Not exact matches
Initial data from the Cassini - Huygens spacecraft, which began exploring the Saturnian system
in 2004, show that methane is indeed a minor
atmospheric constituent but a very important one, possibly playing a role analogous to that of water vapour
in Earth's troposphere.
Considering the heat capacity of the oceans is about 1,100 times greater than the air, would not even a modest change
in cloud cover affect the radiative balance with far greater magnitude than a parts - per - million change
in an
atmospheric gas
constituent?
Human activities — primarily burning of fossil fuels and changes
in land cover — are modifying the concentration of
atmospheric constituents or properties of the surface that absorb or scatter radiant energy.
When Oreskes quotes, ««Human activities... are modifying the concentrations of
atmospheric constituents... that absorb or scatter radiant energy... [M] ost of the observed warming over the last 50 years is likely to have been due to the increase
in greenhouse gas emissions», her quotation is accurate and she actually emphasizes the word likely.
Bailey, A., J. Nusbaumer, and D. Noone, 2015: Precipitation efficiency derived from isotope ratios
in water vapor distinguishes dynamical and microphysical influences on subtropical
atmospheric constituents.
i) The total exchange of radiation between Space and the TOA and between surface and the TOA is sufficiently large that an increase
in the radiative capabilities of an
atmospheric constituent that amounts to 0.04 % of the atmosphere would appear unlikely to have any significant effect.
In turn, these optical depths may be used to derive information about the column abundances of ozone and water vapor, as well as aerosol and other
atmospheric constituents.
In atmospheric physics, lidar is used as a remote detection instrument to measure densities of certain
constituents of the middle and upper atmosphere, such as potassium, sodium, or molecular nitrogen and oxygen.
In order, the most abundant greenhouse gases in Earth's atmosphere are: Non-greenhouse gases [edit] Although contributing to many other physical and chemical reactions, the major atmospheric constituents, nitrogen (N 2), oxygen (O 2), and argon (Ar), are not greenhouse gases
In order, the most abundant greenhouse gases
in Earth's atmosphere are: Non-greenhouse gases [edit] Although contributing to many other physical and chemical reactions, the major atmospheric constituents, nitrogen (N 2), oxygen (O 2), and argon (Ar), are not greenhouse gases
in Earth's atmosphere are: Non-greenhouse gases [edit] Although contributing to many other physical and chemical reactions, the major
atmospheric constituents, nitrogen (N 2), oxygen (O 2), and argon (Ar), are not greenhouse gases.)
Theoretical and Applied Climatology covers climate modeling, climatic changes and climate forecasting, micro - to mesoclimate, applied meteorology as
in agro - and forestmeteorology, biometeorology, building meteorology and
atmospheric radiation problems as they relate to the biosphere; effects of anthropogenic and natural aerosols or gaseous trace
constituents; hardware and software elements of meteorological measurements, including techniques of remote sensing, among other topics of current interest.
Of great urgency are the climate consequences of the increasing
atmospheric abundance of greenhouse gases and other trace
constituents... [that] interact strongly with the Earth's energy balance, resulting
in the prospect of significant global warming.
Radiatively, the only thing that distinguishes a «forcing» from a «feedback» is that injection of the forcing
constituent into the climate system does not depend on the
atmospheric temperature, while the feedback
constituents are temperature dependent
in response to local meteorological conditions.
And, there is plenty of empirical data at every level: There is empirical data on the basic absorption lines of the various
atmospheric constituents, there is a wealth of empirical data backing up the basic equations of radiative transfer that are applied
in calculating the greenhouse effect
in just the same way that engineers and scientists use these equations everyday
in other calculations, there is empirical spectra looking both up from the surface of the earth and down from satellites.
This effective radiating level depends on
atmospheric composition and,
in particular, on those
constituents that absorb terrestrial radiation.
If I were choosing a model to describe with as much quantitative fidelity as possible the greenhouse effect
in the earth's atmosphere, then the model I would choose would be a state - of - the - art convective - radiative transfer code using the actual composition and empirical absorption / emission lines for the
atmospheric constituents.
«Human activities (primarily burning of fossil fuels and changes
in land cover) are modifying the concentration of
atmospheric constituents or properties of the surface that absorb or scatter radiant energy.
-LSB-...]
In its most recent assessment, IPCC states unequivocally that the consensus of scientific opinion is that Earth's climate is being affected by human activities: «Human activities... are modifying the concentration of
atmospheric constituents... that absorb or scatter radiant energy.
«
In its most recent assessment, IPCC states unequivocally that the consensus of scientific opinion is that Earth's climate is being affected by human activities: «Human activities... are modifying the concentration of
atmospheric constituents... that absorb or scatter radiant energy.
Since we can not measure any individual forcing directly
in the atmosphere, the models draw upon results of laboratory experiments
in passing sunlight through chambers
in which
atmospheric constituents are artificially varied; such experiments are, however, of limited value when translated into the real atmosphere, where radiative transfers and non-radiative transports (convection and evaporation up, advection along, subsidence and precipitation down), as well as altitudinal and latitudinal asymmetries, greatly complicate the picture.