Sentences with phrase «in arguments like»

Your man - child mate will do anything to get your attention by engaging in arguments like a toddler would.

He may have had some truth in his argument like the previous results and how players left us.

There comes a point in an argument like this when you have to advance your own substantive arguments.

Not exact matches

The arguments for participating in such off - the - record briefings are fairly obvious, just as they were for technology titans like Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos and Apple CEO Tim Cook, who got roped into a tech summit with Trump at the Trump Tower last week.

That's the argument by KGI Securities analyst Ming - Chi Kuo, who told investors in a research note on Monday that the iPhone X's facial - scanning feature, Face ID, puts it one - and - a-half to two - and - a-half years ahead of rival technology in Android - based alternatives like Samsung's Galaxy S8.

Before this starts to sound like the annual lecture from management — perhaps you're one of those corporate employees forced to sleepwalk through an intranet quiz once in a while to prove to your higher - ups that you're familiar with the company's code of conduct — consider DeMars's argument for the value of the ethical office from a personal standpoint: «In order to live happily and at peace with ourselves, we have to live in ways that are congruent with our morals,» she arguein a while to prove to your higher - ups that you're familiar with the company's code of conduct — consider DeMars's argument for the value of the ethical office from a personal standpoint: «In order to live happily and at peace with ourselves, we have to live in ways that are congruent with our morals,» she argueIn order to live happily and at peace with ourselves, we have to live in ways that are congruent with our morals,» she arguein ways that are congruent with our morals,» she argues.

It presented two findings: First, the German public didn't like the reforms passed by Merkel's government in its first year; second, when the public was presented with arguments and data justifying the reforms, it liked them even less.

«Even the very first day we got into — not an argument — but he's like, «Well what would you do in this case?»

In his book «The All - or - Nothing Marriage,» Eli Finkel, a psychologist at Northwestern University and a professor at the Kellogg School of Management, made a similar argument: Modern spouses look to each other for friendship, sexual fulfillment, intellectual growth — not just financial stability, like they did in years pasIn his book «The All - or - Nothing Marriage,» Eli Finkel, a psychologist at Northwestern University and a professor at the Kellogg School of Management, made a similar argument: Modern spouses look to each other for friendship, sexual fulfillment, intellectual growth — not just financial stability, like they did in years pasin years past.

The bloated valuation has attracted short sellers, though their arguments sound a lot like those voiced in Canada three years ago.

«In my experience people who assert statements like that are often immune to evidence or rational argument, and envision themselves as superior beings who are more enlightened than the rest of us.»

In the 1800s, in Europe, the argument for the liberalization of bankruptcy law, and the introduction of limited liability, was bolstered by the increasing number of cases like John Bayer, who went bankrupt and then, later, started producing Bayer aspirin, which became a great succesIn the 1800s, in Europe, the argument for the liberalization of bankruptcy law, and the introduction of limited liability, was bolstered by the increasing number of cases like John Bayer, who went bankrupt and then, later, started producing Bayer aspirin, which became a great succesin Europe, the argument for the liberalization of bankruptcy law, and the introduction of limited liability, was bolstered by the increasing number of cases like John Bayer, who went bankrupt and then, later, started producing Bayer aspirin, which became a great success.

While I truly want to be with you on the hands - off - free - market argument, I just have to believe that these rules are in place for good reasons... like making sure your sweet Granny don't get fleeced by a huckster.

Demographics are indicating more university spaces becoming avaialble over next 8 years (already started in eastern Canada) as well as labour shortages for younger people (Foote) and generally better things ahead using same arguments by Dent.lt looks like we are headed for BOOM times which will really get going by 2020.

But Mnuchin extends that argument about transparency into something more like a rap sheet: take Beijing's money, he warns, and risk being trapped in a debilitating cycle of debt — something that has led to asset - stripping by Chinese practitioners of what the National Defense Strategy calls «predatory economics.»

The Internet Association, a D.C. - based tech lobbying group representing industry titans like Google, Amazon, and Twitter, will be filing legal arguments as an intervening party in support of the legal push to restore net neutrality, according to a report from Recode's Tony Romm.

In the midst of all the cross-currents and arguments about Fed easing, speculation about economic turnarounds and the like, our discipline focuses on what the Market Climate is, rather than what it might or should be.

Like other loopholes in gun laws, these have been in large part buttressed by the typical pro-gun argument that people should have these weapons to be able to defend themselves and their families.

Analysts who retain sympathy for the gold standard, like self - confessed «gold bug» John Mauldin, have always understood that the main argument in favor of gold is that it imposes an unbreakable trade and capital flow discipline — indeed that is also the main argument against gold — but many of them have tended to de-emphasize reserve currency economics mainly, I think, because this particular problem is to them subsumed under their more general concerns about money.

The «stock accumulation» line refers to a toehold position that Simon has accumulated in Macerich; people like to complain about toeholds these days, but I have never heard a serious argument that they might be illegal.

I am not sure that I can balance all that I like about it with the feeling of always being in an argument.

Statements like Zuckerberg's will likely be cited in arguments for expanding publisher liability.

The problem with this argument is that what is good for oil producers and exporters is inversely bad for major oil consumers and importers like the United States, Europe, and China in this zero sum game of global energy markets.

