Sentences with phrase «in a certain way so»

My biggest takeaway from the experience of breastfeeding in public was that having conventions for the act is putting pressure on moms like me to perform in a certain way so that we're collectively inconspicuous.

«The early - life environment will mark your epigenome in a certain way so that you may develop certain phenotypes or disease states.

Progressive Overload means performing specific bodyweight exercises in certain ways so that you continue to challenge the muscles to adapt and grow.

They recently deployed the ability to let you deploy your own finished EPUB file, but for any other format they sell on their site, they expect you to hand them a Microsoft Word file formatted in a certain way so they can throw it through their own proprietary conversion program and generate all the various formats they can sell.

You can alter your policy in certain ways so you can get certain discounts.

But with Abstract Expressionism, which is in a certain way so spontaneous and impulsive, there's nothing to fuss over really.

Your child counselor will work with your son or daughter to understand why he or she is acting in a certain way so you can all work together toward a solution.

Not exact matches

And so for us, it's still about focusing a certain portion of our budget on just pure brand building: creating that emotional connection, disrupting, and doing things in an interesting way.

Then I had to paint the picture so that the world that had once known me in a certain way could see me in another.

In doing so, the nearly six - year - old company may help address whether certain digital assets are securities and find a way to legally trade those products.

'' [Our team said] «How can we make sure that we can rebrand the channel, but in a way that we can refresh it constantly, so we're not stuck to a certain look and feel that will look old in six months?»»

So many times, leaders get stuck in a certain way of thinking and don't acknowledge a wide variety of different ways to attack an issue.

Soft robots, made of a material that allows them to switch between hard and soft states so as to squeeze through small spaces, have the potential to assist with space explorations, break ground in the way surgeries are performed and complete certain rescue missions.

So it's kind of freeing in a certain way.

is becoming more and more expensive, so in some way there is a sense investing in certain Altcoins.

Bitcoin mining is becoming more and more expensive, so in some way there is a sense investing in certain Altcoins.

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

Demanding that people think a certain way in order to belong is so clean, so black - and - white simple.

Family is definitely a huge part of my life, so I can feel and relate to this in certain ways.

Just because someone who prays to pagan gods in certain way, then decides to pray to the true God through Christ in the same ritual that they were so ingrained from childhood, doesn't mean the person moved back to pagan gods.

Of course even you would be lying if Jesus does not ask us of to behave in a certain way — so if there is a mark — it is something possible.

@ Derrick Yu, This actually may come as a shocker, but there are believers out there who still continue to ask questions about God, about the Universe, and so forth, and unlike certain atheists out there who if they can't get definite answers to just come to conclusions that can not be verified like conclude that there is no God, at least there are believers out there who at least are willing to at least be open to the possibility that there is a God, and from there they develop their faith, which even though is not a perfect knowledge, at least can help keep those minds open, unlike certain atheists who take the easy way out and convincing themselves that it is a fact that there is no God, when in reality it is not a fact at all.

So if people are totally depraved (see the link list below) so that they can not even believe in Jesus for eternal life or respond positively to God in any way, then God must unilaterally give eternal life to certain peoplSo if people are totally depraved (see the link list below) so that they can not even believe in Jesus for eternal life or respond positively to God in any way, then God must unilaterally give eternal life to certain peoplso that they can not even believe in Jesus for eternal life or respond positively to God in any way, then God must unilaterally give eternal life to certain people.

People have the capacity to exercise their muscles but tend to do so in certain ways — for example, to walk upright because that is easier and more efficient than crab - walking.

The target is, rather, those forms of broader modern liberalism which have produced certain ways of thinking about faith and the church which can be found in both conservative and in so - called «liberal» churches.

''... they protest «rigid religion,» objecting to a certain brand of conservatism that insists there is only one way to express spirituality, faith, and the search for transcendence... So why, then, is it «good news» that there is a huge rise in the «spiritual but not religious»?

Nevertheless, certain attitudes so stand in the way that if one holds them he is not likely to get far with his praying.

«That's why the church continues to try to block science from progressing, trying to block certain sciences in schools, and they don't teach all science in private christian schools» = > Public schools are so anti God it is pathetic you are way off on that one.

The interest may be to convey to students a certain range of information, or to cultivate in students certain capacities for research, or to «form» students in certain ways, or to advance the instructor's research agenda, and so forth.

Once the shock wore off though, I realized that money abuses and issues, while endemic within churches, still only account for a portion of the many ways in which churches have wounded people and thus there is undoubtedly plenty of people in search of a safe place who do not have any of the same issues that I have with linking money and spirituality, so really you were only excluding a certain portion of people from safety by attaching a price tag to it, those for whom money issues are a sticking point and of course those who simply don't have the extra funds to commit.

In challenging process theology to state explicitly that God sides with the oppressed, and to do so in a way that does not rule out the possibility of righteous counterviolence, I understand Jones to be challenging process theology to explicate the social - ethical consequences of accepting certain metaphysical truths in order that black theology might measure its ethical content against the needs of the struggle for liberatioIn challenging process theology to state explicitly that God sides with the oppressed, and to do so in a way that does not rule out the possibility of righteous counterviolence, I understand Jones to be challenging process theology to explicate the social - ethical consequences of accepting certain metaphysical truths in order that black theology might measure its ethical content against the needs of the struggle for liberatioin a way that does not rule out the possibility of righteous counterviolence, I understand Jones to be challenging process theology to explicate the social - ethical consequences of accepting certain metaphysical truths in order that black theology might measure its ethical content against the needs of the struggle for liberatioin order that black theology might measure its ethical content against the needs of the struggle for liberation.

