Allison Christians, the Stikeman Chair
in Tax Law at McGill University, says there is a «perversity» to the arrangement.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected
in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered
in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases
in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest
in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions
in the industries and markets
in which we operate
in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations
in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain
in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or
at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental
laws, such as U.S. export control
laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery
laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental
laws and agency regulations, both
in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes
in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other thin
tax law, such as the effect of The
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other thin
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction
in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco
in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations
in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign
laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Jonathan Zittrain, a professor
at Harvard
Law School and an expert
in the First Amendment, told the Washington Post that a court could decide that if the public interest was so compelling, then newspapers or the public should try to compel the candidate to authorize the IRS to release his
tax information lawfully.
Adjusted shareholders» equity is shareholders» equity excluding net unrealized investment gains (losses), net of
tax, included
in shareholders» equity, net realized investment gains (losses), net of
tax, for the period presented, the effect of a change
in tax laws and
tax rates
at enactment (excluding the portion related to net unrealized investment gains (losses)-RRB-, preferred stock and discontinued operations.
The outside firm can often cost less than the salary and benefits of a full - time employee and,
at the same time, you may be getting a higher level of advice from a CPA or a
tax accountant, the latter of whom usually is a licensed CPA and a lawyer specializing
in tax law.
Core income (loss) is consolidated net income (loss) excluding the after -
tax impact of net realized investment gains (losses), discontinued operations, the effect of a change
in tax laws and
tax rates
at enactment, and cumulative effect of changes
in accounting principles when applicable.
«The
tax numbers
in corporate filings are mostly fiction,» Alison Christians, a
law professor
at McGill University who specializes
in tax matters, told us.
At least
in the short term, the bank was expected to be the most affected by the new
law, which lowered the corporate
tax rate and introduced measures designed to encourage companies to bring overseas profits back to the US.
Income -
tax - evasion rates in Argentina are roughly 60 percent, and evasion of the value - added tax is roughly 40 percent, according to Marcelo Bergman, a professor at Mexico City's Center for Economic Research and Teaching and the author of Tax Evasion and the Rule of Law in Latin Ameri
tax - evasion rates
in Argentina are roughly 60 percent, and evasion of the value - added
tax is roughly 40 percent, according to Marcelo Bergman, a professor at Mexico City's Center for Economic Research and Teaching and the author of Tax Evasion and the Rule of Law in Latin Ameri
tax is roughly 40 percent, according to Marcelo Bergman, a professor
at Mexico City's Center for Economic Research and Teaching and the author of
Tax Evasion and the Rule of Law in Latin Ameri
Tax Evasion and the Rule of
Law in Latin America.
Apple turned to
tax avoidance experts
at the
law firm Appleby for that advice, according to emails disclosed
in a huge leak of financial documents known as the Paradise Papers, the New York Times and BBC reported on Monday.
«As phenomenal as the generosity the Zuckerbergs are showing is, it comes against the background of the remarkably generous
tax treatment he has gotten for the wealth he has earned,» says Brian Galle, a professor of
law at Georgetown University and a specialist
in tax issues.
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions
in the industries and markets
in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate
in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations
in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand
in construction and
in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges
in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies
in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including
in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended
at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including
in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption
in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes
in political conditions
in the U.S. and other countries
in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes
in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates
in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes
in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personn
tax (including U.S.
tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personn
tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personn
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other
laws and regulations
in the U.S. and other countries
in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result
in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or
at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including
in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted
in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is
in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued
in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
And given what's going on
in Washington, we may be
at these
tax rates and under current
law for a while.
Following is a look
at how blue collar workers
in a number of occupations, from food preparation workers to power plant operators, could see their
taxes change next year if the
tax plan becomes
law.
Inter IKEA Systems B.V., the Dutch company
at the heart of the investigation, said
in a statement: «Inter IKEA Group including its subsidiary Inter IKEA Systems B.V. is committed to paying
taxes in accordance with
laws and regulations wherever we operate.
These AMT exemption amounts, which were expanded under various
tax laws in 2001, 2003 and 2004, expired
at the end of 2005.
