Sentences with phrase «in objects in space»

Two of Jubal Early's cards in Objects in Space, for example, won't strike but will instead force players to take a new flaw card every turn.

Not exact matches

Space junk is dangerous because one collision could trigger a chain reaction of objects hitting each other, resulting in a thick cloud of debris that would make space travel extremely dangeSpace junk is dangerous because one collision could trigger a chain reaction of objects hitting each other, resulting in a thick cloud of debris that would make space travel extremely dangespace travel extremely dangerous.

Devices can superimpose 3D objects in various spaces, giving customers a chance to interact with digital renderings from the comfort of their own homes.

When a small object orbits a big object in space, the less massive one doesn't travel in a perfect circle around the larger one.

Hololens is Microsoft's new augmented reality device that appears to make objects appear in front of you within the physical space you're inhabiting.

A start - up called Desktop Metal has developed 3 - D printers that can produce metal objects safely, in smaller spaces and for a lower cost than traditional manufacturing, which requires expensive machinery, lots of floor space and risky physical labor.

This is an early example of how physical locations and objects can be activated in a digital or gaming space.

Also, there is no substantial law on who can claim what objects or resources in space, beyond the 1967 Outer Space Treaty that declared space open for most kinds of exploitation, so long as «states» clean up their mess, leaving no contamination or dangerous objects that could harm otspace, beyond the 1967 Outer Space Treaty that declared space open for most kinds of exploitation, so long as «states» clean up their mess, leaving no contamination or dangerous objects that could harm otSpace Treaty that declared space open for most kinds of exploitation, so long as «states» clean up their mess, leaving no contamination or dangerous objects that could harm otspace open for most kinds of exploitation, so long as «states» clean up their mess, leaving no contamination or dangerous objects that could harm others.

I feel like meeting someone in meatspace that I've developed a relationship with online would be a lot like having a dream where your mind has placed a really familiar object in a place that it's not supposed to be... like your car on a boat, or your mom in a space suite.

Let's see, hmmm, even if I didn't have to pay for it or the cleaning of it with my tax dollars, I would object to any monument to any religion being placed in a public space that I pay to keep clear for my and others use.

In considering passage Whitehead assumes that a structure of events «provides the framework of the externality of nature within which objects are located» (PNK 80) and that «space and time are abstractions expressive of certain qualities of the structure» (PNK 80).

In relation to the space around it the Earth is weightless.But early man felt that the Earth (a very huge object) must be held up by something.

The brain neutralizes change by transferring it from the time within objects to the space between them, displacing the change that is ingredient in the object to a surface interaction as another property of space.

You have further made a host of assumptions regarding tensors if you wish to limit how physical objects can violate assumed constants in a given time and space.

I do not have to locate my hand in objective space and direct it toward the desired object, nor do I have to identify the hand as my own.

We think not only of objects as self - contained in particular regions of space and related to one another only externally, but we think of human selves that way, too.

And as the Kneales have it, «when «space» and words of similar origin occur in pure mathematics, they refer to abstract patterns of ordering which may conceivably be exemplified by widely differing systems of objects» (DL 386).

29 More perhaps than do «eternal objects,» these «propositions» show how far Whitehead has come with his new solution to the problem of form: he has provided a free space for the unfolding of creativity in world - process.

What appear to us to be solid objects are really made up of molecules and atoms extended in space and time.

What appear to be solid objects are made up of myriads of these energy events, throbbing, dynamic, interrelated and interacting, extended in space and time, with varying degrees of complexity of organization.

Because of God's transcendence it would be mythological to refer to God's action in terms appropriate only to objects available, in principle at least, to ordinary sense perception.13 This especially means that one can not speak of God in terms of the categories of time and space; 14 i.e., whatever is predicated of God can not apply only to some particular time and space, but must apply equally to all times and spaces.15 Thus the implication of Ogden's criterion for non-mythological language about God corresponds to his statement of several years ago, that «there is not the slightest evidence that God has acted in Christ in any way different from the way in which he primordially acts in every other event.

Until the nineteenth century, mathematicians traditionally held that the axioms of geometry, arithmetic, and other disciplines could be established as self - evidently true statements about objects in space.

Temporality exists in the relations among occasions; without temporality, no larger scale events or enduring objects are possible, and in a realistic and relational theory of time and space, the concrescence of microphysical occasions is productive of space - time by providing the relata for the relations which are the fabric of space - time.

In a paper of this brevity, I have to assume that the reader is largely familiar with actual entities and eternal objects, in order to have adequate space for a discussion of nexuIn a paper of this brevity, I have to assume that the reader is largely familiar with actual entities and eternal objects, in order to have adequate space for a discussion of nexuin order to have adequate space for a discussion of nexus.

