He has more than 35 years of experience
in aircraft financing.
Messrs. Boresjo and Moody concentrate their practice
in the aircraft finance arena, handling a variety of complex finance and leasing transactions.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected
in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered
in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business
aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases
in the build rates of certain
aircraft; 6) the effect on
aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business
aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business
aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest
in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions
in the industries and markets
in which we operate
in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations
in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain
in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of
aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to
finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both
in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes
in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction
in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco
in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier
financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations
in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
«Unfortunately, the Commerce Department decision is divorced from this reality and ignores long - standing business practices
in the aerospace industry, including launch pricing and the
financing of multibillion dollar
aircraft programs,» the company said
in a statement.
It is mostly private companies that specialize
in this type of
financing, with programs designed for specific industries, such as the motor - vehicle,
aircraft and industrial equipment sectors, although some banks can provide export - leasing services through subsidiaries.
The House passed the bill that would require the Treasury secretary to report to Congress on any U.S. or foreign financial institutions that are involved
in financing the purchase or export of
aircraft on behalf of Iran, and to certify that such transactions pose no money - laundering or terrorism -
financing risk.
Iranian
Aircraft Purchase Transactions — Vote Passed (252 - 167, 12 Not Voting) The House passed the bill that would require the Treasury secretary to report to Congress on any U.S. or foreign financial institutions that are involved in financing the purchase or export of aircraft on behalf of Iran, and to certify that such transactions pose no money - laundering or terrorism - financi
Aircraft Purchase Transactions — Vote Passed (252 - 167, 12 Not Voting) The House passed the bill that would require the Treasury secretary to report to Congress on any U.S. or foreign financial institutions that are involved
in financing the purchase or export of
aircraft on behalf of Iran, and to certify that such transactions pose no money - laundering or terrorism - financi
aircraft on behalf of Iran, and to certify that such transactions pose no money - laundering or terrorism -
financing risk.
Without long - term public
finance in sustaining Concorde, despite it never covering its development costs, France would not have retained the advanced engineering capacity
in aircraft that made Airbus possible.
An average person living near an airport stands only a 1
in 75 chance of being woken by
aircraft, according to a study on
aircraft noise and sleep disturbance
financed by the Department of Transport.
After crediting the trust fund with the proper amount
in IOUs, the government spends the extra Social Security tax collections just like any other tax revenue — to
finance anything from
aircraft carriers to education research.
AerCap Holdings NV operates as an integrated aviation company, which is engaged
in the leasing,
financing, trading, sales and management of commercial
aircraft and engines.
The signing agreement of the
aircraft delivery took place earlier
in Jakarta, with Garuda striking a deal with Avions de Transport Regional and the Danish leasing and
financing firm, Nordic Aviation Capital.
Whether you're
in need of a loan or a line of credit for everyday purchases, or a custom solution to
finance commercial real estate, a private
aircraft, or life insurance premiums, you can depend on your private banker to help you meet your goals.
Obtained summary judgment for the leasing and
financing arm of an
aircraft manufacturer
in a fraud and breach of contract case surrounding a sale and leaseback arrangement with a potential buyer.
Asset
Finance is the lending of money to a borrower
in order to buy an asset such as a ship,
aircraft or machinery;
Specifically
in relation to aviation
finance, we have extensive experience representing airlines, equity providers, sponsors, owners, arrangers, debt providers, residual value providers, defeasance institutions and other participants
in a wide range of
aircraft finance transactions, including domestic and cross-border debt and
finance / capital and operating leases.
He also advises clients
in relation to
aircraft purchase and
finance transactions.
Dev specializes
in Mergers & Acquisition
Finance / Banking, Investment Management, Lease and Transportation
Finance, Private Equity and Venture Capital, Structured
Finance,
Aircraft Finance and leasing; Project
Finance, securities, capital markets practices, regulatory compliance, antitrust and competition, setting up of offshore companies, offshore fund and Collective Investment Scheme, on international banking and privatization.
Richard Leishman advises lenders, borrowers and investors
in infrastructure
financing transactions
in areas such as maritime,
aircraft, telecommunications and renewable energy.
Advising our client on complex hybrid
financing involving
aircraft engines and components
in a multi-jurisdictional transaction amounting to over US$ 200 million.
Sean's practice focuses on the representation of lenders, equity investors, domestic and foreign airlines and other borrower / lessees
in all types of
financing transactions, including equipment
financing matters, leveraged and cross-border leasing, secured and unsecured lending transactions, private and public debt placements and syndicated loan facilities involving a wide variety of facilities and equipment types, including
aircraft, railcars and ocean - going vessels.
Representation of the financial subsidiary of a major manufacturing corporation
in numerous
financings of commercial
aircraft with an aggregate value of over $ 1 billion
Represented Emirates
in connection with its 2012 ($ 588 million) and 2013 ($ 630 million) debt offerings of Enhanced Equipment Trust Certificates, the proceeds of which
financed the acquisition of four Airbus A380 model
aircraft to be leased to the airline
Represented
aircraft manufacturers
in a variety of
financing transactions which included, among other structures, financial and residual guarantees, lease
in - lease out arrangements, ECA guarantees, and ECA supported debt offerings
The Chambers was set up
in response to the demand for Mauritius - based lawyers with international exposure and specialized expertise
in the fields of International Trust, International
Finance, Banking Law, Shipping Law,
Aircraft Finance and Leasing, Project
Finance, Corporate & Commercial Law, Litigation and cross border insolvency, tracing and debts recovery, enforcement of foreign judgments, arbitral arwards, arrest of foreign vessels and drafting of transactional / security documents.
