Sentences with phrase «in a worse position when»

Think, the club will actually be in a worse position when he leaves than when he started.

In a half - hearted attempt to provide a degree of balance, the article quotes the ISC's claims about how the academies sponsored by private schools were in a bad position when they were taken over.

Understanding how things affect your credit score is the first step to taking control over your financial health and making sure you don't put yourself in a bad position when you take out a loan.

Three, you're putting your replacement in a bad position when you ask them to step up at the eleventh hour.

Those people are further left in bad positions when there's a fire or other significant loss, because there may not be another unit available for them to move into at the same price.

Not exact matches

If he attempted it on his own he would have wasted valuable time and money trying to figure it out, putting him in a worse position than when he started.

It is the worst version of power play when people are seeking someone's mentorship for things that are critical to their livelihood, and then they're put in that position.

The reality of such costs is confirmed, at least anecdotally, when one recalls that both Enron and WorldCom — the poster children of bad corporate governance in the last decade — had separated the CEO and Chairman positions.

Assuming that the total amount of bad debt in the banking system exceeds total bank capital — something which is almost certainly true — the conversion of debt which can not be serviced into an equity position that is unlikely to generate much more (and in an economic downturn, which is when we are most concerned about the debt burden, we can assume that the decline in value of these equity positions will be highly correlated) leaves the net indebtedness of the banking system unchanged, and so the contingent liabilities of the government are unchanged even as reported debt in the system declines.

In June, when Raghuram Rajan announced he would leave his position as the head of the Reserve Bank of India and return to academia (he had been on leave from the University of Chicago), India watchers feared the worst.

 The Harper government's decision last year to write off every penny of the auto aid and thus build it all into last year's deficit calculation (which I questioned at the time as curious and even misleading) has already been proven wrong. Since the money was already «written off» by Ottawa as a loss (on grounds that they had little confidence it would be repaid — contradicting their own assurances at the same time that it was an «investment,» not a bail - out), any repayment will come as a gain that can be recorded in the budget on the revenue side. Jim Flaherty has learned from past Finance Ministers (especially Paul Martin) that it's always politically better to make the budget situation look worse than it is (even when the bottom has fallen out of the balance), thus positioning yourself to triumphantly announce «surprising good news» (due, no doubt, to «careful fiscal management») down the road. The auto package could thus generate as much as $ 10 billion in «surprising good news» for Ottawa in the years to come (depending on the ultimate worth of the public equity share).

But in how much worse position he was when he attempted the whole problem of man and the world!

When we say «Love the Sinner; Hate the Sin» we ourselves commit the worse sin possible, by setting ourselves up in the position of God to decide which sin is acceptable and which is not.

To make matters even worse, those who have experience working in Catholic schools are often at a disadvantage when compared to other applicants for well - paying public school positions.

When it comes to aches and pains we tend to put it down to something simple, like a bad nights sleep in an awkward position or lifting something heavy.

If and when Wenger leaves he will likely leave this club in a worse position than he found it which is a pitty for a guy who likes to pride himslef on all the change he brought.

It's amazing what happens when you put players in a position to just do the things they're best at, and avoid doing the things they're worst at.

When the champions league squads are submitted later this week, you will see we are not in such a bad position.

Seven of the eight MLB teams in playoff position last weekend were expected, more or less, to be there — they were no worse than cofavorites in their division or a top contender for the wild card when the season began.

1) On the pitch: - we always start 3 -4-3 but always switch back to a back 4... it isn't tactical as we look bad in both - Bellerin playibg LWB when you have the best in the bundesliga last season on the bench - Welbeck playing the striker role when he can do everything but score when you have Lacazette a record signing on the - Monreal in back 3 when you have Kostafi who can flank Per in the middle protecting him against pace as well as having a commending figure and - Telling Xhaka to not play as a 3rd offensive player when Ramsey dashes - Playing a guy in Ox so out of position and persisting with him over preseason as if he would be there for years when it is clear he doesn't want to play for us (his case is a weird one)

Flamini is not bad when paired with another holding midfielder, but we need a player in that position who can thrive in isolation.

They are often in position (when not it is because of their own mistake mostly instead of a scheme thing) but then either get overpowered by the receiver or make a bad play on the ball.

I preferred the blow up option, but I am now of the belief that it was hardly feasible in current context, even worse with our biggest assets not being 100 %, positions with little market, or under controle for 2020 - 21 when the next wave arrives.

His 3B defense was so bad last year he was basically moved off the position in June and moved back to second base while Asdrubal Cabrera took over third when healthy.

I think Oz is fragile physically and mentally, the premier league is very physiacal so he would always struggle in this section, add that to him beeing played and overuse in a position (LW) that does not suit him and he s lost and dejected quickly.People ask him to be tougher but some people are just by nature more fragile, with depressive tendancy.The guy should play in his favourite role and not be overuse as he probably hates himself when he has bad games.

The loss against Watford — although I was gutted, I am glad at the same time, because questions are going to asked, namely «why when we were in such a strong position at the beginning of the season did it end up so bad» and, secondly, «with a year remaining on his deal is it really worthwhile keeping Wenger on?»

When we lose these two players we will be left in a position where things will be even worse.

wow are we sterile up top, goals need to come from defense again, ozil & cech were great, mert once again taking the brunt of bad comments meanwhile a clean sheet and did nothing wrong, open goal that was saved was kos out of position and monreal caught up the pitch too high, giroud has great ball skills, issue is his position on the pitch, watched the match again focused on giroud, he tends to camp behind the defender from the ball, this only works when you have the quickness to break, he does nt, I have screen shots where ozil is 25 yrds farther up the pitch then giroud, thisis the problem, he is rendered useless unless ozil holds up, and thats not ozils strength, thus very few sog's from giroud on the run, when giroud gets lucky w space in front of the defender, he is lethal, but needs to get into that space,

My choice is for him to go when he was number 1 we had 5 years of him making wrong calls... really bad positioning and a lot of laps in focus...

