Not exact matches
I hope you realize anything that is
quoted «Spoken by Jesus» is questionable at best as
in the academic world (
Biblical scholars) most of what was written by anonymous scribe 200 - 300 years after the event are consider Pseudepigraphic and if nescessary I can supply historical reference.
The convictionâ $» endemic among churchfolkâ $» persists that, if problems of misapprehension and misrepresentation are overcome and the gospel can be heard
in its own integrity, the gospel will be found attractive by people, become popular, and, even, be a success of some sortâ $ ¦ This idea is both curious and ironical because it is bluntly contradicted
in Scripture and
in the experience of the continuing
biblical witness
in history from the event of Pentecost unto the present momentâ $ (William Stringfellow,
quoted in A Keeper of the Word, p. 348).
At many points Wesley sounds like a son of the Reformation
in his emphasis on the finality of
biblical authority and
in his desire to be,
in the much
quoted phrase, a homo unius libri (a «man of one book»).
Here's a
biblical quote where jesus says we should follow the OT: Jesus orders Christians to follow the Law of Moses
in the Old Testament: «Do not think that I [Jesus] have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.
If someone curses
in anguish and asks for prayer and shares a
biblical quote, and does it
in their pajamas, via internet, is that... worship?
Obama went on to frame decisions as disparate as ending tax breaks for the wealthy and defending foreign aid as examples of
biblical principles
in action,
quoting Jesus» teaching that «for unto whom much is given, much shall be required» and invoking the «
biblical call to care for the least of these.»
(And rendering only a partial
quote is much like
biblical proof texting
in my opinion) I am kind of a stickler on such details, as a sloppy portrayal of another's words often leads to inaccurate representation of their intent.
Berry's essays are peppered with
biblical references and
quotes, and his stories are drenched
in the Bible.
In fact, in an extended section justifying violence in the name of self - defense (plagiarized, like much in the manifesto, from other websites), it quotes from Exodus, Samuel, Judges, Psalms, Luke, Matthew, Isaiah, Daniel, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians and other biblical book
In fact,
in an extended section justifying violence in the name of self - defense (plagiarized, like much in the manifesto, from other websites), it quotes from Exodus, Samuel, Judges, Psalms, Luke, Matthew, Isaiah, Daniel, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians and other biblical book
in an extended section justifying violence
in the name of self - defense (plagiarized, like much in the manifesto, from other websites), it quotes from Exodus, Samuel, Judges, Psalms, Luke, Matthew, Isaiah, Daniel, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians and other biblical book
in the name of self - defense (plagiarized, like much
in the manifesto, from other websites), it quotes from Exodus, Samuel, Judges, Psalms, Luke, Matthew, Isaiah, Daniel, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians and other biblical book
in the manifesto, from other websites), it
quotes from Exodus, Samuel, Judges, Psalms, Luke, Matthew, Isaiah, Daniel, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians and other
biblical books.
Such immersion
in the
biblical world and its language leads to much richer interpretation than either
quoting proof texts or picking and choosing passages we like.
It is inconceivable to me that Paul can be
quoted by modern male chauvinists as the
biblical authority for excluding women from accepting God's call to serve others
in the name of Christ, when Paul himself encouraged and congratulated inspired women who were prominent — to use his own descriptions — as deacons, apostles, ministers and saints.
I'm talking to these Christians posting
biblical texts all over here, they love to
quote the first 4 gospels and pretend their religion is soft and cuddly, when
in reality it's just as dangerous as any of the other religions.
On page 254, I
quote again from Recovering
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood to share what John Piper and Wayne Grudem say there about women teaching and leading
in the church.
On page 22, I
quote Dorothy Patterson's statement
in Recovering
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood that «keeping the home is God's assignment to the wife — even down to changing the sheets, doing the laundry, and scrubbing the floors.»
Quoted in Thomas Boomershine, Jr.,
Biblical Storytelling.
For example, it is the opinion of not a few
biblical scholars that the love commandments
in the Fourth Gospel and the epistles of John, so often
quoted to stress the universality of the Christian ethic, were originally understood as applying only within the Christian community, and as
in the Old Testament «Love your neighbor» meant «Love your fellow Israelite,» so the corresponding «new commandment» was taken to mean, «Love your fellow Christian.
Anything with
Biblical or Quranic
quotes — not interested
in debates over superstitious orthodoxy.
If you believe
in Biblical literacy and the infallibility of the Bible's writers, then those passages you
quote and many others
in the N.T. are indeed hard to understand, even after two thousand years of examination and discussion — at least without developing some fantastic theology that goes completely against God and nature.
Dale Vree came back
in the New Oxford Review with an article titled «If Everyone Is Saved...,» defending Regis Scanlon and rejecting Neuhaus» exegesis of the
biblical texts he had
quoted.