Lawyers
in this office also handle asset - based lending, including ship and
aircraft finance, and equipment leasing.
Name: Dev R. Erriah Title: Barrister Degree: LLB, LLM, TEP Specialises
in: Mergers & Acquisition
Finance / Banking, Investment Management, Lease and Transportation
Finance, Private Equity and Venture Capital, Structured
Finance,
Aircraft Finance and leasing; Project
Finance, securities, capital markets practices, regulatory compliance, antitrust and competition, setting up of offshore companies, offshore fund and Collective Investment Scheme, on international banking and privatization.
As part of her post qualification experience Hilary spent over two years
in Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer's Paris office gaining experience of
aircraft finance work and is fluent
in French.
Financing subsidiary of original equipment manufacturer
in noteworthy leasing and subleasing transaction involving 80
aircraft and 2 major US airlines.
Financing subsidiary of original equipment manufacturer
in varied manufacturer - assisted
financings of
aircraft
A computer generated image of the hybrid - electric regional
aircraft being developed by Zunum Aero, a start - up partly
financed by US aeronautics group Boeing that could enter service as soon as
in...
Represented top
aircraft operating lessors
in connection with equipment sales and acquisitions, novation, and asset - backed
financings
Texas allows licensed real estate brokers to use a drone to capture property images
in connection with the marketing, sale, or financing of real property, and insurance company employees or affiliates may capture images using an unmanned aircraft in connection with an insurance policy or claim regarding real property or a structure on property.14 In Louisiana, the use of a drone for the purpose of spying upon others or otherwise invading the privacy of others is a criminal offense.15 Use of a drone in the space above property with intent to conduct surveillance constitutes «remaining in or upon property» or «entering upon immovable property» under the offense of criminal trespass.16 South Dakota passed a law making it a misdemeanor to land a drone on lands or water of another resident.17 The owner or lessee of the drone is liable for damage resulting from a forced landing of the drone.18 In Oregon, a property owner may bring a claim for invasion of privacy against a drone operator who flies over their property without permission (unless the drone operator complied with FAA requirements).
in connection with the marketing, sale, or
financing of real property, and insurance company employees or affiliates may capture images using an unmanned
aircraft in connection with an insurance policy or claim regarding real property or a structure on property.14 In Louisiana, the use of a drone for the purpose of spying upon others or otherwise invading the privacy of others is a criminal offense.15 Use of a drone in the space above property with intent to conduct surveillance constitutes «remaining in or upon property» or «entering upon immovable property» under the offense of criminal trespass.16 South Dakota passed a law making it a misdemeanor to land a drone on lands or water of another resident.17 The owner or lessee of the drone is liable for damage resulting from a forced landing of the drone.18 In Oregon, a property owner may bring a claim for invasion of privacy against a drone operator who flies over their property without permission (unless the drone operator complied with FAA requirements).
in connection with an insurance policy or claim regarding real property or a structure on property.14
In Louisiana, the use of a drone for the purpose of spying upon others or otherwise invading the privacy of others is a criminal offense.15 Use of a drone in the space above property with intent to conduct surveillance constitutes «remaining in or upon property» or «entering upon immovable property» under the offense of criminal trespass.16 South Dakota passed a law making it a misdemeanor to land a drone on lands or water of another resident.17 The owner or lessee of the drone is liable for damage resulting from a forced landing of the drone.18 In Oregon, a property owner may bring a claim for invasion of privacy against a drone operator who flies over their property without permission (unless the drone operator complied with FAA requirements).
In Louisiana, the use of a drone for the purpose of spying upon others or otherwise invading the privacy of others is a criminal offense.15 Use of a drone
in the space above property with intent to conduct surveillance constitutes «remaining in or upon property» or «entering upon immovable property» under the offense of criminal trespass.16 South Dakota passed a law making it a misdemeanor to land a drone on lands or water of another resident.17 The owner or lessee of the drone is liable for damage resulting from a forced landing of the drone.18 In Oregon, a property owner may bring a claim for invasion of privacy against a drone operator who flies over their property without permission (unless the drone operator complied with FAA requirements).
in the space above property with intent to conduct surveillance constitutes «remaining
in or upon property» or «entering upon immovable property» under the offense of criminal trespass.16 South Dakota passed a law making it a misdemeanor to land a drone on lands or water of another resident.17 The owner or lessee of the drone is liable for damage resulting from a forced landing of the drone.18 In Oregon, a property owner may bring a claim for invasion of privacy against a drone operator who flies over their property without permission (unless the drone operator complied with FAA requirements).
in or upon property» or «entering upon immovable property» under the offense of criminal trespass.16 South Dakota passed a law making it a misdemeanor to land a drone on lands or water of another resident.17 The owner or lessee of the drone is liable for damage resulting from a forced landing of the drone.18
In Oregon, a property owner may bring a claim for invasion of privacy against a drone operator who flies over their property without permission (unless the drone operator complied with FAA requirements).
In Oregon, a property owner may bring a claim for invasion of privacy against a drone operator who flies over their property without permission (unless the drone operator complied with FAA requirements).19