The issue of «similarity» does arise
in alleged cases of non-copying, especially in music, where two tunes can be similar, but the combinatorics of music is such that accidental similarity can arise.
Not exact matches
Uber has sought arbitration
in other
cases involving
alleged sexual violence against its passengers by drivers, as well as
in battles with its drivers seeking better compensation.
The incident is a
case study
in how companies
in the pharmaceutical supply chain have come under fire for their
alleged role
in the country's opioid crisis and of the questions that have been raised about the responsibility of middleman companies that distribute prescription painkillers.
But
in this
case, the documents concern the
alleged Wal - Mart Mexico bribery scandal, which I wrote about twice for Fortune
in May 2012 following the New York Times investigation and articles.
In a filing with the federal court in East St. Louis, Illinois, lawyers for the plaintiffs called the settlement the «largest ever» in a case alleging excessive fees in 401 (k) litigatio
In a filing with the federal court
in East St. Louis, Illinois, lawyers for the plaintiffs called the settlement the «largest ever» in a case alleging excessive fees in 401 (k) litigatio
in East St. Louis, Illinois, lawyers for the plaintiffs called the settlement the «largest ever»
in a case alleging excessive fees in 401 (k) litigatio
in a
case alleging excessive fees
in 401 (k) litigatio
in 401 (k) litigation.
«Today's settlements demonstrate that if you engage
in conduct that violates the laws of the United States, as we
alleged in this
case, then even if you are doing so from across the ocean, you will have to answer for that conduct and turn over your ill - gotten gains.»
At issue
in Salman's appeal is whether the government
in insider trading
cases must prove that an
alleged source of corporate secrets like the brother -
in - law received a tangible benefit like cash
in exchange for any tips.
The president then
alleged that Obama bypassed a court rejection
in order to carry out the wiretapping, before suggesting that a «good lawyer could make a great
case out of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones
in October, just prior to Election!»
They «
allege their businesses have been placed at risk due to the cybersecurity incident and generally assert various common law claims such as claims for negligence and breach of contract, as well as,
in some
cases, statutory claims.»
In the original case, Daniels claims she signed a $ 130,000 agreement to stay silent about an alleged affair she had with Trump in 200
In the original
case, Daniels claims she signed a $ 130,000 agreement to stay silent about an
alleged affair she had with Trump
in 200
in 2006.
An affidavit filed
in support of Winner's arrest as well as the
case against her laid out some of these
alleged blunders, and security experts pointed out others.
Separately, Montroll and ColoGuys were previously sued
in a copyright
case alleging that a homemade sex tape was posted on a website hosted by a ColoGuys server without the copyright holder's consent.
Along similar lines,
in this most recent Citi
case, Rakoff has asked the SEC to explain why the court should «impose a judgment
in a
case in which the SEC
alleges a serious securities fraud but the defendant neither admits nor denies wrongdoing.»
While bro culture is typically defined as being led and dominated by men,
in the
case of Thinx, the complaint
alleged that the «only two employees who negotiated higher salaries at Thinx were men,» according to The New York Times.
The charges
in the Citi
case — along with the JP Morgan (jpm) and Goldman
cases from this year and last — represent the same kind of
alleged wrongdoing all three banks promised never to repeat when they settled with the SEC
in 2003.
It was
in this role that she was assigned to work with District Attorney Kevin R. Steele on the
case, which
alleged that Cosby had sexually assaulted Constand
in his home
in 2004.
That followed a
case filed
in January
alleging infringement on 14 specific patents.
Add to these bureaucratic inefficiencies the curious
case of Judy Sgro, the former immigration minister who resigned from cabinet
in January following a pair of scandals involving the
alleged preferential treatment of immigrants who were associated with her campaign office.
The complaint also
alleges other sites
in the
case make promises like by «simply buying Amazon reviews, you can beat your competition quite easily.»
In an August 10, 2009 hearing before Judge Rakoff in a case involving alleged disclosure issues at Bank of America (bac), Rakoff responded to the SEC's evasiveness by stating: «You are not going to be particularly effective with this court by telling me what I already know, namely, that you filed a rather uninformative bare bones complaint.&raqu
In an August 10, 2009 hearing before Judge Rakoff
in a case involving alleged disclosure issues at Bank of America (bac), Rakoff responded to the SEC's evasiveness by stating: «You are not going to be particularly effective with this court by telling me what I already know, namely, that you filed a rather uninformative bare bones complaint.&raqu
in a
case involving
alleged disclosure issues at Bank of America (bac), Rakoff responded to the SEC's evasiveness by stating: «You are not going to be particularly effective with this court by telling me what I already know, namely, that you filed a rather uninformative bare bones complaint.»
The NCAA had closed the
case after imposing sanctions on UNC, but reopened it
in 2014 after a former UNC basketball player
alleged that he had other people write papers for him.
Delta took an especially aggressive tack, suing three of its regional partners for what it
alleged were performance issues,
in each
case withholding millions of dollars
in payments it would have ordinarily owed.
Such a violation, if eventually confirmed by the Federal Trade Commission, could lead to many millions of dollars
in fines against Facebook, said David Vladeck, who as the director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection oversaw the investigation of
alleged privacy violations by Facebook and the subsequent consent decree resolving the
case in 2011.
In the
case, the twins
alleged that Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg took from their idea of a social network platform, which they developed while studying at Harvard University.
A decades - old
case of
alleged rape and suicide at a prestigious university is giving China a #MeToo moment — and showing the constraints confronted by social movements
in the authoritarian - ruled country.
The three
cases cover deals inked
in different circumstances and with different parties, but they are all trying to shield Trump and stop potentially damaging information —
alleged affairs
in the
case of Daniels and McDougal, and an
alleged toxic work environment
in another — from being made public.
