Sentences with phrase «in si»

See how the designer turned one editor's living room into a more beautiful, welcoming space... in half an hour, without bringing in a si...

More detail on the specific analyses is provided in SI Text.

This interaction effect was further probed under the guidelines of Aiken and West (28)(details can be found in SI Text).

If you are invited to participate in the SI, this part of the examination will be administered in an in - person panel interview environment.

5 % increase in SI for each claim - free policy year, subject to a maximum of 20 % of SI.

A chapter by Dr. Sarah Ganz in SI Strong (ed), Arbitration of Trust Disputes, Issues in National and International Law (OUP 2016, forthcoming).

As appears from the transitional provisions in the SI, some of the new rules in Part 36 will apply to the old Part 36 regime where the offer:

(See plots in my SI linked above).

There was no «listing of names» in the paper, the SI, or the link provided in the SI.

One of the reconstructions we put in the SI was a closest station infilling.

See Fig 2 in main paper (link given in an earlier comment) and Tables 1 and 3 in their SI (both non-paywalled).

Just to mention that nick will be along soon to point out that Marie Antoinette was not French and did not own a bucket so you are all wrong as stated in the SI for an edition of the Beano in 1956.

Whatever the ERF F2xCO2 value used in Marvel et al. is, for every forcing agent the ratio of the ERF - based TCR stated in its Figure 1a to the ERF transient efficacy given in its SI Table 1 should equal the GISS - E2 - R TCR of 1.4 °C, and the ratio of the ERF ECS stated in their Figure 1b to the ERF equilibrium efficacy given in their SI Table 1 should equal the GISS - E2 - R ECS of 2.3 °C.

But Marvel et al don't cite Ocko either in the paper itself or in the SI.

Provable in the SI and in comparison of thesis to paper figures.

There is no list of names in the paper, the SI, or the webpage linked in the SI.

Replacing the 123 discarded series were 125 new series all of which were said to have a «positive» relation to temperature (though many were admitted in the SI to have «no low - frequency signal».

That stuff was burried in the SI.

What bugs ME is that he wrote that PNAS paper with all the Tiljander stuff (quotes from the paper and all) in the SI.

However buried in the SI to Mann et al 2009 at Mann's website was the following admission (with a similar caption to their SI Figure S8):

Following on from that, I really disliked how the paper had the sensitivity tests in the SI and the discussion of proxy quality in the SI.

Either they knew they were bad (very unlikely, IMO), or they figured that the problems weren't that severe after all (consistent with what they wrote in the SI).

I don't understand your comment, first you say that he was well aware of the limitations (in SI) and then you say, not.

Basically done now in the SI of Mann09, no?

-- the validation using tree rings but not Tiljander go back to 700AD (EIV method) and 400AD (CPS method)-- if people object to using Tiljander or think they are upside down — the non-Tiljander reconstructions in the SI shows it makes little difference.

Mann: its all in the SI Amac: hey mann website now says 2 +2 = 4 Gavin: The exact value of 2 +2 is uninteresting.

This is nothing more than a re-iteration of the statement in their SI that I had quoted in my Core Tops post:

The exact questions posed to participants and the breakdown of their responses are described in SI Appendix 3.

RTFC and look at the figures and the figures in the SI, which are linked in the comment.

One good strategy to keep things honest is to provide similar figures for all cases in the SI.

Climate data for the PSPs were derived from the programs ClimateWNA v4.62 and ClimatePP v3.21 (44, 45)(details in SI Appendix, Methods).

A total of 1,680 permanent sample plots (PSPs) were used in our study (Fig. 1 and SI Appendix, Table S1), following the data - screening criteria used in previous studies (4, 6) and also detailed in SI Appendix, Methods.

In so doing, A˜mOrt is calculated within the indicated Calculation of the Amplitudes A˜mOrt of the External Forcing section midlatitude belt Δ applying a simplified «strip - by - strip» algorithm of computation of the external forcing, presented in SI sections A. 1, A. 3, and A. 5 of ref.

The effect of these adjustments on the 1994 - 2002 trend is shown in the SI — a shift from 3.5 mm / yr to 3.3 mm / yr.

The proxy data smooths anything going on at less than 300-3000 years (figure S18 in the SI).

He himself has corrected some of his mistakes tucked away in the SI's of subsequent papers.

Methods and results are reported in SI units, but for accessibility to forest and water managers, we reported English units in parentheses within the text and included all study figures and tables in English units as File S1.

He chose not to do so, perhaps unaware that published figures 1G versus 4.3 C provided conclusive «smoking gun» evidence without studying the gory SI data details in the SI Excel spreadsheet.

Doing so would only strengthen Steve M's observation that the 0.75 «conservative» benchmark used in the SI is post hoc shootemup hooey.

This chemistry, detailed in SI Appendix, section 1 and Table S1, was incorporated into the UCI - CIT airshed model (22).

S2 in the SI Appendix) with the independently observed q L that was used in Fig. 4 to motivate the relation between specific humidity and precipitation (Eq.

This offset is discussed together with other possibly relevant processes in the SI Appendix.

Details of the experimental, theoretical, and modeling approaches are found in SI Appendix.

This anomaly may result from the deficiencies in their modern calibration set and the great variability in SI, SD, and epidermal cell density among Betula trees.

The next graphic compares my insta - reconstruction with information provided in the SI to Briffa et al 2013.

S at Earth's orbit averages 1367.6 Watts per square meter, the Earth's albedo is about 0.3 (assume this is exact for the moment), and sigma has the value 5.6704 x 10 ^ -8 in the SI, which gives an emission temperature for Earth of 254.9 K.

Unless you quantify that in SI units of omigawdons, it's just more nonsense from the pro nuclear grandstand crowd.

The provenance of the network used in Mann's November 2009 revision of a figure in his SI isn't described as clearly as it might be.

The additional sub-fossil data used in our new paper further increases the replication of the Yamal chronology compared with the Polar Urals chronology (Figure EC1 in the SI of the new paper).

I can measure both distance, velocity and time in SI units.