The estimates
in the chart show how much single, childless taxpayers
at different income levels who claim the standard deduction might save if the Senate's
tax plan becomes
law:
That makes the treatment of syndicated easements a telling prism through which to view the
tax system
at a moment
in which Congress has been frantically redrafting the
tax laws.
(m) Except as otherwise set forth
in Schedule 2.20 (m) of the Disclosure Schedule, all related party transactions involving the Company are
at arm's length
in compliance with Section 482 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder and any comparable provision of any
Tax law.
Here we take a look
at some of the Trump
tax law changes proposed during his campaign, consider the impact of those changes and the likelihood of these proposals actually becoming
law in 2017.
Below, we will review those two
laws in depth and take a look
at property
tax rates across the state of Oregon.
Since the U.K. eliminated its
tax on income earned outside the country several years ago, it's become increasingly popular for so - called corporate inversions, a controversial practice
in which a foreign company buys a U.K. company, primarily to lower its
tax bill, says Andrew Needham, a
tax partner
at law firm Cravath, Swaine & Moore, which specializes
in private equity and hedge funds.
Joe Bankman, a professor of
tax law at Stanford University, believes that filing
taxes in American can be easier and that there's a better way.
UCLAW alum and now a visiting scholar and senior fellow
in residence
at the Lowell Milken Institute for Business
Law and Policy
at the UCLA School of
Law has a great summary of the likely effect of
tax reform on executive compensation.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied
in any forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to: changes
in consumer discretionary spending; our eCommerce platform not producing the anticipated benefits within the expected time - frame or
at all; the streamlining of the Company's vendor base and execution of the Company's new merchandising strategy not producing the anticipated benefits within the expected time - frame or
at all; the amount that we invest
in strategic transactions and the timing and success of those investments; the integration of strategic acquisitions being more difficult, time - consuming, or costly than expected; inventory turn; changes
in the competitive market and competition amongst retailers; changes
in consumer demand or shopping patterns and our ability to identify new trends and have the right trending products
in our stores and on our website; changes
in existing
tax, labor and other
laws and regulations, including those changing
tax rates and imposing new
taxes and surcharges; limitations on the availability of attractive retail store sites; omni - channel growth; unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential customer information; risks relating to our private brand offerings and new retail concepts; disruptions with our eCommerce platform, including issues caused by high volumes of users or transactions, or our information systems; factors affecting our vendors, including supply chain and currency risks; talent needs and the loss of Edward W. Stack, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; developments with sports leagues, professional athletes or sports superstars; weather - related disruptions and seasonality of our business; and risks associated with being a controlled company.
Check Your Withholding: The government estimates that most taxpayers will see a drop
in their
tax bill when 2019 rolls around, but because the new
law has many twists and turns (especially for those who live
in high property and income
tax states), your best bet is to assume that your
tax liability will be
at least the same as this year.
Under current federal
law, long - term capital gains for individual investors
in the fund are
taxed at a maximum rate of 15 %.
Perhaps if the scheduled 2013
tax changes actually become
law and dividends are again
taxed at a premium to long - term capital gains, investors will become more interested
in companies that repurchase their own shares.
Much of this is overseas, but the aforementioned recent
tax law changes
in the US also includes a one - time
tax break on repatriated cash — this is provoking Amgen to bring
at least some of this money back home.
«This is the kind of
tax reform and
tax cuts that get our economy growing to reach its potential,» House Speaker Paul Ryan said when celebrating the
law's passage
at an event on the White House lawn
in December.
In addition to the lower tax rate mentioned above, the new tax law gives GOOGL the opportunity to repatriate some of its $ 100 + billion in excess cash at a lower 15.5 % rat
In addition to the lower
tax rate mentioned above, the new
tax law gives GOOGL the opportunity to repatriate some of its $ 100 + billion
in excess cash at a lower 15.5 % rat
in excess cash
at a lower 15.5 % rate.