The objects of sense - experience, and in particular those of visual experience, are often passive and bounded in particular regions of space to the exclusion of other regions.

As objects in one's visual field move through space, for example, one's feeling of them changes.

Triangles, mathematical relations, logical systems, groups, rings, spaces, etc. are all eternal objects or can be viewed as eternal objects through their ordinary expression in mathematical or logical symbolism.

The Protestant bishop of Karachi, for example, has been stopped twice in the past year by Christians who object to his plan to develop commercial space around the outer wall of St. Andrews, the second - largest Protestant church property in Karachi.

Each actual occasion prehends the space - time continuum in its infinite entirety; that, says Whitehead, is nothing but an example of the general principle (also illustrated by prehension of qualitative eternal objects) that «actual fact includes in its own constitution real potentiality which is referent beyond itself.»

Every occasion, as it completes its concrescence, is (1) located in a specific region of the space - time continuum, and (2) is perfectly definite in regard to the inclusion of every eternal object.

The arrows run from the past3 to the present — for the «there» is antecedent, however slightly, in time as well as external in space to the «here» — and from objects to a subject.

Whitehead's cosmology is based on a double foundation: time - space, on the one hand, and what he (in Process and Reality) calls «eternal objects,» on the other.

There are differences, thirdly, as to the nature of the object — whether it is material reality, thought in the mind of God or man, pantheistic spiritual substance, absolute and eternal mystical Being, or simply something which we can not know in itself but upon which we project our ordered thought categories of space, time, and causation.

Our planet home is a giant spaceship, and it is vulnerable to all the objects wandering aimlessly about in space.

suppose atheists want to put an empty space there witha plaque dedicated to nothing in honor of the people who didn't believe in anything... I wouldn't object.

Since «to perceive means to immobilize» (MM 275), space is needed in order to reconstruct and localize objects.

To each observer there corresponds a 3 - or 4 - dimensional perspective or «private space,» in which the sense data literally serve as mathematical points in mapping out the existence and extent of objects that a particular observer seems to perceive.

Thus we experience precisely in freedom what is meant by God, even if we do not name or consider this ineffable, incomprehensible, infinite goal of freedom, which makes possible the distance to the object of our choice, the actual space of freedom.

Similarly, Newton believed that objects can move in space because of the existence of another absolute — time.

Furthermore, he conceived of all space as occupied and considered what we regard as empty space simply as space in which the occasions are not organized into enduring objects.

In taking various profiles, the percipient reaches across space to distinguish events, objects, and relations, while letting them stand as they are in them selveIn taking various profiles, the percipient reaches across space to distinguish events, objects, and relations, while letting them stand as they are in them selvein them selves.

This gives him cognizance of the event by adjective (R 18), for he identifies it and its space - time boundaries by sense - objects situated in it (PNK 67, 84; CN 78, 147).

The units of which the world is made up were thought to be material particles which remained unchanged in themselves as they moved about in space and formed the diverse configurations which made up the physical objects in our world.

The difficulty, which Newton recognizes, is that there may be no physical motion whereby absolute time is accurately measured (PNP 8); and there may be no material object at rest in absolute space in reference to which absolute positions are determined (PNP 8).

Whiteheadian cosmology embraces the notion of a uniform metric structure for the space - time continuum that is independent of the material objects commonly said to be «in» space - time and also that is independent of the material objects appropriated as standards of spatio - temporal measurement.

Now, given any system of material objects that might be considered as a frame of reference in a theory of dynamics, that system is either at rest, or in motion with uniform velocity, or in accelerated motion relative to absolute space.

Any system of material objects in accelerated motion relative to absolute space manifests forces — the «inertial forces» — that vary in accordance with the degree of acceleration; the centrifugal force discussed above is an example.

Neither Newton nor Whitehead ascribes to a purely relative theory of space and time structure, that is, a theory which would maintain that any selected system of material objects may serve as a suitable framework in terms of which to analyze physical reality.

More to the point, Newton's «Scholium» which introduces the notions of «absolute, true, mathematical» space and time, and «relative, apparent, common» space and time (PNP 6 - 12), makes clear that absolute space and absolute time continua are thought to be necessary for a satisfactory theory of dynamics, that is, a theory of the forces which determine • the motion of material objects.7 The main idea in Newton's position is that not all physical frames of reference are suitable for satisfactory analysis of the motion of material objects; in fact, no physical frame of reference is completely suitable for this purpose.

For Newton, absolute space and absolute time are presupposed by a theory of the dynamics of moving bodies and in particular are necessitated by the fact that no available physical frame of reference seems suitable for a satisfactory analysis of the accelerated motions of material objects.