Sentences with phrase «in a joint legal»

Parents interested in a joint legal custody arrangement should first consider the level of communication between themselves and the child's other parent.

If one parent in a joint legal custody arrangement takes decision - making powers away from the other parent (perhaps by making unilateral decisions about a child's education), the other parent can go back to court to get a judge to enforce the joint legal custody order.

In sole legal custody one parent has sole legal authority to make major decisions for the child regarding education, religion, and health care; in joint legal custody both parents have the legal authority to make major decisions for the child.

In joint legal custody arrangements, a move will not affect decision - making authority; thus, both parents must still participate in making decisions about the child.

Parents who agree to share joint legal custody of a child often outline their shared responsibilities in a joint legal custody agreement.

Joint Legal Custody - In joint legal custody arrangements, parents share responsibility for making major decisions about the child's welfare.

In joint legal custody arrangements, parents share equally in decisions regarding the child's health, religion, education and other important areas.

In joint legal custody arrangements, parents share equally in decision - making responsibility for a child but may not necessarily spend equal amounts of time with them.

In a joint legal custody situation, neither parent can override the other.

Some provisions in joint legal custody laws require a minimum visitation period for the noncustodial parent that can be limited only when there is a threat of physical harm to the child.

In joint legal custody arrangements, noncustodial parents may be more likely to pay child support than parents who do not have joint legal custody of their children.

In 1986, the majority of orders gave so - called «traditional» custody to mothers, and only 1 % of orders resulted in joint legal custody.

In joint legal custody cases, Arizona family law requires a written parenting plan that must be reviewed periodically and provides a way to resolve conflicts about custody and parenting time.

In joint legal custody, 7 % of the children living with their mothers and 20 % of the children living with their fathers reported no overnights with the other parent.

In a joint legal custody arrangement, parents share the responsibilities of making decisions focused on raising the child and other important decisions like education and health care.

In joint legal custody arrangements, the parent who is the primary physical custodian may relocate with the child but must file a move - away petition with the court.

... conflict between divorcing parents in our sample did not appear to worsen as a result of the increased demand for interparental cooperation and communication in joint legal or joint residential custody arrangements.

I read this as «the children who were in joint legal and joint physical custody (no difference) got along better with and spent more time with their fathers.

Not exact matches

While a number of institutions offer joint law and management degrees, this year Odette launched an MBA / Dual JD degree, which allows students to earn legal qualifications in both Canada (with Windsor) and the U.S. (with University of Detroit - Mercy).

Local miner Pilbara Minerals is threatening legal action against its former joint venture partner after discovering problems with the plant at its Tabba Tabba tantalite project, which was completed in November.

Carlo Ferro is Executive Vice President, Finance, Legal, Infrastructure and Services, and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of STMicroelectronics and has held the CFO position since May 2003, with temporary suspension during his tenure at ST - Ericsson, where he first served as Chief Operating Officer (February 2012 — March 2013) and then was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer in April 2013 to lead the re-organization to split up the joint - venture business and resources to the two shareholders and wind down the JV.

Windsor also has a joint MBA / JD degree program where students can combine legal and business management skills, graduating with both degrees in just four years.

On Tuesday, a joint release from New Frontier and ArcView projected that California's legal marijuana market could reach $ 7.6 billion in annual sales by 2020 alone.

The statement goes on to label the public vilification it has faced since a joint Guardian and Channel 4 exposé in March as based on «unfounded accusations,» claiming their activities are not only legal but also «widely accepted as a standard component of online advertising.»

Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, increased competition; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the Company's ability to differentiate its products from other brands; the consolidation of retail customers; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market share, or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's inability to realize the anticipated benefits from the Company's cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; changes in laws and regulations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; failure to successfully integrate the Company; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the nations in which the Company operates; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives that the Company uses; exchange rate fluctuations; disruptions in information technology networks and systems; the Company's inability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts of natural events in the locations in which the Company or its customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; the Company's dividend payments on its Series A Preferred Stock; tax law changes or interpretations; pricing actions; and other factors.

Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, operating in a highly competitive industry; changes in the retail landscape or the loss of key retail customers; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the impacts of the Company's international operations; the Company's ability to leverage its brand value; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market share, or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's ability to realize the anticipated benefits from its cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; the execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; tax law changes or interpretations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the United States and in various other nations in which we operate; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives we use; exchange rate fluctuations; risks associated with information technology and systems, including service interruptions, misappropriation of data or breaches of security; the Company's ability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts of natural events in the locations in which we or the Company's customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; the Company's ownership structure; the impact of future sales of its common stock in the public markets; the Company's ability to continue to pay a regular dividend; changes in laws and regulations; restatements of the Company's consolidated financial statements; and other factors.

Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, increased competition; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the Company's ability to differentiate its products from other brands; the consolidation of retail customers; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market share or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's inability to realize the anticipated benefits from the Company's cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; changes in laws and regulations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; failure to successfully integrate the business and operations of the Company in the expected time frame; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the nations in which the Company operates; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives that the Company uses; exchange rate fluctuations; risks associated with information technology and systems, including service interruptions, misappropriation of data or breaches of security; the Company's inability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts of natural events in the locations in which the Company or its customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; tax law changes or interpretations; and other factors.

If one of the partners is not located in the United States, or if both parties are foreign, additional documents will need to be signed: specifically, a New Legal Entity and a Joint Venture Agreement.

In the joint press conference, Zhao was asked whether the company's «ongoing legal dispute» with Sequoia Capital could cause Binance to delay their promised contributions to the Bermudan economy.

Forty - five leading pro-life advocates, including Gary Bauer of the Family Research Council, James Dobson of Focus on the Family, Clarke Forsythe of Americans United for Life, Wanda Franz of the National Right to Life Committee, and Ralph Reed of the Christian Coalition, signed a much heralded joint «Statement of Pro-Life Principle and Concern» published in First Things in 1996 in which the primary legal complaint was made that Roe «wounded American democracy» by removing the issue of abortion from «democratic concern.»

IF you're going to redefine «marriage» for the purpose of visiting someone in the hospital, obtaining equal access to health benefits, filing joint returns, then look at the entire legal definition.

The Food Industry Research and Development Institute (FIRDI) is a non-profit legal entity established in 1965 with financial support from the Canners» Association of Taiwan, CIECD (Council for International Economic Cooperation and Development) and JCRR (Joint Commission on Rural Reconstruction).

When parents share joint legal custody, they both have a say in major decisions regarding the child's life, such as education, religious upbringing, and medical care.

If an Alabama court determines that domestic violence has occurred, the court will presume that it is not in the best interests of the child to be placed in the sole custody or joint legal or physical custody of the person accused of domestic or family violence.

Now I am in a legal battle with his family just to have 50 % of the sale of our joint property, which I've paid into with steady work, for 10 yrs.

Family courts in Illinois prefer to award parents joint legal custody, noting that joint physical custody should be determined by the parents» agreement or the court's order.

An Idaho court might award joint physical custody, joint legal custody or both based on what the court believes is in the best interests of the child.

In other words, parents who share joint custody may only share joint legal custody, meaning that they equally share the responsibility for making major legal decisions on behalf of the child.

In the case of joint legal custody, this becomes even more important.

Full custody differs from joint custody in that a full custody arrangement grants legal and physical custody to one parent as opposed to both parents.

The court may award either «sole legal custody» or «joint physical custody» if it is in the best interest of the child.

A court in Utah will always consider joint physical or legal custody if both parties have completed a parenting plan and if joint custody serves the best interests of the child.

Joint custody reposes in both parents legal responsibility for the care of their children and alternates the physical custody.

When the legal resolution to these battles is joint physical custody the battles often don't end in the courtroom.

In child custody situations, «joint custody» usually refers to one of two possible scenarios: joint legal and physical custody, or joint legal custody.

New Hampshire: Joint legal custody is presumed to be in the best interests of the child, unless the child has been abused by one of the parents.

If both parents have joint legal custody, then intentionally excluding the other parent in the decision - making process may be considered contempt of court.

Keep in mind; most states prefer awarding joint legal custody based on the best interests of the child.

Instead, the courts fail to determine that either adult is the better parent and decide to rule in favor of joint custody, which can be joint legal custody or joint physical custody.

This is called «joint legal custody» in most states.