Cooperman: I still fail to see how atheists are fools for not believing
in a god idea that is completely non-empirical in nature.
Not exact matches
Suddenly, I'm living
in the old folks home, trying to do something like
god knows what, to get something off the ground, not having any
idea what we were doing.»
Those put into question your belief
in the characteristics of the
god, perhaps even the existence of the
god itself, but it is still more comforting to assume something more powerful than yourself has your best interests
in mind vs. the
idea that we are left to our own devices — especially when you are surrounded by people that agree with and reinforce that
idea and shun you when you do not agree with it.
The literal
idea would be something like, «Absolutely spirit
in His essence is
God.»
But spouting the
idea that
god created and designed everything
in an environment such as NASA means that you are intentionally suspending rational thought, and
in this kind of environment that seems, to me at least, unacceptable.
Mr. Hawking wins easy battles against uneducated (
in science) religious persons, but taking his statement on perspective, He is based on assumptions with serious underlying problems, basically everything from mathematics, to the incompatibility of quantum mechanics and relativity, and the lack of proof and evidence for string theories, he is launching a very aggressive statement, probably his last effort on life to counter the anthropomorphic
ideas of
God, and this is very common
in all scientists.
You want your
ideas, your tastes to be celebrated, instead of having a humble, submissive attitude
in order to be part of what
God is doing.
You may RATIONAL
in regards to the [irrational]
ideas of «
God», but that does not prevent you from being IRRATIONAL about other things, including your POLITICAL IDEOLOGY and desires for POWER and wealth.
Seriously, I have the utmost respect for Professor Hawking, he's always been one of my few hero's
in life, but so is MY
idea of
God.
So
god thought it was a good
idea to create the earth mature, and put tons of fossils
in the dirt for kicks?
belief
in god means you do nt look further, scientific theory means you try and disprove yourself to find a better understanding when you have an
idea
Not only does this
idea solve the problem of predestination and free will but is much more
in line with the
idea of
God.
Plenty of others
in their region already had the
ideas of heaven, hell, resuurection after 3 days, sun
gods, etc., etc., etc..
In such works as
Idea of a Christian Society, After Strange
Gods, and Notes Towards the Definition of Culture, he turned away from firmly embedded nails and toward goads.
@brad, you can't destory an
idea, but a building or group of people that have power can be dismantled... islam and christianity and judism are all beliefs... a.k.a. just thoughts of
god,
ideas of an afterlife
in heaven or hell... such things are impossible to kill... sadly
Forget the man
in the robe, (i have no
idea why but as a child i always thought
God had a robe and a turban).
And seeing
God's love reflected
in our life and relationships with others is wonderful — but the way she speaks sounds dangerously close to pantheism, the
idea that
God is some sort of general force of love.
Do you have any
idea how many Doctors, Scientists, Engineers, and many other well educated people believe
in God?
I have no
idea why some believe that
in order for
God to exist, Satan must exist, and vice-versa, but one is not a prerequisite for the other.
I know what the book «Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus» says, but not only was it poorly researched, but the
idea in the title itself, since men and women both originate from
God, is unscriptural.
Although he often expressed this vision obliquely, he was relentless
in his criticism of those who despised faith as an anachronism: «I am not afraid to say that a devout and
God - fearing man is superior as a human specimen to a restless mocker who is glad to style himself an «intellectual,» proud of his cleverness
in using
ideas which he claims as his own though he acquired them
in a pawnshop
in exchange for simplicity of heart....
yo the thing is not about believing or not, is the fact that if we don't believe then we are worthless living garbage who occupy a space
in the universe only to create crap and pollution,
in that kind of case we would better be recycled into some industrial material for a better use than eating and living like cattle, but if there is a
god we acquire a divine status and a purpose to continue to exist beyond afterlife or at least the
idea of it, which would give life a sense right?
Where exactly (to throw a log on the pyre) did mankind arrive at the
idea that a «day» for
God (
in whatever form one chooses) equates to a «day» for thee and me?
