Look out for more on the latest
in attribution research as Carbon Brief reports on the Our Common Futures Under Climate Change conference taking place in Paris this week.
The upcoming report claims there has been substantial progress
in attribution research since the IPCC covered this topic extensively in 2013.
Not exact matches
«Human - induced climate change likely increased Harvey's total rainfall around Houston by at least 19 percent, with a best estimate of 37 percent,» Michael Wehner, a co-author on an
attribution study recently published
in Geophysical
Research Letters, said at the American Geophysical Union conference
in December.
The report highlights the value — and limitations — of «
attribution research,» said Thomas Karl, the director of the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)
in Asheville, North Carolina, at a press conference today.
«While the detection of greening is based on data, the
attribution to various drivers is based on models,» said co-author Josep Canadell of the Oceans and Atmosphere Division
in the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial
Research Organisation
in Canberra, Australia.
Attribution research is relatively new, and scientists are still learning how to untangle the contribution of long - term global warming
in a given weather event.
In recent years, a brand of research called «climate attribution science» has sprouted from this question, examining the impact of extreme events to determine how much — often in fractional terms — is related to human - induced climate change, and how much to natural variability (whether in climate patterns such as the El Niño / La Niña - Southern Oscillation, sea - surface temperatures, changes in incoming solar radiation, or a host of other possible factors
In recent years, a brand of
research called «climate
attribution science» has sprouted from this question, examining the impact of extreme events to determine how much — often
in fractional terms — is related to human - induced climate change, and how much to natural variability (whether in climate patterns such as the El Niño / La Niña - Southern Oscillation, sea - surface temperatures, changes in incoming solar radiation, or a host of other possible factors
in fractional terms — is related to human - induced climate change, and how much to natural variability (whether
in climate patterns such as the El Niño / La Niña - Southern Oscillation, sea - surface temperatures, changes in incoming solar radiation, or a host of other possible factors
in climate patterns such as the El Niño / La Niña - Southern Oscillation, sea - surface temperatures, changes
in incoming solar radiation, or a host of other possible factors
in incoming solar radiation, or a host of other possible factors).
This information can then be used to keep local systems up - to - date, which will result
in accurate
attribution, less time spent filling out forms, and more complete information with which to map the
research ecosystem — a benefit to everyone
in R&D.
Because these moderate extremes are by definition more common, and because the authors looked at global statistics rather than those for highly localized, rare events, the conclusions are extremely robust, said Peter Stott, leader of the Climate Monitoring and
Attribution Team at the Met Office Hadley Centre,
in the U.K. «I think this paper is very convincing,» said Stott, who was not involved
in the
research.
The new
research differs from other so - called extreme event
attribution studies, not just
in its broad - brush approach, but also
in how the term «extreme» is defined.
A new analysis published
in the journal Environmental
Research Letters establishes that seasonal forecast sea surface temperature (SSTs) can be used to perform probabilistic extreme - event
attribution, thereby accelerating the time it takes climate scientists to understand and quantify the role of global warming
in certain classes of extreme weather events.
«It's a real achievement of the scientific community,» said Noah Diffenbaugh, a Stanford University climate researcher who has conducted
attribution research but wasn't involved
in this year's BAMS issue.
* «
Attribution of Extreme Rainfall from Hurricane Harvey, August 2017» by Geert Jan van Oldenborgh et al. published
in Environmental
Research Letters on Wednesday 13 December 2017.
Eventually these unverified breed
attributions make their way to databases that are then used
in retrospective
research studies to make claims about canine behavior.
Of those incidents for which the researchers could find no breed
attributions (n = 89), Karen Delise of the National Canine
Research Council  later located breed
attributions in 40; and 37 of these cases involved dogs identified as other than Rottweiler and pit bull, a result that confirmed the researchers concerns regarding «differential ascertainment» of incidents because of breed bias.
Further evidence of this has emerged
in new
attributions made through Christie's
research before the sale of his collection on 27 September.