A Westport man pleaded guilty Friday to patronizing a trafficked person
in a
case related to an
alleged sex ring involving troubled young men.
The
case, filed
in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York,
alleges breach of fiduciary duty under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
A chancellor
in Delaware has thrown out a
case brought by R3
alleging that Ripple breached a contract that would have allowed R3 to purchase 5 billion XRP from Ripple, effectively earning a profit of around $ 1 billion.
They point out that there have been plenty of
cases where shareholders have
alleged directors failed
in their duty of care.
While predatory pricing technically remains illegal, it is extremely difficult to win predatory pricing claims because courts now require proof that the
alleged predator would be able to raise prices and recoup its losses.405 Revising predatory pricing doctrine to reflect the economics of platform markets, where firms can sink money for years given unlimited investor backing, would require abandoning the recoupment requirement
in cases of below - cost pricing by dominant platforms.
In Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 98 the Supreme Court formalized this premise into a doctrinal test.The
case involved cigarette manufacturing, an industry dominated by six firms.99 Liggett, one of the six, introduced a line of generic cigarettes, which it sold for about 30 % less than the price of branded cigarettes.100 Liggett
alleged that when it became clear that its generics were diverting business from branded cigarettes, Brown & Williamson, a competing manufacturer, began selling its own generics at a loss.101 Liggett sued, claiming that Brown & Williamson's tactic was designed to pressure Liggett to raise prices on its generics, thus enabling Brown & Williamson to maintain high profits on branded cigarettes.
At issue
in the
case is whether SLUSA divests state courts of jurisdiction over class actions asserting claims arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (e.g., claims
alleging a material misstatement
in a registration statement).
On CTV's W5: Lead investigator Detective Sergeant Hank Idsinga reveals new details
in the
case involving
alleged serial killer Bruce McArthur.
The settlement for James Owens is the largest from the city
in an
alleged police misconduct
case.
Many have weighed
in on Uber's
alleged intellectual property theft
case, predicting that the upshot of this legal turmoil might be Uber retracting its self - driving efforts altogether.
The first line of
cases began with
In re Daou Sys., where the Ninth Circuit reversed a district court's decision dismissing a Section 10 (b) action on the ground that the plaintiffs had not alleged any disclosures that defendants were engaging in improper accounting practice
In re Daou Sys., where the Ninth Circuit reversed a district court's decision dismissing a Section 10 (b) action on the ground that the plaintiffs had not
alleged any disclosures that defendants were engaging
in improper accounting practice
in improper accounting practices.
The
case against Rand, filed
in a Virginia federal court,
alleged retaliation under the Family Medical Leave Act and the Americans With Disabilities Act.
There has been an interesting turn of events
in the
case of the
alleged India - based Ponzi scheme known as GainBitcoin.
In the sales video, Sean alleges that in most cases, the difference between you making profits and losing money lies squarely on the brokers engaged by binary options program
In the sales video, Sean
alleges that
in most cases, the difference between you making profits and losing money lies squarely on the brokers engaged by binary options program
in most
cases, the difference between you making profits and losing money lies squarely on the brokers engaged by binary options programs.
In the single most egregious case of alleged fraud, BP sued Mikal Watts in December 2013, alleging that the powerful San Antonio plaintiffs» attorney falsely claimed to represent tens of thousands of «phantom» victims of the -LSB-..
In the single most egregious
case of
alleged fraud, BP sued Mikal Watts
in December 2013, alleging that the powerful San Antonio plaintiffs» attorney falsely claimed to represent tens of thousands of «phantom» victims of the -LSB-..
in December 2013,
alleging that the powerful San Antonio plaintiffs» attorney falsely claimed to represent tens of thousands of «phantom» victims of the -LSB-...]
The Daniels
case has a lot
in common with the unfolding story of the Trump campaign's
alleged collusion with Russia — both involve allegations of campaign violations and financial malfeasance, of Trumpworld figures working behind the scenes to protect their candidate.
In the
case of McDougal, the
alleged payoff is more indirect but also involves a third party tied to Trump.
A finding that a measure such as the one adopted
in this
case relates
in pith and substance to a provincial head of power could encourage municipalities to systematically exercise the federal power to choose where to locate radiocommunication infrastructure while
alleging local interests
in support of their doing so.
It's probably important to consider whether we are talking about actions or
alleged laws that exist or not and
in either
case, is it related to the divine outside of us or are we talking about our own actions as related to
alleged external divine laws.
In other
cases this appeal
alleges, not that there is any experience of the present self which grounds all experience of the nonself, but that the most immediate objects of present human experience are the immediately preceding instances of human experience (cf., e.g., MMCL 444).
In Hartshorne's case, if we are in time, then God must be in time, too; «if we could not observe the actualization of the alleged possibility «there might have been nothing,» no more could God observe it..
In Hartshorne's
case, if we are
in time, then God must be in time, too; «if we could not observe the actualization of the alleged possibility «there might have been nothing,» no more could God observe it..
in time, then God must be
in time, too; «if we could not observe the actualization of the alleged possibility «there might have been nothing,» no more could God observe it..
in time, too; «if we could not observe the actualization of the
alleged possibility «there might have been nothing,» no more could God observe it....
Furthermore,
in this
case, the seemingly premeditated nature of some of the
alleged actions is chilling, as is the legal onslaught Julie had to deal with afterwards.
San Angelo, Texas (CNN)- Texas prosecutors rested their
case Wednesday
in the sexual assault trial of polygamous sect leader Warren Jeffs after playing a key piece of evidence for jurors: an audiotape they
allege documents his sexual assault of a 12 - year - old girl.
Many,
in this
case, believed the
alleged abuser.