Put differently, the appellants» arguments fail to recognize that
in a constitutional democracy such as ours, protection from legislation that some might view as unjust or unfair properly lies not in the amorphous underlying principles of our Constitution, but in its text and the ballot box (par.
Not exact matches
In the light of last night's vote in the House of Commons on whether or not to hold a referendum to ratify the Lisbon Treaty, Unlock Democracy is calling on Parliament to decide new rules over whether legislation has constitutional implications or not and how such decisions should be decide
In the light of last night's vote
in the House of Commons on whether or not to hold a referendum to ratify the Lisbon Treaty, Unlock Democracy is calling on Parliament to decide new rules over whether legislation has constitutional implications or not and how such decisions should be decide
in the House of Commons on whether or not to hold a referendum to ratify the Lisbon Treaty, Unlock
Democracy is calling on Parliament to decide new rules over whether legislation has
constitutional implications or not and how
such decisions should be decided.
Allowing a pariah and disgraced leader
such as Mugabe asylum
in our country would be an affront to the values and principles upon which our
constitutional democracy is based,» Cope leader Mosiuoa Lekota, said.
For justice
in the courts, it implies that a
constitutional democracy is not necessary to deal with
such problems as unconscionable delay.