Not exact matches
I, being of lawful age,
in consideration of being permitted to utilize the above - described race track facilities and / or participate
in and / or observe TVBWFA Barrel Races and / or events release and forever discharge Releases, their heirs, administrators, and executors of and from any and every claim, demand,
action, of whatsoever kind or nature, either
in law or
in equity arising from or by reason of any bodily
injury or
personal injuries known or unknown, death, and / or property damage
which may occur as a result of my utilization of the above described race track facilities and / or any participation
in and / or observation of TVBWFA Barrel Races and / or events or any activity
in connection therewith, whether by negligence or not.
By submitting an Entry, each Participant (whether declared a Winner or not) agrees (and agrees to affirm such
in writing) to (i) abide by and be bound by these Official Rules and the decisions of DeliciousBaby on all matters relating to this Giveaway
which decisions are final and binding
in all respects, (ii) waive any right to claim ambiguity
in the Giveaway or these Official Rules, (iii) forever and irrevocably release, discharge, indemnify and hold harmless the Giveaway Entities, and each of their respective officers, directors, licensors, employees, representatives and agents (collectively, the «Released Parties») from any liability, claims, demands, and cause of
action from
personal injury, loss or damage, including death, or property damage, theft, or loss suffered or resulting
in whole or
in part, directly or indirectly, from participation
in this Giveaway or the use, misuse or acceptance or possession of the Prize or any portion thereof, or participation
in any Giveaway - related activity; (iv) grant DeliciousBaby (where permitted by law) the right to use their name on a worldwide basis,
in all forms of media,
in perpetuity without review or further compensation and, (v) warrant and represent that the use of the materials submitted
in this Giveaway will not violate the rights of any third parties.
Some of the contacts he made
in that role paid off for him after he left the Assembly: the
personal injury and class -
action «mass tort» law firm Moretti Ratner (partners of
which contributed $ 10,000 to his campaign) hired Lancman at some point
in the last year, it appears.
But they are also largely of their times: Sex, Lies, and Videotape existed
in a world
in which people still used videotapes, while Erin Brockovich came out amidst the renaissance of class
action and
personal injury lawsuits.
While spiritual creatures from other realms are not a covered peril for
personal property, we expect that if a poltergeist somehow forced you to take a specific
action which resulted
in bodily
injury or property damage to another person, you could well have coverage under the liability section of your Erie, PA renters insurance policy.
I, the parent or legal guardian of the youth named above, being of lawful age, knowingly and voluntarily state and agree as follows:
In consideration of the opportunity for the youth named above's participation being accepted and intending to be legally bound, I do hereby for myself, on behalf of my children, and for my heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, release, waive and forever discharge the Santa Barbara Sailing Center employees from any and all claims actions, damages, costs, judgments or liability whatsoever, which I or my children now have or which may hereafter accrue to me or my children on account of or in any way growing out of any and all known and unknown, foreseen and unforeseen, bodily and personal injuries, property damage and the consequences thereof resulting from or to result from participation in The Santa Barbara Sailing Center's Summer Kids Cam
In consideration of the opportunity for the youth named above's participation being accepted and intending to be legally bound, I do hereby for myself, on behalf of my children, and for my heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, release, waive and forever discharge the Santa Barbara Sailing Center employees from any and all claims
actions, damages, costs, judgments or liability whatsoever,
which I or my children now have or
which may hereafter accrue to me or my children on account of or
in any way growing out of any and all known and unknown, foreseen and unforeseen, bodily and personal injuries, property damage and the consequences thereof resulting from or to result from participation in The Santa Barbara Sailing Center's Summer Kids Cam
in any way growing out of any and all known and unknown, foreseen and unforeseen, bodily and
personal injuries, property damage and the consequences thereof resulting from or to result from participation
in The Santa Barbara Sailing Center's Summer Kids Cam
in The Santa Barbara Sailing Center's Summer Kids Camp.
Personal injury cases result from incidents of negligence,
in which someone has, through their negligent and / or reckless
actions, caused another to suffer an
injury.
Reasons for judgement were released recently by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, demonstrating that having a Plaintiff's claim dismissed for failing to discharge obligations under the BC Supreme Court Rules is a «draconian remedy «
which will not lightly be granted
in a
personal injury action where liability is admitted.
The group,
which also includes professionals
in the firm's Washington, Chicago and Phoenix offices, has handled litigation
in more than 30 states
in cases ranging from putative nationwide class
actions and mass
actions for
personal injury and property damage to complex environmental investigation and / or remediation issues and matters involving multiple defendants and hundreds of products.