Anytime a Christian uses the «Trump is like King David» argument, I know that they have never opened a Bible in their lives.

It may lead to even more arguments, like Damon Linker's in the Week last June, «that the former FBI director is a bona fide American hero.»

In the real world, we define fallacies for debate purposes and validating arguments which is not happening here in the forums with hateful trolls like yoIn the real world, we define fallacies for debate purposes and validating arguments which is not happening here in the forums with hateful trolls like yoin the forums with hateful trolls like you.

Some, like Yoram Hazony in his» Biblical Case for Limited Government,» have even offered sophisticated (if in the end limited) arguments for why a restricted role for government is itself a Judeo - Christian value.

When we study something like theology or apologetics we delight in attending to those arguments that only count in favor of our views.

It would probably help to make you look more like a person who is literate in the English language and thus is capable of presenting a coherent argument.

What an argument, Oklahoma bomber did not do his act in the «glory of god», he never shouted AOA like all terrorist doing freely around the world specially in 9/11 and 11/26 in Mumbai.

Still, it looked like his supporters were probably in the minority, and I mentioned to him that some scientists were grousing online he was validating the creationist argument by even showing up.

When some asshat like you, just sayin, HeavenSent, Bob, etc. make blanket statements and refuse to respond to corrections, criticisms, or valid points refuting those statements, then there is no point in bringing up any kind of argument.

-LSB-...] His argument goes like this: the mind is identical with the brain, so a thought must be an event in the brain.

The argument goes something like this: when you take money from the federal government, you sell your soul to the [fill in....

Perhaps the best part of Secretary Clinton's speech was when she took on arguments against religious liberty made by authoritarians in places like Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia, Cuba, and China.

... well the same logic applys to god... i enjoy dropping these logic bombs on people and see how they react and hope that maybe that logic bomb will eventually set up a chain reaction in their consciousness... or maybe I am an egotistical f c k who just likes to have an unassaiable argument which with to beat others over the head with... maybe I am wrong to do so because the Human Condition is so cold and bleak in its finality that people need the cushion of god to go on with their everyday lives.

your immature, irrational and absolute blind remarks toward atheism have been proved that there is no rational argument beyond this point, I suggest you read my post to the fullest and absorb it's meaning, and continue to act like a civilized being, your behavior is not acceptable in any rational debate, you are not making yourself look good.

I'm just taking this argument to what seems like a ridiculous end but could, in fact, happen without laws defining «man and wife».

This is much like the argument for the Christian Trinity, it is true because god says so in the bible and the bible is true because god says so.

That's like the whole «put your faith in God and not in the flesh» argument.

I see the argument against the term «atheist,» but I don't like «non-believer,» either, because I believe in lots of things — science, truth, empathy, the power of creativity, etc — just not in anyone's god (s).

Every debate Craig has had with an atheist «philosopher» or «thinker» has looked more like a learned professor trying mightily to explain basic arguments to a freshman with ADD... you know, the kind the sits in the back and only raises their hand to drop a line they remember from last night's Jon Stewart show?

We do it every single day in the media where the main issue is ignored to promote a «talking point» that favors the authors argument or criticism with some they do nt like.

By my reading of both the human condition and our current culture, a project like Hart's is more important to the status of religion in public life than, say, arguments for a natural law.

The goal is to reverse the values of chastity, but in a situation like this, argument doesn't work.

Out of all the postings on this site today, I found «Derp's «post the most fascinating and informative, as well as deeply revealing.Even after boasting of what seems to be a practically perfect live by any measure, he informs us that he takes pleasure in mocking and ridiculing those of faith who are presumably his opposite; I can only wonder if, given all his supposed accomplishments, he is smart enough to realize how deeply revealing of his true character his remarks are.As a believer, I rarely engage in arguments with my atheist friends, and like to think I wouldn't lower myself to the level of juvenile name - calling and personal attacks against whatever my atheist friends hold dear.Most of the time we simply agree to disagree; when they hold forth with misinformation or ignorance on their assumed «knowledge «of my faith, I try to gently correct them; I certainly don't allow any disagreements we have to devolve into hateful insults and name - calling.

Indeed, I think that a cogent argument can be made for the necessity of something like the Catholic magisterium — a divinely assisted authority that has the «final say» in fundamental questions of interpretation.

Wesley did make some comments that sound like the «slippery - slide» argument of Harold Lindsell: «If there be any mistakes in the Bible, there may as well be a thousand.

To be temporal in Heidegger's sense is to have a complex unity disclosed against the background and in the pattern of unity of the three temporal horizons, past, present, and future.1 It is essential to his whole argument to realize that temporal unities are not time - like nor defined in relation to time, or to put it another way, that past, present, and future are neither «times» nor «parts of time.»

Halphen's argument runs like this: (1) by the end of the eighth century, Charlemagne had emerged as master of the West; (2) under these conditions, it was to be expected that a more general title should be added to his collection, to reflect his full power, when local conditions permitted; (3) local conditions in Rome in December, 800, demanded the intervention of an Emperor; and (4) Byzantine imperial power was at that time temporarily disrupted and incapable of intervening in Rome.