I find it ironic that you
quote an organization that is dedicated to investigating
Biblical questions, Answers
In Genesis and then say that there is no evidence for creationism And they do look at the same evidence, science.
The comment
in quotes is by Shawn Kelley from an article entitled «Poststructuralism and / or Afrocentrism,»
in Eugene H. Lovering, Jr., ed., Society of
Biblical Literature: 1995 Seminar Papers (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1995), p. 243.
The difference between the
Biblical and non-
Biblical conceptions of myth is indeed implicitly recognized by HBK, for it
quotes Alfred Jeremias's definition of
Biblical myth: «Myth
in the narrower sense... is one of the supreme creations of the human spirit.
To
quote Kenyan feminist theologian Musimbi Kanyoro, «Those cultures which are far removed from
biblical culture risk reading the Bible as fiction,» Conversely, societies that identify with the
biblical world feel at home
in the text.
There were other issues too: The way the accounts of Israel's monarchy contradicted one another, the way Jesus and Paul
quoted Hebrew Scripture
in ways that seemed to stretch the original meaning, the fact that women were considered property
in Levitical Law, the way both science and archeology challenged the historicity of so many
biblical texts, and the fact that it was nearly impossible for me to write a creative retelling of Resurrection Day because each of the gospel writers tell the story so differently, sometimes with contradictory details.
In The Art of
Biblical Narrative, Robert Alter suggests a key to characters» inner thoughts and motivations which would be helpful even to the inexperienced reader of Scripture: first, external details (appearance, clothing, gestures); second, «one character's comments on another»; third, «direct speech by the character»; fourth, «inward speech...
quoted as interior monologue»; and fifth, «statements by the narrator about the attitudes and intentions of the personages» (pp.116 - 117).
7 H. S. Nyberg, Studien zum Hoseabuche (1935), p. 8; as
quoted by Eduard Nielsen, Oral Tradition (Toronto: Ryerson Press, 1954)(No. 11
in the series Studies
in Biblical Theology), p. 39.
I don't respond well to threats, so I will respond with one of my favorite
Biblical quotes: Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, because I am the meanest son of a bi-tch
in the valley.
The Navarre Bible, that wonderful commentary which has done so much to seed the wasteland of contemporary
Biblical scholarship, refers
in connection with the passage I
quoted from Matthew (9:36) to words of St Margaret Mary Alacoque: «This Divine Heart is a great abyss which holds all good, and he commands that all his poor people should pour their needs into it.
Why anyone would think Hitler was a person that should be
quoted in any sort of positive way to support - or - contrast
Biblical teachings for parents and children is beyond me.
But Christians compare and contrast a
Biblical truth (how one brings up a child) with a
quote from an evil man who brainwashed millions
in Germany to follow an evil path of destruction and we are doing something evil.
«Rational Libertarian,» I find it interesting that you
quote a deeply devout Roman Catholic author
in an attempt to mock a
Biblical quotation.
If the
quote was made
in isolation with no
biblical contrast then people would have a legitimate point.
For example, the Bible is frequently
quoted in support of opposition to portrayals of sex and violence
in the media but not often to challenge the practice of western media corporations destroying poorer indigenous cultures by selling cheap western entertainment that under - cuts local programming, even though protection of the poor is a strong
biblical message.
For every
biblical quote thrown around I have others to prove my point
in support of my church but one of my favorite sayings is «never try and teach a pig to sing - it wastes your time and annoys the pig.»
It may mean printing the text and pointing out specific verses or
quoting them with sufficient frequency that it becomes clear that these verses are present, that the ways
in which the passage was remembered — the past interpretations brought to the present hearing — have overlooked these verses, that these are not the creation of the preacher but are the
biblical text.
The definition «you» provided of being Christian is not
quoted in Biblical text.
A NEW dating agency for Christians is asking members to
quote eating favourite
Biblical passages and describe their religious beliefs
in order to ensure that christian dating agency uk are matched with their perfect partner.
Ignore the
Biblical passage
quoted in Terrence Malick's impressionistic, nearly dialogue - free indulgence «To the Wonder.»
Finally, a worksheet for pupils to fill
in based on research they will do on 3 major aspects of his life - birth, teachings, death and a section to fill
in on any
Biblical quotes they may find interesting
in relation to this task.
It examines
in detail the arguments of certain religious leaders against homosexuality: the faulty logic, the quotation of scriptures out of their historical context, the convenient interpretation of
biblical quotes, the power of charismatic preachers.
The approximately 6 % rise
in «Evolution, but God guided»
in the second form of the questionaire relative to the form
quoted above probably represents a shift of those whose interpretation of «exactly as the Bible describes» allows them to consider creation prior to 10,000 years ago as consistent with the
Biblical creation accounts.