Most people who don't believe do so because God, and / or religion asks something of them... that is... to live in a certain way....

In particular, the denial that epistemology is wholly prior to ontology; the denial that we can have an absolutely certain starting point; the idea that those elements of experience thought by most people to be primitive givens are in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all of our descriptions of our observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus of our conscious attention, are conditioned by our purposes; the idea that the so - called scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most of our ideas do not correspond to things beyond ourselves in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itselfIn particular, the denial that epistemology is wholly prior to ontology; the denial that we can have an absolutely certain starting point; the idea that those elements of experience thought by most people to be primitive givens are in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all of our descriptions of our observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus of our conscious attention, are conditioned by our purposes; the idea that the so - called scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most of our ideas do not correspond to things beyond ourselves in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itselfin fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all of our descriptions of our observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus of our conscious attention, are conditioned by our purposes; the idea that the so - called scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most of our ideas do not correspond to things beyond ourselves in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itselfin any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itselfin the «red brick» itself).

So, too, does faith consist of certain basic assumptions: assumptions about meaning and value, certain attitudes about the proper way to relate to people and to the world, and certain presuppositions about what is most important and most valuable in life.

The revealed account of creation mentions only the «dust of the earth» as material cause; there is no certain scientific doctrine to the contrary; therefore there is no reason to abandon a «literal» interpretation of Genesis, all the more so as the history of the theory of evolution shows that this tends to be regarded in a radically materialistic way as a complete explanation of man's origin, and so involves theses which are certainly heretical.

But here we may reasonably suspect a certain amount of embroidery, the more so since Matthew has also an edifying story about the traitor's remorse and grisly end — a story, by the way, inconsistent with another account of his death which is found in the Acts of the Apostles, not to mention a third divergent account which we know to have been handed down traditionally in the early church.

But on the other hand, when in talking about sin one talks only of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such things up to a certain point, and yet the whole life may be sin, the well - known kind of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware in what an infinitely deeper sense a human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and thought, with respect to quickness in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint of God as to what His will is for this self.

But it must shine in a certain way, so that when men see your goodness they do not remark how good a person you are, but how great God is.

Essential to this is the idea of magisterium, seen as the fulfilment of the promise of Christ «I will be with you always» so that in the Church, the Word «certain in all His ways» is ever present.

I so which certain churches and pastors wouldn't put these roadblocks and speed bumps in people's way of approaching God.

There are a variety of ways in which this is so, but, at the same time, it's clear that certain aspects of pagan familial virtue are not exactly incompatible with the Biblical sacred order that can check or overcome their excesses and pathologies — just as the Biblical order imposes powerful interdicts, not to be confused with taboos, against the kind of violent desires that, to the morbid fascination of the ancient Greeks, deconstructed and destroyed the identities of family - bound individuals.

Assuming we are indeed stuck with virtue in a certain way, so too may we well also be stuck with a certain type of «noble values»...

So, this means that there is ONE valid interpretation to any text, unless the author purposely designed the text in such a way as to make people ponder various interpretations (which would be a certain kind of genre, but not most texts).

I think the answer is in general that God made the world so that if you live in certain ways then generally speaking your life goes better.

We have been taught by books, pastors, seminaries, and Christian friends for so long to read the Bible a certain way and look for certain truths in Scripture, that when someone comes along and says, «Yeah, but did you notice the gorilla in the text?»

A similar judgment is tendered by William Seager, who points out that if the psychological is supervenient upon the physical, it is so in a way that is crucially different from the way in which liquidity is supervenient upon certain molecular states, because we have no idea as to why the joint activity of insentient neurons should give rise to consciousness (MC 179).

Why would you even begin to think that» I» would so over-generalize in such a way that to (quote you):» Linking the hate of certain violent groups with «all» muslims or immigrants everywhere is wrong.»

An Emergent definition of relevance, modulated by resistance, might run something like this; relevance means listening before speaking; relevance means interpreting the culture to itself by noting the ways in which certain cultural productions gesture toward a transcendent grace and beauty; relevance means being ready to give an account for the hope that we have and being in places where someone might actually ask; relevance means believing that we might learn something from those who are most unlike us; relevance means not so much translating the churches language to the culture as translating the culture's language back to the church; relevance means making theological sense of the depth that people discover in the oddest places of ordinary living and then using that experience to draw them to the source of that depth (Augustine seems to imply such a move in his reflections on beauty and transience in his Confessions).

Speaking during Premier's News Hour, she said: «We have whole issues with purity culture and modesty culture which says, «well, women, if you dress a certain way it's your fault if a man behaves in that way» and so actually for a lot of women they have been conditioned to blame themselves and say «if he's done that to me it must be my fault».

So, too, events, in which we may find revealed to us something or someone in whom we are impelled to put our trust, are revelatory only in so far as we react to them in certain special waySo, too, events, in which we may find revealed to us something or someone in whom we are impelled to put our trust, are revelatory only in so far as we react to them in certain special wayso far as we react to them in certain special ways.