A collaboration with the Musée des Arts décoratifs
in Paris, this was a scholarly exhibition that displayed new
research on, and clarified
attributions to, the great 18th - century metalworker Pierre Gouthière.
«The approaches used
in detection and
attribution research described above can not fully account for all uncertainties, and thus ultimately expert judgement is required to give a calibrated assessment of whether a specific cause is responsible for a given climate change.
It's doubtful we will come to a conclusion
in real - time on the
attribution of this event — or any event — without significant
research, better tools / models, and observations.
It is true that the
attribution of recent trends
in intensity has not (yet) been made, but it is a valid subject for
research and discussion.
While the basics of global warming science are now firmly established, climatologists immersed
in «
attribution»
research, investigating the mix of factors shaping a particular heat wave, deluge or drought, are still arguing long and hard about whether there is a discernible contribution from human - driven warming.
I have NO IDEA where either of these students stands on the issue of
attribution of global warming (note the complexities of
attribution are nicely summarized
in a current post over at RC); none of us conducts specific
research in that area and that is not what we talk about.
The
research proposals that i write and review are about addressing some uncertainty or other, i have no idea where the proposer stands on the
attribution of global warming, it simply doesn't come up
in the proposal process at least for the grant proposals that I review).
For the entire Northern Hemisphere, there is evidence of an increase
in both storm frequency and intensity during the cold season since 1950,1 with storm tracks having shifted slightly towards the poles.2, 3 Extremely heavy snowstorms increased
in number during the last century
in northern and eastern parts of the United States, but have been less frequent since 2000.11,15 Total seasonal snowfall has generally decreased
in southern and some western areas, 16 increased
in the northern Great Plains and Great Lakes region, 16,17 and not changed
in other areas, such as the Sierra Nevada, although snow is melting earlier
in the year and more precipitation is falling as rain versus snow.18 Very snowy winters have generally been decreasing
in frequency
in most regions over the last 10 to 20 years, although the Northeast has been seeing a normal number of such winters.19 Heavier - than - normal snowfalls recently observed
in the Midwest and Northeast U.S.
in some years, with little snow
in other years, are consistent with indications of increased blocking (a large scale pressure pattern with little or no movement) of the wintertime circulation of the Northern Hemisphere.5 However, conclusions about trends
in blocking have been found to depend on the method of analysis, 6 so the assessment and
attribution of trends
in blocking remains an active
research area.
Current work1 has provided evidence of the increase
in frequency and intensity of winter storms, with the storm tracks shifting poleward, 2,3 but some areas have experienced a decrease
in winter storm frequency.4 Although there are some indications of increased blocking (a large - scale pressure pattern with little or no movement) of the wintertime circulation of the Northern Hemisphere, 5 the assessment and
attribution of trends
in blocking remain an active
research area.6 Some recent
research has provided insight into the connection of global warming to tornadoes and severe thunderstorms.7, 8
In the second talk, Dr Geert Jan van Oldenborgh, from the Royal National Meteorological Institute (KNMI, The Netherlands), gave the talk with the title «Event
attribution: from
research to climate service».
The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) is organizing,
in collaboration with the World Climate
Research Programme (WCRP), a Summer School on
Attribution and Prediction of Extreme Events, to be held at ICTP, Trieste (Italy).
To provide members of the public with the opportunity to contribute directly to
research on climate change
in a vulnerable region and demonstrate the power of an evidence - based approach to climate impact
attribution.
I would appeal to those who influence future funding to redress the balance of academic
research toward greater understanding, and thus
attribution, of natural controls, for
in the last analysis, it is they that have the greater power and threat.
But this is an approach that many
attribution scientists have considered and rejected, says Dr Friederike Otto, a senior
research at the University of Oxford, who also wasn't involved
in the study:
E. P. Maurer et al., Detection,
attribution, and sensitivity of trends toward earlier streamflow
in the Sierra Nevada, Journal of Geophysical
Research, vol.
