005 and has taught courses in design theory, thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, experimentation, internal combustion engines, and automotive engineering.

06:25 PM in Design Theory, Dynamical Meaning, Game Developers, Game Industry, Games, GDC, GDC08, Immersion, Lectures, Meaning, Travel Permalink Comments (3)

10:07 PM in Design Theory, Far Cry 2, Game Developers, Game Industry, Games, GDC, GDC09, Improvisation, Intentionality, Lectures, My Games, Travel Permalink Comments (1)

08:43 PM in Design Theory, Dynamical Meaning, Game Developers, Game Industry, Games, GDC, GDC09, Meaning, Travel Permalink Comments (0)

10:48 PM in Design Theory, Dynamical Meaning, Game Developers, Game Industry, Games, GDC, GDC08, Immersion, Lectures, Meaning, Travel Permalink

Not exact matches

As executive vice-president and chief information officer for Indigo, Serbinis was the point person on Shortcovers, which he now describes as a «pilot» project designed to take the company's theories off whiteboards and out of conference rooms and test them in the marketplace.

In theory, such choices are designed to attract other industries to the province in much the same way that Texas, which has no state income tax, tries to use its oil revenues to convince companies in footloose industries, like electronics, to set up shop in the statIn theory, such choices are designed to attract other industries to the province in much the same way that Texas, which has no state income tax, tries to use its oil revenues to convince companies in footloose industries, like electronics, to set up shop in the statin much the same way that Texas, which has no state income tax, tries to use its oil revenues to convince companies in footloose industries, like electronics, to set up shop in the statin footloose industries, like electronics, to set up shop in the statin the state.

The PhD program at the Rotman School is designed to prepare individuals for academic and research careers by providing in - depth education in current and emerging theory.

The Theory of Evolution is used every day in biology to make predictions and design experiments.

The problem is that he engages in unwanted discussions / debates with coworkers and subordinates... on the job... in «theories» regarding Intelligent Design.

People seem to get upset when someone bring up Intelligent Design or baffled is someone believes in Evolution but like I said, both are just theories.

So it rightly criticises creationism and «intelligent design», yet it rarely challenges the mystifications of deep environmentalist thinking, such as Gaia theory, or the numerous varieties of Eastern mysticism that are so fashionable in Hollywood.

Leonard Susskind in his interview with New Scientist concerning his book, The Cosmic Landscape: String theory and the illusion of intelligent design.

When we are talking about living beings and the world we live in which is so perfectly designed, there is no possible way this is all random and happened by a «big bang theory» which actually requires something to initiate a big bang to begin with.

We know in theory, and more importantly in practice, that randomness filtered through some selective filter generates «sophisticated design» far beyond that which can be hoped for ab initio.

Unfortunately, the minority voice in the communitiy tends to be incredibly vocal and, at times, hostile in the sole attempt to delude the general public into thinking that, if one is a scientist or intelligent, one does not believe in a God or subscribe to intellingent design theories.

Unfortunately, theories of so called Intelligent Design have often played to this prejudice, seeing «design» in terms of special intervention by God to direct the course of this or that particular material feDesign have often played to this prejudice, seeing «design» in terms of special intervention by God to direct the course of this or that particular material fedesign» in terms of special intervention by God to direct the course of this or that particular material feature.

Should intelligent design be presented as a plausible theory in secular classrooms?

But, in simple terms, his theory of spontaneous creation implies an overall more grand design — in that the life instructions could not have been created by life itself, but came from somewhere.

Jones is a regular in the conspiracy - theory arena, calling out instances like Sandy Hook, Stoneman Douglas and Aurora as «false flags» designed to attack the Second Amendment.

Intelligent design is a scientific theory2: A scientific theory is supported by extensive research and repeated experimentation and observation in the natural world.

Except that Intelligent Design is not a scientific theory because it has no evidence in support of its core contention, which is that a god guided or started the process of evolution.

The same applies to its alter ego Intelligent Design — no testable hypotheses, no predictions, just a lot a bogus attempts to poke holes in evolutionary theory, all of which have been soundly refuted.

Creationism and so - called «Intelligent Design» are not in any way scientific theories, and thus when they are presented as such, deserve every bit of the criticism they receive.

Lentricchia, whose earlier work earned him the epithet «the Dirty Harry of literary theory, is the author of Criticism and Social Change (1983), which urges us to regard all literature as «the most devious of rhetorical discourses (writing with political designs upon us all), either in opposition to or in complicity with the power in place.»

The first of these is made up of the evolutionary biologists themselves; the second consists of those who believe that evolution requires a materialist, and hence atheistic, interpretation (evolutionary materialism); the third group comprises the proponents of Intelligent Design Theory (IDT); and the fourth is the evolutionary theists, those who consider Darwinian evolution not only compatible with biblical faith, but an illuminating framework for arriving at a deeper understanding of God than is implied in the notion of a designer.

Fairly typical is this quote from Stephen Meyer's Darwin's Doubt: «Though many biologists now acknowledge serious deficiencies in current strictly materialistic theories of evolution, they resist considering alternatives that involve intelligent guidance, direction, or design.»

In brief: Such websites point to logical and factual flaws in the writings of the Intelligent Design movement and take issue as well with their intellectual honesty — as when, ever eager to write the obituary for Darwinian theory, they fail to acknowledge progress in evolutionary biologIn brief: Such websites point to logical and factual flaws in the writings of the Intelligent Design movement and take issue as well with their intellectual honesty — as when, ever eager to write the obituary for Darwinian theory, they fail to acknowledge progress in evolutionary biologin the writings of the Intelligent Design movement and take issue as well with their intellectual honesty — as when, ever eager to write the obituary for Darwinian theory, they fail to acknowledge progress in evolutionary biologin evolutionary biology.

