«Greed works most of the time, even for the large majority of people
in affluent societies.»
But there is also a wealth of clinical data showing that, even
in affluent societies, breastfed babies, and their mothers incidentally, are much better off than formula fed babies.
So it seems that home - births ARE a great and safe option for well educated, healthy, wealthy, mothers who live
in affluent societies with good infrastructure.
We're also divided on what it means to serve the poor
in an affluent society.
The pastor realizes that people's needs are virtually limitless, particularly
in an affluent society in which there is an ever - rising threshold of desire (which we define as «need»).
But
in an affluent society one has got to be tempted, at least once, to see what it is like to be out from under the weight of so many possessions.
In 1970, JK Galbraith observed
in The Affluent Society that «few things are more evident in modern social history than the decline of interest in inequality as an economic issue».
«My husband and I deliberated for years about whether to have a child at all, partly because parenting
in an affluent society is, shall we say, a carbon - intensive activity, and partly because we knew that future generations will probably have to contend with the consequences of a severely disrupted climate.
Not exact matches
It is they who are reminding voters that casinos redistribute wealth from the poorest
in society up the ladder towards the most
affluent, make no contribution to long term economic growth, and cause social ills
in the communities where they are built.
Even
in the face of economic turmoil, we are still one of the most
affluent societies on earth.
Certainly it must be tempting to look at all you're doing without, especially
in comparison to much of our
affluent society, and to feel that you are better, that you have demonstrated your faith and devotion — maybe even to feel you have done your part.
So even though trying to live faithfully as part of an
affluent society, with all the temptations this entails, is
in some ways more difficult and more uncomfortable than living the radical response, it does have several important advantages:
This is the great challenge to those of us who remain members of the
affluent society, those of us who are unable or unwilling to make the sacrifices or the great change
in lifestyle of the radical response: are we able to be serious about our faith?
Likewise it is heresy to suppose that the
affluent and those who have more than their fair share of power and status
in society deserve to be ignored or blamed for their circumstances to the extent that the church makes them no offer of grace since they already enjoy so many of the other good things of life.
The most obvious result is that poverty is overflowing geographical frontiers and gradually finding a place
in the bosom of
affluent societies.
«We live
in one of the most
affluent cultures
in history where many of the values of an increasingly materialistic
society stand
in direct conflict with the gospel vision,» they charged.
Mariani notes that Stevens had a withdrawn manner at home and an unpleasant one
in the office, but none of this stopped him from becoming rich and successful and, eventually, joining
affluent society after the family settled
in Hartford, Connecticut,
in 1916.
Historically the Churches have generally been rather on the side of the wealthy and powerful due to the common interests of the Churches and of the
affluent in society.
Obviously, there are many people
in affluent, industrial
societies who have interesting work and live
in satisfying communities.
If I were running the government, I would see to it that school districts that serve the poor would have a larger share of the tax revenue than school districts that serve the
affluent, for
in the poor districts there is far more ground to be made up to provide the open equality of opportunity, and equality of opportunity must be a part of every just
society.
A little - known essay by Tocqueville after he visited England and tried to figure out why the most
affluent society in Europe had the most paupers, while many impoverished
societies apparently had none at all.
If we act, it is because God has loved us, because we have been saved, because God's Spirit dwells
in us, because we have received revelation, and not at all
in order that we may be saved, or that others may be converted, or that
society may become Christian or happy or just or
affluent, or that we may overcome hunger or be good politicians.
Modern
society in its accelerating withdrawal into
affluent pleasantness needs the category of sensuality to interpret its self - ignoring life.
We know that our day - by - day participation
in this
affluent, consumption - oriented,
society embodies an unsustainable lifestyle that is exploiting hundreds of millions of workers around the world.
An objective look at the life of every
society, even the most
affluent and those which are, theoretically, more just, will show the reality of the poor today
in the marginalized, the drop - outs who can not cope with modern
society, the prisoners of conscience, the dissidents.
In a world where the marginalized and the drop outs of affluent society search desperately for comfort and identity in drugs or esoteric cults, how imperative it is to announce that he has come so that all may have life and may have it in all fullness (John 10: 10
In a world where the marginalized and the drop outs of
affluent society search desperately for comfort and identity
in drugs or esoteric cults, how imperative it is to announce that he has come so that all may have life and may have it in all fullness (John 10: 10
in drugs or esoteric cults, how imperative it is to announce that he has come so that all may have life and may have it
in all fullness (John 10: 10
in all fullness (John 10: 10)!
The group has a strong sense of being
in a particular place, urban America, and at a particular time; born
in the twenties, just old enough [usually] to get into World War II, products of the
affluent society, very conscious of being white.
This is particularly important for congregations composed mostly of those who are relatively powerful
in a
society — more specifically,
in our
society, of white
affluent North Americans — and who therefore
in their daily dealings are not forced to listen to or to learn from those who are less fortunate.
The clean industries of the informational
society have added to the wealth of the South and the West, drawing
in the educated and the
affluent, while leaving behind the less adaptable industrial workers.