But I would love to speak my peace about what I have learned
in my faith with the church — but maybe
God has «cut the strings on that
idea»?
But no matter what the commercialized
idea of Easter is, to Christians it is still regarded as a holy day to remember the salvation
God extends to all who believe
in and accept Him.
Will they be open to the
idea that the
God they have faith
in may not actually exist?
actually the antichrist and satan succeeded
in persuading the people with one
idea, the
idea of (the human
god).
Thanks for making it, reminded me why I started questioning the
idea of
God in the first place.
Anyway, people can get the
idea to look it up themselves if they want to see more names of scientist who believe
in God....
Chris: Darwin was fearful of his big
idea because he still believed
in the existence of the Christian
god, and was extremely uncomfortable coming up with something that went against a literal interpretation of the creation story (I think.
These
ideas are echoed
in the «prosperity gospel» — characterized by the belief that
God wants to bless His people, that He wants to give us tangible rewards such as riches and success and that we claim these rewards by exercising our faith
in obedience.
Since I've now demonstrated that Atheism is NOT a belief
in «no
God» then your entire
idea of Atheism is a «religion» falls apart.
I have a better
idea, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and Benjamin Franklin were not religious people (Deists, believers
in a distant
God).
When I talk to
God in prayer, I am talking to something deep within the fabric of my own being and asking for a better way, a better
idea, and intuitive thought rather than to have some trivial thing of substance delivered to me on a platter.
But when I mean freedom — I mean
in it
in the way «each of us relate to
God» — and I think we have to be open to the
idea this is gonna be a lot different from person to person.
There are plenty of simple
ideas in scripture, and
God is simple
in many ways.
Not only is explicit
in challenging the
idea of the locus of
God's activity being
in Israel and with its people, but it is also very anti-temple.
It's the 0.001 % of them who hold rallies, blow themselves up, and go on television / radio (
in the case of Fox News, start their own network) who HATE the fact that there are those of us out there who do not accept the
idea of
God or Jesus or Allah and think it is unacceptable.
They try to force their religious
ideas on everyone else through legislation, like trying to force children to pray to the Christian
god in school, force the teaching of creationism nonsense
in the schools and denying a woman's right to choose.
These are
in no way original
ideas or thoughts from Calvin, simply the reiteration of the biblical writers expression of the sovereignty of
God.
We all approach the text with an
idea of
God in our minds, even if we don't believe in a g
God in our minds, even if we don't believe
in a
godgod.
The reason is that we are not
gods, and so we can not providentially arrange for people to hold the
ideas and engage
in the behaviors we prefer.
This view may be argued for
in various ways: — first: by appeal to logical laws and metaphysical necessities; — second: by appeal to the existence and nature of
God; — third: by appeal to causal determinism (Causal determinism is the
idea that every event is necessitated by antecedent events and conditions together with the laws of nature)
That biblical vision helped form the bedrock convictions of the American
idea: that government stood under the judgment of divine and natural law; that government was limited
in its reach into human affairs, especially the realm of conscience; that national greatness was measured by fidelity to the moral truths taught by revelation and inscribed
in the world by a demanding yet merciful
God; that only a virtuous people could be truly free.
Perhaps the silence of
God is a necessary step
in our spiritual development, stripping us of our
ideas about
God so that we might enter into a deeper knowing, an experience of
God not as a Being but as Being itself, the ground of all being.
Perhaps
god doesn't like a bunch of mindless sheeple, and lets
in only people who think for themselves and live honest and compassionate lives because they think it's a good
idea, not because they fear eternal punishment.
I have no
idea where it is hidden... You can ask
God about them
in the next life.
I wouldn't call Spenser a greater poet, but he saw the human condition and our often - anguished journey toward
God in a richer, more humane way than Milton did, who at the end of the day was more interested
in ideas than people.
It is the
idea that one doesn't believe
in a
god.
I don't know whether the latter exists but I'm trying to reconcile the
idea of self - described atheists believing
in a
God.