At the time I came on board
in 2008, Slater and Gordon more or less had only two practice areas,
which were
personal injury and specialized class
action law suits.
A Loudoun County
personal injury lawyer will be experienced
in a variety of serious or severe
injury liability cases and will be able to properly assess the chain of events or
actions which caused the accident,
which helps to accurately ascribe the degree of liability regarding the various individuals and entities involved.
Some
personal injury actions revolve around legal causation derived from a concept of intentional conduct, whereby it is generally held that if one intentionally harms another, or knows that the conduct
which is engaged
in causes a substantial likelihood that harm will result, liability for the resulting harm will
in fact attach.
Lots of Depuy hip replacements claims filed by individual victims of these complications actually form part of larger class
action lawsuits against the manufacturers Depuy and
in which the
personal injury lawyers who work for Ketchmark and McCreight, P.C. have years of experience to draw on.
In a personal injury case in Colorado, the burden of proof that a plaintiff carries to prove causation is proof by preponderance of the evidence, which essentially means that the plaintiff must prove that it is more likely than not that their injuries were caused by the actions of the defendan
In a
personal injury case
in Colorado, the burden of proof that a plaintiff carries to prove causation is proof by preponderance of the evidence, which essentially means that the plaintiff must prove that it is more likely than not that their injuries were caused by the actions of the defendan
in Colorado, the burden of proof that a plaintiff carries to prove causation is proof by preponderance of the evidence,
which essentially means that the plaintiff must prove that it is more likely than not that their
injuries were caused by the
actions of the defendant.
Washington State allows you three years
in which to take
action through a
personal injury lawsuit.
Defended a market - leading insurer
in a Massachusetts direct
action in which the injured plaintiffs sought more than $ 40 million
in punitive damages against our client (primary insurer on business auto policy) for its alleged failure to promptly settle a catastrophic
personal injury claim.
Typically, the limitation period within
which a legal
action must be commenced
in personal injury lawsuits is two years from the date of the accident, but for infants, the limitation period is postponed until two years after the infant attains the age of majority (19 years of age).
They relied on the Law Commission's report Limitation of
Actions (Law Com No 270)
which recommended a uniform regime for
personal injuries, whether the claim was made
in negligence or trespass to the person.
There are many different scenarios
in which personal injuries may occur — many of
which are the direct result of another person's negligence or irresponsible
actions.
This is potentially a very significant issue
in an
action for
personal injuries involving a bicyclist and a motor vehicle
which occurred at night.
Accident victims
in Florida are protected by our state
personal injury laws,
which are designed to hold those responsible for harmful their
actions.
§ 1983 complaint
Actions under § 1983 are
personal injury claims and are governed by the
personal injury statute of limitations
in the state
in which the alleged
injury occurred.
Mark counts among his many successes his role as co-counsel
in a complex products liability
action,
which resulted
in the largest
personal injury award
in the State of Delaware at the time of its completion, $ 17.5 Million against a number of national defendants.
735 ILCS 5/13-213 (d): Alternate limitation period Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (b) and (c), if the
injury complained of occurs within any of the periods provided by subsections (b) and (c), the plaintiff may bring suit within 2 years after the date on
which the claimant knew, or through the use of reasonable diligence should have known, of the existence of the
personal injury, death, or property damage; but
in no event may such an
action be brought more than 8 years after the date on
which the
personal injury, death, or property damage occurred.
Representation of a major international insurer
in a Massachusetts statutory bad faith
action in which the injured plaintiffs sought more than $ 40 million
in compensatory and punitive damages against our client (primary insurer on business auto policy) for its alleged failure to promptly settle a catastrophic
personal injury claim.
There are many different scenarios
in which personal injury may occur — many of
which are the direct result of another person's negligence or irresponsible
actions.
In an illustration of its travel - related personal injury expertise, Arion Jones is acting for the Freedom Travel Group in a multi-party action brought by seven claimants who suffered gastric illness, which involves complex issues of medical causation and quantum and a dispute between two defendant
In an illustration of its travel - related
personal injury expertise, Arion Jones is acting for the Freedom Travel Group
in a multi-party action brought by seven claimants who suffered gastric illness, which involves complex issues of medical causation and quantum and a dispute between two defendant
in a multi-party
action brought by seven claimants who suffered gastric illness,
which involves complex issues of medical causation and quantum and a dispute between two defendants.
For
personal injury lawsuits, you must be able to prove the party was negligent
in their
actions,
which resulted
in an
injury.