Interesting that they state: Peter Stott, Head of Climate
Attribution at the Met Office, said: «Our
research shows current global average temperatures are highly unlikely
in a world without human influence on the climate.
It consisted of two talks: «Communicating uncertainty
in climate information: insights from the behavioural sciences», by Andrea Taylor, University of Leeds (UK) «Event
attribution: from
research to climate service», by Geert Jan van Oldenborgh, Royal National Meteorological Institute - KNMI (The Netherlands)
Although the science of event
attribution has developed rapidly
in recent years, geographical coverage of events remains patchy and based on the interests and capabilities of individual
research groups.
After all, there's no reason for most climate
research to say «humans are causing > 50 % of global warming» (except
attribution research), especially
in the abstract.»
In addition, several international research programs came together to develop the World Weather Attribution project to analyze the role of climate change in extreme event
In addition, several international
research programs came together to develop the World Weather
Attribution project to analyze the role of climate change
in extreme event
in extreme events.
Proponents of AGW, such of yourself, who argue that these issues do not exist, will likely have little role
in designing the
attribution research program.
We are also collaborating with other
research groups who are interested
in using our simulations to perform similar
attribution studies, for snowmelt
in western North America, and heatwaves
in South Africa and India.
Her main
research interest is the quantification of uncertainty and validation of climate models,
in particular with respect to extreme events,
in order to undertake
attribution studies of extreme weather events to external climate drivers.
In one instance in an October 2002 draft of a regularly published summary of government climate research, «Our Changing Planet,» Mr. Cooney amplified the sense of uncertainty by adding the word «extremely» to this sentence: «The attribution of the causes of biological and ecological changes to climate change or variability is extremely difficult.&raqu
In one instance
in an October 2002 draft of a regularly published summary of government climate research, «Our Changing Planet,» Mr. Cooney amplified the sense of uncertainty by adding the word «extremely» to this sentence: «The attribution of the causes of biological and ecological changes to climate change or variability is extremely difficult.&raqu
in an October 2002 draft of a regularly published summary of government climate
research, «Our Changing Planet,» Mr. Cooney amplified the sense of uncertainty by adding the word «extremely» to this sentence: «The
attribution of the causes of biological and ecological changes to climate change or variability is extremely difficult.»
As such, I would say: more time spent on
research could easily indicate less time spent on being careful
in regards to
attribution.
Posted by Olive Heffernan Categories:
Attribution, Biodiversity and Ecology,
In the News, Olive Heffernan,
Research
«The approaches used
in detection and
attribution research described above can not fully account for all uncertainties, and thus ultimately expert judgment is required to give a calibrated assessment of whether a specific cause is responsible for a given climate change.
American analyst Dr David Wojick warns of a new term
in pseudoscience:
attribution research.
Besides the more traditional duties expected of an
in - house lawyer and corporate secretary, Shull's appointment has also seen him jump head - first into CIGI's Global Security Program, contributing
research that explores the legality of cyber espionage and the rules of
attribution and state responsibility for offensive cyber activities.
Decreasing negative
attributions surrounding intimacy may improve overall relationship satisfaction, according to
research published
in the «Journal of Marital and Family Therapy.»
This is an open - access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction
in any medium, provided the original work, first published
in the Journal of Medical Internet
Research, is properly cited.
Future
research investigating associations between staff - patient relationships, staff
attributions, and burnout is particularly important
in informing the development of interventions to improve relationships.
Consistent with findings
in familial
research, staff
attributions may play a key role
in driving critical responses, and it may be possible to reduce staff high EE by modifying negative appraisals.
In keeping with past research (Hains et al., 2006), negative attributions of friend reactions had a direct effect on anticipated adherence difficulties, which had a direct effect on diabetes stress, which in turn had a direct effect on metabolic contro
In keeping with past
research (Hains et al., 2006), negative
attributions of friend reactions had a direct effect on anticipated adherence difficulties, which had a direct effect on diabetes stress, which
in turn had a direct effect on metabolic contro
in turn had a direct effect on metabolic control.