Sentences with phrase «in blatant fraud»
If it is notarized, the third - party notary as well as one of the parties has to be engaged in blatant fraud, and it is likely that an arbitrator or court would not believe that this happened.
https://law.stackexchange.com/ Not exact matches
How can we take seriously the daily hand - wringing about fraud, non-replication, and biased statistics when in so blatant a case of data manipulation (where flawed predictors were the basis for surgery and chemotherapy regimens) we read: «Respondent neither admits nor denies ORI's findings of research misconduct»?
This recent post via Real Climate Science on NASA tampering of Sea - level rise highlights the blatant malfeasance that these government funded institutions will undertake in order to push the man - made global warming climate change agenda, and keep the «Greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud in history» rolling and the billions upon billions of taxpayer funds flowing...
Apart from the blatant bias against any questioning and skepticism against the IPCC position (that moderator was clearly on «mission mode»), it's interesting on how in one instance, the Hockey Stick is discussed, and further on, Roy Spencer blatantly accuses it to be a fraud.
A beleaguered federal agency appears to be implicated in the most blatant and extreme case of climate data fraud yet seen.
The criminal aspect is not only the failure of the alarmsits to observe these basic facts bu the Hockeystick fraud giving hundreds of times the weighting to faulty Bristlecone pine proxy data as to other sets in order to give a desired result, the blatant tampering of Data to warm the past with extremely dubious reasons, the NZ NWA scandal where they demonstrably altered data to fit the alarmist agenda, the Darwin Australia tampering, the crude attempt to prove a «hotspot» by making the base temperature representation red and thus appear hot in a now debunked graph etc Then there's the Nazi / Stalin / Lenin / Maoesque attempts to silence debate.
It's definitely not the conservatives, not the Republicans, not the Tea Partiers nor the libertarians that have brought the science community into such disrepute with the blatant global warming fraud uncovered in Climategate.
«Once again, the IPCC is engaging in blatant scientific fraud.
If Dr. Lennart Bengtsson has felt persecuted for joining a «registered educational charity» — for Pete's sake, can no one detect TAX FRAUD when it is so blatant in the UK?!
The part in the US could be legitimate or not, but the part with the EU definitely is very smelly and appears to be a blatant attempt to silence people who think anthropogenic climate change is a gigantic fraud.