Using the home mortgage interest deduction as a case study, Hemel and Kyle Rozema, a postdoctoral fellow
at the Northwestern - Pritzker School of
Law, argue that labeling a
tax provision as «progressive» or «regressive» should not be done
in isolation.
«U.S. multinational firms are the global grandmasters of
tax avoidance schemes that deplete not just U.S.
tax collection but the
tax collection of most every large economy
in the world,» said Edward D. Kleinbard, a former corporate
tax adviser to such companies who is now a
law professor
at the University of Southern California.
To be safe,
at least for the first year the new
law is
in effect, you may want to assume that your
tax liability will be
at least the same as this year's.
At the same time, American
law dictated that the subsidiaries were only
tax residents
in the United States if incorporated there.
Alternatively, the budget resolution could set revenues
at current
law levels with reconciliation instructions for a nominal change
in revenues to require revenue - neutral
tax reform.
and that is» O.K.» Recently when the young jewish boy was kidnapped and butchered it was revealed that
in that area jews are allowed to have their very own «police force» and that is «O.K.» Every hard working,
law - abiding,
tax - paying legal citizen
in this country needs to take a VERY SERIOUS LOOK
at jews
in the USA and how they manage to to have their own police, ambualnce service, ect.
Again, as it is done
in Nevada (
in certain counties), they «
tax» it, «regulate it», and monitor the workers for diseases, and
at least
in Nevada... apparently, they don't mind much, and the
law says it's o.k..
The Philippines»
Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion (TRAIN) law, which includes a new sugar tax, came into effect at the turn of the year, bringing with it a wave of confusion in the Philippines» drink sect
Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion (TRAIN)
law, which includes a new sugar
tax, came into effect at the turn of the year, bringing with it a wave of confusion in the Philippines» drink sect
tax, came into effect
at the turn of the year, bringing with it a wave of confusion
in the Philippines» drink sector.
The U.S.
tax law that passed
at the end of December included a surprise gift to the wine and spirit industry
in the form of significantly reduced excise
taxes.
Anthony Weiner was an outspoken advocate for — and opponent to — many things while he served
in Congress, but he was the lead sponsor one just one bill that was signed into
law — a 2010 measure aimed
at reducing cigarette sales -
tax evasion.
Over the last several months, Cuomo has been critical of Trump's policies on immigration and the
tax law approved
in December that caps state and local
tax deductions
at $ 10,000 — a move seen as hindering high -
tax states like New York.
Under U.S.
tax law, all accrued capital gains
in property owned
at death are
tax free.
Mrs. Jonathan added, «On May 3, 2017, officials of the FIRS,
in a convoy of about 20 trucks and over 70 personnel, raided our client's NGO — Aridolf Jo Resort Wellness and Spa Limited — situated
at Kpansia Expressway, Bayelsa State, and orchestrated a massive destruction of personal properties belonging to our client without any lawful court order or search warrant and caused mayhem there under the guise of trying to collect unpaid
taxes without following any due process provided by
law to do so.»
Ellner had already done time on federal
tax evasion charges
at that point, lost his
law license and gotten it back again and also rented an apartment
in a house that Levy owned and lived
in during a separation from his wife, Colleen.
A bill introduced Thursday night by Sen. Simcha Felder would change the state's
tax law in order to address the federal
tax overhaul that caps the amount of money taxpayers can deduct
in state and local
taxes at $ 10,000.
Flanagan renewed traditional Republican calls for the budget, including a permanent cap on property
tax increases and a cap on spending increases
at 2 percent enshrined
in state
law.
The final version of the
tax - cap
law, enacted
in tandem with a rent - control extender, said the levy limit «shall remain
in full force and effect
at a minimum until and including June 15, 2016, and shall remain
in effect thereafter only so long as» the rent
laws continue beyond their own expiration, next set for June 2015.
As long as Cuomo's cap stays
in place, it will continue bending the property -
tax curve lower — especially
in school districts, where the
law gives a simple majority of voters the power to absolutely freeze
tax levies
at prior - year levels.
A California Senate leader on Thursday introduced legislation aimed
at circumventing a central plank
in the new Republican
tax law, introducing a model that - if successful - could be replicated all over the country.