Sentences with phrase «in affirmative»

If you answered in the affirmative, I suggest you take a good look around.

If what I am saying in terms of my understanding of your mindset is correct, than you would answer in the affirmative by saying: yes, you are correct!

Please stand, raise your right hand and, following the question I pose, answer in the affirmative if you do so affirm.

Please stand, raise your right hand and, following the question I pose, answer in the affirmative if you do so swear.

Wishfull thinking in the affirmative re revolving door elected officials» power is a pipe dream in realty; in other words, it is a classic example of an oxymoron.

Presuming all the above — answers in the affirmative would lead to what?

The occasional slip by a parent in the affirmative obligation to promote the relationship between the child and the other parent is far different than a campaign of disparagement and designed interference with that relationship.

This question has been resolved in the affirmative by Mabo v Queensland (No. 2)(1992) 175 CLR 1 and subsequent cases.

He specializes in affirmative therapy with sexual & gender minorities and the treatment of couples and families dealing with anxiety disorders, trauma, eating disorders, addictions, and infidelity.

When I answer in the affirmative, they are excited and usually mention that the previous attorneys they have spoken with have never heard of this new type of divorce.

When we are sitting around with a group of friends and somebody asks, «Do you remember...» and others nod in the affirmative they are using their cognitive resources in their most basic form.

Make sure you state your goals in an affirmative manner.

Support for federal contractors in affirmative action plan development.

The answer to this question is in the affirmative.

When at the cardiologist's office, his staff also called Seven Corners to confirm coverage, and were given an answer in the affirmative.

Professor Rambo makes the case in the affirmative, arguing that judicial speech — even far off the bench — should be regulated via the Pickering test applicable to public employees.

The Justice Department's civil rights division is planning to sue colleges and universities that engage in «intentional race - based discrimination» in their affirmative action policies — that is, discrimination against white applicants.

in the affirmative, then it is a reasonable inference that the person will do so.

(With that decision, the Eleventh Circuit becomes the second federal appellate court to answer that question in the affirmative, with the Fifth Circuit having done so in 2013).

The appellate court allowed leave to appeal and answered the certified question in the affirmative.

Similarly, the de minimis test may only play a role after the «but for» test has been answered in the affirmative.

Only if the answer to that first question is in the affirmative will it be necessary to determine whether that right of residence can be made conditional upon the person concerned having sufficient resources not to apply for the benefit.

The Court then scrutinized the unique manageability issues inherent in the affirmative defenses likely to arise in misclassification cases:

The Maine Supreme Court answered in the affirmative, not relying on the Restatement language, but based on the facts presented in the case, determining that liability could be established on a theory of simple negligence.

The full version of the report — which was available via Hulu.com last week but has since been withdrawn — discloses that NBC gave the story only five minutes — an eternity now, but not remarkable for a major story of the day in 1979 — before moving on to a report on that day's argument in the U.S. Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. Weber:

In 1999, the Supreme Court answered that question in the affirmative.

The court determined that in answering question 6 (c) in the affirmative and providing Lloyds with a copy of the Great American Notice, Coventree Inc. ensured that Lloyds was aware of the potential claims that could be made during the Lloyds Policy period.

The appeal raised three questions, all answered in the affirmative: at his s. 8 application, was the appellant entitled to rely on the Crown's theory that he authored texts to establish his subjective expectation of privacy in them; if so, was the appellant's subjective expectation of privacy objectively reasonable such that he had standing to make a s. 8 claim; did the production order here provide lawful authority for seizing records in the hands of a service provider.

Justice Laskin repeated the conclusions of the trial judge, at paras. 21 - 2, that the denial was «not a credible account of what happened» and the «memory lapse is almost silent evidence in the affirmative».

The Alberta Court of Appeal concurs with the trial judge's reasoning; answering both questions in the affirmative.

The B.C.S.C answered the question in the affirmative, holding the use of the property as a golf course could be considered in assessing the value of the land to determine its highest and best use.

If the answer is in the affirmative, we are in agreement.

First, he testified Abdi had asked the complainants if they knew where to get marijuana — a question the complainants apparently answered in the affirmative (even indicating they had a source).

As to the first issue, the Court held in the affirmative.

This post tries to consider these questions and suggests that we should answer the last one in the affirmative.

When asked if a new pre-action protocol regime should be introduced before the specialist Personal Injury Court, the Faculty answered in the affirmative:

The controlling authority, the Appeals Court case Specialized Technology Resources, Inc. v. JPS Elastomerics Corp., answers that question in the affirmative.

It found that this question should be answered in the affirmative «absent a clear prohibition in the Criminal Code, absent proven bodily harm that would vitiate consent at common law, and absent any evidence that the conscious partner subjected the unconscious partner to sexual activity beyond their agreement» (at para. 80).

If you answered this question in the affirmative, you are not alone.

The Supreme Court of Canada answered this question in the affirmative in the London Drugs and Fraser Rivers decisions.

And in my case, the answers were all in the affirmative.

You may have a good chance at a favorable outcome in a personal injury claim if you can answer one or more of these questions in the affirmative.

That question was to be answered in the affirmative in the instant case.

The concept of «legitimate interest» could then be dispensed with entirely (although it certainly does exist in the case law, in the affirmative but apparently not in the negative).

Second, should this question be answered in the affirmative, the referring court asked the CJEU to shed light on the procedural consequences (question 4) and whether in that case the referring court can assume jurisdiction under Article 31, which requires a «real connecting link» between the subject matter of the measure sought and the territorial jurisdiction of the Member State (questions 5 and 6).

There is another aspect of Twitter that addresses this question — if you have a blog or web page and use it to market your practice — then this question should be answered in the affirmative.

This question was unanimously answered in the affirmative by the Ontario Court of Appeal in James Street Hardware and Furniture Co v Spizziri and further expanded upon by the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Nan v. Black Pine Manufacturing Ltd..

However, by the time the accused is given his third opportunity to call a lawyer, has refused for the third time, and has replied in response to a question as to whether he understands, in the affirmative, I am of the view that the police have complied with their obligations pursuant to s. 10 (b) of the Charter.

The trial judge at the Provincial Court of Alberta answered this question in the affirmative (2008 ABPC 232), but this decision was reversed by the Court of Queen's Bench (2009 ABQB 745), and the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal by the appellants (2014 ABCA 71).

If the answer to each question was in the affirmative, then there had to be a strong presumption that any alterations in the control order strengthening the restrictions were unnecessary.