That continuity is rooted
in apostolic succession, by which the whole mystery of Christ is handed on through the bishops.
Since the Catholic Church believes
in apostolic succession, they argue that the authority to forgive sins was passed down from the apostles through the Pope to the priests.
Not exact matches
In a cultural environment where all authority is suspect and the notion of divine authority is thought to be a psychological hangover from the premodern world, the claim that divine authority is transmitted in an unbroken chain of apostolic succession through the bishops of the Church in communion with the bishop of Rome seems literally incredibl
In a cultural environment where all authority is suspect and the notion of divine authority is thought to be a psychological hangover from the premodern world, the claim that divine authority is transmitted
in an unbroken chain of apostolic succession through the bishops of the Church in communion with the bishop of Rome seems literally incredibl
in an unbroken chain of
apostolic succession through the bishops of the Church
in communion with the bishop of Rome seems literally incredibl
in communion with the bishop of Rome seems literally incredible.
In the U.S. today there are dozens of lines of «apostolic succession» in which eccentric leaders with magnificent titles preside over tiny «Catholic» congregations in which almost everybody is a putative priest or bisho
In the U.S. today there are dozens of lines of «
apostolic succession»
in which eccentric leaders with magnificent titles preside over tiny «Catholic» congregations in which almost everybody is a putative priest or bisho
in which eccentric leaders with magnificent titles preside over tiny «Catholic» congregations
in which almost everybody is a putative priest or bisho
in which almost everybody is a putative priest or bishop.
Whatever is unique
in the Episcopal Church would be even more difficult to define
in the inner city; not many residents here are worried about
apostolic succession, valid sacraments or Henry VIII's sex life.
Raised a Protestant, despite all my thrashing and twisting I eventually couldn't help but believe that the
apostolic succession, through Peter as the designated leader and primus inter pares, is
in some logical or theological sense prior to everything else — including even Scripture, whose formation was guided and completed by the apostles and their successors, themselves inspired by the Holy Spirit.
Oddly, when Evangelicals say I'm not orthodox, they have to realize that Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox might say the same about them, since
apostolic succession and the primacy of the bishops aren't small matters
in those traditions.
reject the idea of
apostolic succession in the episcopate.
As I showed
in my review, no appeal to consensus can achieve the aim that Collins and Walls have
in mind, because there was broad consensus for at least a thousand years about the existence of an
apostolic succession in the episcopate — a doctrine that the authors consider themselves free to reject.
This does not mean that (for example) the Protestant denials of real presence or transubstantiation are now compatible with orthodoxy, or that the need to «cite
apostolic succession»
in relation to heterodox communities has ceased.
In the hands of Rome, then,
apostolic succession functions as a self - justifying and ever - dividing myth.
One who affirms a doctrine of
apostolic succession culminating
in the authority of the bishop of Rome must not only choose between
succession of teaching or
succession of office (as J. B. Lightfoot
in his own day understood), but also surmount the historiographical difficulty posed by the early Church's transition from apostles to presbyters, and from presbyters to a single monarchical bishop.
For, most confusingly, his John Knox persona suddenly turns into the reincarnation of Bishop Thomas Crammer, when, not forty pages later, he starts defending the hierarchy, albeit of the Anglican variety: «Pope Benedict XVI,» Wills sneers, «when he was still Cardinal Ratzinger, wrote
in 1998 that it is an infallible teaching of the church that Anglican bishops and priests are fake bishops and priests, dispensing fake sacraments, because they are outside the
apostolic succession.»
But he also denied that Christ instituted a hierarchical priesthood or meant to set
in train any
apostolic succession at all.
This
apostolic succession, they argued, was necessary
in order to have a legitimate ministry.
And, more than half a millennium later, when Paul came to Corinth to preach the gospel, the city was famous for its great temple of Aphrodite, with its battalions of «hierodules» who, we might say, stood
in a valid «
apostolic succession» to the kedeshot of Jeremiah's time.
This is a consistency guaranteed by the Lord himself: both
in the unity of his Person and
in the unity of his gift of inerrancy to the Church through the
apostolic succession.
It accounts for the development of the earliest form of
apostolic traditions and
apostolic succession among the early Church Fathers, particularly
in Irenaeus» Against Heresies.
Like his more speculative contemporary Ptolemy, a moderate Gnostic teacher, he undoubtedly thought of himself as standing
in «the
apostolic tradition»
in a «
succession» of teachers.24 Like pagan teachers and rabbis, Justin laid hands upon the head of each disciple on the completion of the course.25 At his trial, Justin, philosopher - prophet - teacher, describes the «school» where he has been teaching for the examining prefect, who will presently put him and several of his students to death.
In the West, whose apostolic see could claim the sanction of both the prince and the prophet among the apostles, the tendency was rather to stress (in the tradition of Clement of Rome, of Callistus, of Tertullian, of Cyprian, of Ambrose, and of Augustine) the Covenantal sanctions of the ministry in succession both to the apostles and to the Old Testament prophets and priest
In the West, whose
apostolic see could claim the sanction of both the prince and the prophet among the apostles, the tendency was rather to stress (
in the tradition of Clement of Rome, of Callistus, of Tertullian, of Cyprian, of Ambrose, and of Augustine) the Covenantal sanctions of the ministry in succession both to the apostles and to the Old Testament prophets and priest
in the tradition of Clement of Rome, of Callistus, of Tertullian, of Cyprian, of Ambrose, and of Augustine) the Covenantal sanctions of the ministry
in succession both to the apostles and to the Old Testament prophets and priest
in succession both to the apostles and to the Old Testament prophets and priests.
It was two outside churchmen who made the
apostolic claim for the teaching authority of the see
in Rome, namely: the Syrian Hegesippus, who was concerned to ascertain the true
apostolic doctrine as it was preserved
in the episcopal
succession, notably
in Rome up to Eleutherus (174 - 89); and especially the presbyter and later bishop of Lyons, Irenaeus (d. 177 or 8).
He provides us with a kind of scholarly
apostolic succession which began
in 1968 with him listening with one or two others to John Mason's lectures
in the chapter house of Oxford cathedral.