At first glance, Intelligent Design seems to offer hope: While eschewing the Young Earth theory of creationism, it acknowledges the need, deeply embedded in scientists and theologians alike, to recognize final cause, or telos, in the created universe.

They claim that scientific theories that ascribe the great role to chance and random events in the evolutionary processes should be replaced, or supplemented, by theories acknowledging the thread of intelligent design in the universe.

In pointing out that there are aspects of living organisms for which design is the only rational explanation, ID theory in no sense excludes or precludes the possibility that design was required elsewhere in the organisIn pointing out that there are aspects of living organisms for which design is the only rational explanation, ID theory in no sense excludes or precludes the possibility that design was required elsewhere in the organisin no sense excludes or precludes the possibility that design was required elsewhere in the organisin the organism.

The theory of a transition from a finite intermediary produced by God alone and designed to bring the potentiality of the finite cause into act, to the new increase of being, which would be different from that intermediary yet not actually contained in it, for otherwise of course nothing new would come to be, must inevitably pose exactly the same problem once more.

Proponents of «intelligent design theory» refuse to answer such questions, because it is rhetorically advantageous for them to take a purely negative position in which they criticize Darwinian theory without defending a positive theory of their own.

What's more, since the only designing intelligence that could have played a role in the origin and history of life (including human life) must have been nonhuman, my theory of design detection is irrelevant and misleading for biology.

Stephen Meredith's «Looking for God in All the Wrong Places» in the February 2014 issue of First Things accuses Intelligent Design theory (ID) of being a variant of occasionalism, which he defines as the denial «that efficient causality occurs outside God.»

It is important to clarify, before proceeding, that a theory of «intelligent design» can be parsed in two different ways.

Hence in order to stress this wider environment of human decision and action, I wish to make a case for the development of a theology which, by design, is concerned with the theory and practice of Christian biopolitics.

In science, experiments are designed to (dis) prove that a theory conforms to valid deductive reasoning.

Science And The Magisterium, A New Controversy His Eminence Cardinal Schonborn managed to spark off a media storm recently when he published an article in The New York Times (Finding Design in Creation», 7 July 2005) on the subject of Catholic doctrine and the theory of evolution.

It's kind of telling that the same people who are against gay marriage are also for teaching intelligent design in schools as an accepted scientific theory.

The rest results from the failure to develop a general theory of immanence whereby one actuality could be recognized as being present objectively within the experience of another without thereby destroying its integrity as a distinct individual actuality.6 In contrast to Aristotle's dictum that one substance (i.e., actuality) can not be in another, Whitehead's philosophy is designed to show how this may be sIn contrast to Aristotle's dictum that one substance (i.e., actuality) can not be in another, Whitehead's philosophy is designed to show how this may be sin another, Whitehead's philosophy is designed to show how this may be so.

I am betting you have heard of the Flying Speghetti Monster, did you know the «theory» was conceived as a response to the controversy of teaching Intelligent design in Kansas Public Schools?

Solve for us the question of the reasonableness of athiesm, where you get something (big bang) from nothing — there must be a first cause of everything; explain implications of the anthropic principle and the wildly unprobablistic likelihood that our universe could even form in such a fashion as to be capable of sustaining life (which has, interestingly, your athiest heavy hitters (i.e. Dawkins, Schwartz, etc.) necessarily positing multiple universe theories to get around the near probablistic impossibility of all conditions be present at time of big bang for life to be possible without acknowledgement of a divine designing hand guiding the process); explain The probablistic impossibility of non-irreducibly complex basic cells (life) coming together spontaneously (DNA, cell membrane, etc), even the most basic, simple forms of life allowing for reproduction, metabolism, etc...

We do not hold to an «intelligent design» theory in which God designs each entity separately and extrinsically.

But most forcefully in his statement he asserts that: «Scientific knowledge, the theory of evolution in particular, is consistent with a religious belief in God, whereas the tenets of Creationism and the so - called Intelligent Design are not.

In one important way, Intelligent Design's argument is in a much weaker position than traditional cosmological arguments, for empirical results in biology could show that the mechanisms of neo-Darwinism are sufficient to explain the existence of complex biological forms, and in this case the motivation for Intelligent Design's theory would collapsIn one important way, Intelligent Design's argument is in a much weaker position than traditional cosmological arguments, for empirical results in biology could show that the mechanisms of neo-Darwinism are sufficient to explain the existence of complex biological forms, and in this case the motivation for Intelligent Design's theory would collapsin a much weaker position than traditional cosmological arguments, for empirical results in biology could show that the mechanisms of neo-Darwinism are sufficient to explain the existence of complex biological forms, and in this case the motivation for Intelligent Design's theory would collapsin biology could show that the mechanisms of neo-Darwinism are sufficient to explain the existence of complex biological forms, and in this case the motivation for Intelligent Design's theory would collapsin this case the motivation for Intelligent Design's theory would collapse.

The second is positive: Intelligent Design proposes an alternative theory that purportedly succeeds in explaining what neo-Darwinism can not.

Second, even if Intelligent Design's criticism of neo-Darwinism is warranted, the Intelligent Design theory is not scientific in the strict sense.

«Of course, by design we have to consider the actual car situation in theory, but sometimes it is not always the same situation so that is why we had some issues with the oil tank first.»

Jan 04,2016... In theory, the entire program of the Olympic Games is designed for all the nations of the world.