They have a shelf life of 8/10 years at the very top if they are lucky so who can begrudge them the opportunity to make hay whilst the sun is shining... am not saying Sanchez is not money driven but the way the guy plays i can mortgage my life he actually enjoys the game, enjoys wining first and foremost then money comes 2nd... like the author of the article rightly pointed out, he was in Messi's shadow at Barca and could not express himself fully, now he is at a club where he is the main man and given a free role and license to express himself and i very much doubt if he will want to go to a club like Madrid (as been rumoured in the dailies today) to relieve the bad experience he suffered at Barca because let us face facts, he is never going to displace CR7 as the main man, so even if Madrid sells Benzema or Bale to make room for him he will be back to the same position he was at Barca, this time he will be playing 2nd fiddle to CR7 so my guess is all the Madrid talks is been fed the press by his agents to drive a hard bargain when contract extension talks resumes.....

Ozil made a bit of a bad decision as the ball was played in by trying to cut it out when he was never getting there, but that doesn't shield Mert who stood still while Finnbogason knocked a beach football flick around him, or Ospina's positioning when he dropped his clanger.

Second, when he played in that position he did not do a good job, he was barely average or worse, so i just do nt get the logic.

Even though at times, when he did make a foray forward to help the attack he linked up well with the likes of Sanchez and others and for a man of his size and ability, could often get himself in good offensive positions and out of bad ones.

The club is in a much worse position now than what it was when Wenger arrived, so he has destroyed his own legacy in my opinion, and damaged the reputation of the club.

This Manager would have been sacked 10 years ago at any other Top Premier League club for his complete mis - management which has led to us being in a far worse position than when he took over and made us the current laughing stock of European Football.

Instead I chose to acknowlege how a bad injury in 2001 undermined Sylvinho's development at a time when he acted as a backup to Roberto Carlos in the left - back position.

Flamini does nt have the ability to bring d ball out from defense to attack, he cant dictate the play nor launch attack from his position which is bad especially when you compare him to the way modern defensive midfielders plays this days... Things has evolved, good and modern coaches now prefers to have ball playing and technical defenders, we have that in koscieny and Gabriel, also our full backs are excellent with the ball, but Flamini is not, you can see all see how we kept on loosing possession against Liverpool.

Whether draxler or not arsenal is still a weaker team, is it something bad if we have both draxler and Sanchez in the same team fighting for places, just imagine van persie, Sanchez, ozil, carzola are in the same team, with likes of inform konsieny, mustafi, and konlansinic, and good holding midfider,... our problem with this 343 information or 3421 information apart from Wenger playing players out of position we don't have a strong holdmidfider that retrieve the ball back when we lost possession... Kant's is perfect example of that, look at the job he does at Chelsea is amazing...... without a good holding midfielder our defenders are vulnerable

and when i say no scoring instinct i do nt mean he has a bad shot, he just doesn't have the instincts to know when to shoot or get in a position where he can shoot.

We have the worst injury record in Premier Leaugue for many seasons,»cause stubborn Wenger does not use subtitutes, trains them wrong in trainig, do not rotate, overplays his favorite players o after injuries, they will be in sartigline up too fast, (Rambo, Willshere, Walcott, Diaby etc.) and plays players in wrong position like our Diamond Özil, who has shown every time when he plays in his best position, number 10 CAM, he creates more chances, remember Villa game earlier his season, so Wenger OUT and fast.

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

The Oklahoma State Cowboys were driving down the field in prime position to tie the game against the Missouri Tigers when the worst happened.

Madrid, for instance; the fans boo even Ronaldo when they think he's done badly, like when he doesn't pass the ball to someone in a better scoring position.

Right when you think a corner is being turned a bad performance can pop out of nowhere so Milan definitely have a chance, but we've put ourselves in a good position after 1st leg.

Was not analyzing the Manchester ss and don't really care much there but from a footballing point of view and from the words of MR wenger I understand the logic I do nt read what the media thinks neither My comment above addresses the issues we face in comparison to the two previous seasons adding in our re enforcements The 22 million question «Are the Arsenal capable of achieving 85 point come next May???» I believed we were strong last year and said it here that the team was strong and together and used the very words that MR wenger used cohesion but as the season unfolded the cracks showed up at the very beginning when we lost to west ham and it got worse as we lost pole position and every thing around us came tumbling down by February last season here comes another important question did they know and understand what happened do they know what to do this term to avoid the very same faith well we wait and see Irregardless of what happens I will support Arsenal and will keep analyzing every match my way until May so Good luck Arsenal with your endeavors and hope you do well against Liverpool keep the fight on keep the heads up and give them a good beating

When Wenger made absolutely no effort to get him, who was someone who would fit in with being an ideal team member for Wenger, as well playing in a position in which we are in desperate need of reinforcement, I feared the worst for the rest of the transfer window.

Monreal could partner Koscielny in the CB positions and Gibbs who hasn't been that bad when being called upon, could cover the LB position, he has more pace than Monreal.

Given our injury record that gamble looks like utter stupidity its like pinning all your hopes on diaby being the saviour in the cdm position and then blaming bad luck when he gets injured 2 games in.

Wenger loves Arsenal so I can't see him leaving us in such a bad position when there are quality players available.

Ozil best position is behind the striker, when we put him wide it limits is capability not to say he will play badly, but may cause him to get stuck in one direction.