In less affluent societies, and in the past, we lived much more closely with other peopl
In less
affluent societies, and
in the past, we lived much more closely with other peopl
in the past, we lived much more closely with other people.
Not only have measures of well - being and happiness ceased to rise with economic growth but, as
affluent societies have grown richer, there have been long - term rises
in rates of anxiety, depression, and numerous other social problems.
«The quickest way to gain product acceptability
in the less
affluent society,» said a soy industry spokesman,»... is to have the product consumed on its own merit
in a more
affluent society.»
The dominance of salt
in manufactured food
in the sodium intake of
affluent societies
Sugar Daddie was established to help attractive young women get
in touch with the rich and
affluent of the
society for a mutually beneficial relationship.
In fact, according to an analysis by Urban Institute, students in Colorado's poorest districts receive only an additional $ 401 per student relative to more affluent districts, a ratio that has remained relatively unchanged for the past 20 years even as we get smarter about the impacts of income inequality and stratification across societ
In fact, according to an analysis by Urban Institute, students
in Colorado's poorest districts receive only an additional $ 401 per student relative to more affluent districts, a ratio that has remained relatively unchanged for the past 20 years even as we get smarter about the impacts of income inequality and stratification across societ
in Colorado's poorest districts receive only an additional $ 401 per student relative to more
affluent districts, a ratio that has remained relatively unchanged for the past 20 years even as we get smarter about the impacts of income inequality and stratification across
society.
Martin Luther King saw others «smothering
in an airtight cage of poverty
in the midst of an
affluent society» and knew it was morally wrong to turn away.
Its deft handling of crucial issues facing young people today and its exploration of the racial tensions and poverty - line discrimination that is still prevalent
in even the most
affluent, forward - thinking
societies paints a very genuine picture of life for teenagers, but it might not be a publishing industry marketing team's dream book.
Not only have measures of wellbeing and happiness ceased to rise with economic growth but, as
affluent societies have grown richer, there have been long - term rises
in rates of anxiety, depression and numerous other social problems.
Stephanie Kiwitt is using photography to observe public space and reflect on the increasing commercialization of everyday life
in our
affluent Western
society.
In the words of Marshall Sahlins, hunter - gatherers were «the original
affluent society.»
What is more, past global warming has included both minor and mass extinction events (e.g. PETM, Permian - Triassic extinction) so even if current warming is
in line with what's repeatedly been experienced
in the past, it doesn't follow that either the process of warming or the end result are desireable from the perspective of maintaining an advanced,
affluent, complex human
society based on creating reliable surpluses of food for 7.5 + billion people.
Building on this critique, Speth goes on to conclude
in his book that: (1) «today's system of political economy, referred to here as modern capitalism, is destructive of the environment, and not
in a minor way but
in a way that profoundly threatens the planet» (2) «the
affluent societies have reached or soon will reach the point where, as Keynes put it, the economic problem has been solved... there is enough to go around» (3) «
in the more
affluent societies, modern capitalism is no longer enhancing human well - being» (4) «the international social movement for change — which refers to itself as «the irresistible rise of global anti-capitalism» — is stronger than many imagine and will grow stronger; there is a coalescing of forces: peace, social justice, community, ecology, feminism — a movement of movements» (5) «people and groups are busily planting the seeds of change through a host of alternative arrangements, and still other attractive directions for upgrading to a new operating system have been identified» (6) «the end of the Cold War... opens the door... for the questioning of today's capitalism.»
To me this would appear to be a worst case scenario, based on the least developed economies building up energy infrastructures largely using fossil fuels,
in order to pull their populations out of poverty, as China and India are doing today (thereby reducing their rate of population growth as they become more
affluent and improving their carbon efficiencies) and the remaining
societies continuing to improve their overall carbon efficiencies as they have already been doing.
More
affluent societies have lower birth rates which go a long way
in reducing pollution, greenhouse gases, and the drain on natural resources.
So if you are a privileged relatively
affluent person who does not like taxes (dreams of bureaucrats) and on the other hand loves «freedom» reigning
in society as well as
in nature, the worst thing now would be a surge of justified guilt feelings and then solidarity resulting from recognition of AGW.
If our hope is to deploy solar and wind capacity that maintains indefinitely the current throughput of energy
in the world's
affluent societies, then, yes, the situation is hopeless.
But juxtaposing the 100 - percent scenarios that promise a permanent high - energy economy with critiques showing such projects to be futile should lead us to a different vision altogether: that, at least
in affluent countries, it would be better simply to transform
society so that it operates on far less end - use energy while assuring sufficiency for all.
Unless colossal efforts are undertaken now to halt the emission of greenhouse gases, those living
in less
affluent societies can expect to suffer from extremes of flooding, drought, starvation, disease, and death
in potentially staggering numbers.
The exception to that may be those who have a high number of lawyers
in their social and familial circles, i.e. the
affluent and influential members of
society who were never at risk for being confused over who the identity of the regulator is, or perhaps have rubbed shoulders with graduates of a prestigious Toronto school which shares the same name.
Those who are
affluent have some of the greatest concern, due to the fact that
in our litigious
society, people are more likely to sue those who appear to have the means to pay.