Sentences with phrase «in a moral sense when»

You have exposed my original point quite nicely with your well - intentioned concern for the business, and my point is this... We have ALL been co-opted by the sales process from the top down, from seventy - five years ago to today, without giving much real thought to just what is going down in a moral sense when the vast majority of us go into this business with thoughts of grandeur, money, fame, more money etc., etc..

Not exact matches

What, in a moral sense, do we convey when we refer to people as «selves»?

Jeremy thanks for your comments alot of this i never really thought about before until you provoked me to seek the truth in the word it is what we all should be doing finding the truth for ourselves God wants to reveal mysterys if we are open to hear.If we have been christians awhile we just take the word of whoevers preaching or whichever clip we see on god tube its knowledge but not revelation.Because the story sounds plausible we tag that on to our belief for example for many years i believed that the rich young rulers problem was money so the way to deal with that problem is to give it away and be a follower of Jesus sounds plausible.Till you realise every believers situation is different so the message has to be universal.So the reason its not about money because it excludes those that do nt have it and does nt make room for those that do have it but do nt worship it.The rich young ruler was not a bad person he lived by a good moral code but he made money his idol he put that before God.The word says we shall not have any idols thats a sin and a wicked one.In fact there wasnt any room in his heart for Jesus that is a tragedy.So when we see the message is about Idolatry we all have areas that we chose not to submit to God thats universal everyone of us whether we are rich or poor.I believe we are unaware that we have these idols what are some of them that was revealed to me our partners our children our work our church our family i can sense some of you are getting fidgetty.

But our language is being debased in the most profound sense when it loses the ability to discern and describe the lineaments of our moral lives.

When considered in light of the substantive moral basis of democratic governance, Roe v. Wade and similar decisions stand out as «undemocratic» in a far more radical sense than the one Justice Scalia has in mind.

Rather, we are referring here to our moral or ethical sense: our ability to recognize right and wrong, justice and injustice, even when inequity is socially acceptable and injustice is inherent in the existing structures.

In fact, if ethical disputes only make sense when morals are objective, then relativism can only be consistently lived out in silencIn fact, if ethical disputes only make sense when morals are objective, then relativism can only be consistently lived out in silencin silence.

The lesson I draw from this is that to profess moral truths, even when they are not only universally valid but even, in some sense, universally known, can not be a theologically neutral act.

When practicing the Law of Love, we are pretty much «flying by the seat of our pants,» relying on common sense and intuition rather than a moral manual or theological dogmas to keep us from making errors in judgment.

Turning first to the relation of faith and justice, I wish to argue that even when «justice» is understood not merely in a generally moral but in a specifically political sense, the demand for justice is a demand of faith itself.

In that sense, NFP marks a «moral minimum», a way of avoiding children without sin - when there are serious reasons to do so.

What we don't know is exactly when the uniquely human capacity for empathy and justice emerged in our ancestors and how cultures build on a universal moral sense.

These include obsessive focus on food choice, planning, purchase, preparation, and consumption; food regarded primarily as source of health rather than pleasure; distress or disgust when in proximity to prohibited foods; exaggerated faith that inclusion or elimination of particular kinds of food can prevent or cure disease or affect daily well - being; periodic shifts in dietary beliefs while other processes persist unchanged; moral judgment of others based on dietary choices; body image distortion around sense of physical «impurity» rather than weight; persistent belief that dietary practices are health - promoting despite evidence of malnutrition.

When I stumbled over the Keto diet, I read the theory and it just made sense BUT it was not in keeping with my morals, I have found a few vegan keto diet bloggers (yeah!!!)

(Hotels in Peru don't pay sales taxes when locals do) The tourism handled incorrectly, without respect to locals, without ethics, moral or respect to the rules of the Park, without care and respect of the environment is dishonest in all sense, in the other hand many companies do not pay taxes in Peru and this is reflected in their low prices and a poor improvised service without experience neither quality exploiting porters, cooks and inexperienced students guides.

When it comes to absolute moral values, Etzioni explains, it is the imperative quality that rules — the moral sense that the person «must» behave in the prescribed way, that one is obligated, duty bound.

So when you say «prostitution is legal», this carries no moral judgement in the sense that prostitution is moral or immoral.