Product liability
actions seeking to recover damages for motorcyclists»
personal injuries or death are usually brought as strict liability claims,
which enable a plaintiff to establish the liability of certain defendants without the necessity of proving that any of the defendants was negligent
in creating the defective vehicle that caused the motorcyclist's
injury or death or
in releasing it to the market.
This includes general non-pecuniary damages for pain and suffering
in personal injury actions,
which are presumed to arise the moment the
injury occurs.
If there is a
personal injury action to be issued
which took place
in Markham, it would need to be issued at the Superior Court of Justice
in Newmarket on Eagle Street, or elsewhere
in Ontario.
Section 127 of the Courts of Justice Act defines «the prejudgment interest rate» as «the bank rate at the end of the first day of the last month of the quarter preceding the quarter
in which the proceeding was commenced».11 Nevertheless, the court examined s. 128 (1) and (2) of the Courts of Justice Act and described that prejudgment interest has two default rules: one for non-pecuniary loss
in personal injury actions, and another for all other awards where prejudgment interest is available.
Hayward represents an important clarification of the circumstances
in which the cause of
action in deceit will lie, and it is obvious that that tort is, today, being invoked with some regularity
in response to fraudulent
personal injury claims (see, eg, Direct Line Group Plc v Akramzadeh (High Court, unreported, 15 June 2016)
in which an insurer sued
in deceit 29 persons who had fraudulently made claims arising out of motor vehicle accidents).
So Parliament passed the Law Reform (
Personal Injuries) Act 1948 which provided that: «In any action for damages for personal injuries there shall be disregarded in determining the reasonableness of any expenses, the possibility of avoiding those expenses, or part of them by taking advantage of facilities available under the National Health Service Acts
Personal Injuries) Act 1948 which provided that: «In any action for damages for personal injuries there shall be disregarded in determining the reasonableness of any expenses, the possibility of avoiding those expenses, or part of them by taking advantage of facilities available under the National Health Service Acts
Injuries) Act 1948
which provided that: «
In any action for damages for personal injuries there shall be disregarded in determining the reasonableness of any expenses, the possibility of avoiding those expenses, or part of them by taking advantage of facilities available under the National Health Service Acts.&raqu
In any
action for damages for
personal injuries there shall be disregarded in determining the reasonableness of any expenses, the possibility of avoiding those expenses, or part of them by taking advantage of facilities available under the National Health Service Acts
personal injuries there shall be disregarded in determining the reasonableness of any expenses, the possibility of avoiding those expenses, or part of them by taking advantage of facilities available under the National Health Service Acts
injuries there shall be disregarded
in determining the reasonableness of any expenses, the possibility of avoiding those expenses, or part of them by taking advantage of facilities available under the National Health Service Acts.&raqu
in determining the reasonableness of any expenses, the possibility of avoiding those expenses, or part of them by taking advantage of facilities available under the National Health Service Acts.»
Years ago, when I was Public Trustee
in Saskatchewan, I was asked to approve a settlement of a
personal injury action on behalf of a child,
in which the settlement amount was reduced by the amount of the parents» contributory negligence.
Jordan v Lowe was a
personal injury action arising from an incident
in which a Vancouver Police Constable (Eric Jordan) was injured when the Defendant (Mark Lowe) drove a vehicle at high speed into Cst.
«I also expect to see rising activity related to
personal injury claims, as new rules coming into force will involve those cases being heard
in a specialist court —
which will see us working ever - closer with clients as they prepare to pursue or defend those
actions.»
4autoinsurancequote.com shall not be liable for any loss, damage,
injury, or claim, nor any special, indirect, incidental, consequential, exemplary or punitive damages of any kind, whether such
action is based
in tort, contract, negligence, strict liability, or otherwise and even if 4autoinsurancequote.com has been advised of the possibility of such damages,
which arises out of or relates
in any way to: (i) the Site, materials
in the Site, or the inability to use the Site; (ii) any Third - Party Site, materials
in any Third - Party Site, or the inability to use any Third - Party Site; (iii) any defect, omission, error, interruption, delay, or computer virus; or, (iv) except as a result of 4autoinsurancequote.com's gross negligence or intentional
actions, the unauthorized alteration of or access to your transmissions or
personal data.
While spiritual creatures from other realms are not a covered peril for
personal property, we expect that if a poltergeist somehow forced you to take a specific
action which resulted
in bodily
injury or property damage to another person, you could well have coverage under the liability section of your Erie, PA renters insurance policy.