Such dramatic effects on brain size and function are unlikely in human carriers of BRCA1 mutations, the authors of the study note, but they propose the findings could shed light on the gene's role
in brain evolution.
Not exact matches
We don't know how it is grounded
in brain activity, nor whether it is an emergent capacity of the
evolution of organisms at all, so we can't possibly know whether it is bound to emerge from the
evolution of other physical systems.
A modern banana, an ant, a bumble bee, a monkey (the ones you think we came from), and the human
brain (among a million other things created) disprove the theory of
evolution in just one sentence worth of their description.
Or perhaps it is actually something
evolution put
in our
brains to be able to perceive an actual «something» that exists.
It was claimed that the mind which meditates the concept of
evolution profoundly will find that nothing is left uncounted for... This can be done, the nervous system organised into the
brain, the functions of the glands, the influence of the subconscious mind etc., all this and anything else one cares to add
in qualification can take over the role of the so - called «spiritual
in the personality of man.
your
brain is relatvely soo simple and therefore its comprehension is also very limited, you believe
in evolution so religion itself is an evolutionary process.Even atheism also evolved, The arguments today is just part of the evolutionary process of change through dialectecal methods.The moment humans begin to understand and appreciate the dialectics then the solution to the problems argued is near.
The authors discuss the
evolution of the human
brain, the importance of language, and compare human intelligence to that found
in other animals.
consciousness is present
in all matter, just like gravity it is inherent and innate to everything produced after the big bang, only its level of existence varies with
evolution, highest is that of living things, at the top is us humans because of the biological nature of our existence we evolve fastest and our
brains has attained the highest level of complexity
The proof that the growing co-extension of our soul and the world, through the consciousness of our relationship with all things, is not simply a matter of logic or idealisation, but is part of an organic process, the natural outcome of the impulse which caused the germination of life and the growth of the
brain — the proof is that it expresses itself
in a specific
evolution of the moral value of our actions (that is to say, by the modification of what is most living within us).
What I find disappointing is that grown adults can see that after centuries of
evolution,
in which we have grown taller on the average, our
brains have enlarged, and technology has altered our everyday way of life... can sit back and say stupid stuff like that.
Evolution is not good for our children - it teaches them that they are no more than monkey -
brains, when
in truth, each one was lovingly constructed by a God Who needs each individual for HIS purpose, not yours.
The key to human nature therefore lies
in both the organic inheritance of
evolution through the
brain, which is instinct with natural law, harmonic order and finely tuned mutual balance, and
in the free, dynamic seeking of truth and values and their free administration by the directly created spirit.
[14] Nonetheless he thinks that the rational soul began to be when the
brain reached a certain «degree
in complexity» (through
evolution).
And because the underlying commitment is philosophical, the flimsiest facts are counted as evidence - as when the president of the National Academy of Sciences recently published an article arguing that
evolution is confirmed by differences
in the size of finch beaks, as though the sprawling evolutionary drama from biochemicals to the human
brain could rest on instances of trivial, limited variation.
While it is evident to science that there is a functional «teleonomy» or machine - like purposiveness
in individual organisms (for example, the fish's eye is constructed so as to enable it to see under water, the heart toward pumping blood, the human
brain toward problem - solving, etc.), still there is no hard evidence that life itself, terrestrial
evolution or the universe as a whole has any overarching meaning.
The accounts of
evolution «from the Big Bang to the Big
Brain» are essentially narrative
in form.
For this reason I have realized this: a chimpanzee does not understand math (regardless of how many hours I spent trying to teach them this) because of it's anatomy, yet I do understand math because of my anatomy (and education of course), I as a mere mortal (unlike yourself) know that my faculties must be somehow limited and that there are concepts that no matter how much I try to use my retarded
brain I will never understand them because I don't have the god lobe
in the ole
brain like you do, none the less I keep on thinkin»
in a finite fashion hoping that my future children might have a little more range than I since they too will be a «tarded snapshot
in a timeline of cognitive
evolution.
Along with dualistic mythology several developments
in scientific thought since the seventeenth century have contributed to the exorcism of mind from nature: first, there is the cosmography of classical (Newtonian) physics picturing our world as composed of inanimate, unconscious bits of «matter» needing only the brute laws of inertia to explain their action; second, the Darwinian theory of
evolution with its emphasis on chance, waste and the apparent «impersonality» of natural selection; third, the laws of thermodynamics (and particularly the second law) with the allied cosmological interpretation that our universe is running out of energy available to sustain life,
evolution and human consciousness; fourth, the geological and astronomical disclosure of enormous tracts of apparently lifeless space and matter
in the universe; fifth, the recent suggestions that life may be reducible to an inanimate chemical basis; and, finally, perhaps most shocking of all, the suspicion that mind may be explained exhaustively
in terms of mindless
brain chemistry.
Dr. J. A. Hadfield, one of the most distinguished psychologists of my generation,
in an essay on The Mind and the
Brain argues on a scientific basis «that
in the course of
evolution the mind shows an ever - increasing tendency to free itself from physical control and, breaking loose from its bonds, to assert its independence and live a life undetermined except by the laws of its own nature.»
In the synthesis of philosophy and science presented by Faith, the
evolution of the human
brain at a critical juncture, the first homo sapiens, requires an external principle of control, one not determined by material forces, but controlling and directing them.
a It seems
in the first place that, anatomically, a gradual
evolution of the
brain can be discerned during the earliest phases of our phylogenesis.
At the summit of material animal
evolution is a proto - human, but the next stage of complexity
in brain function would be out of kilter with the natural environment since it is now too powerful to be subject to the ULCD from the material environment alone.
By summing up this spontaneity (making its successive moments simultaneous) sufficient energy could be accumulated and released to influence the «hair - trigger» behavioral mechanisms of the
brain.23 A similar explanation is available to Bergson to account for the manner
in which the vital impetus could influence
evolution,
Millions and millions of years of
evolution have made sure that the human
brain has safeguards built
in, just so it can't conjure something like this on short notice.
However,
in an election being dominated by an air - headed racist with a history with bankruptcy, a
brain surgeon who doesn't believe
in evolution, and a female CEO (who was fired from the job) who hates women's rights, someone like George Pataki doesn't necessarily look like a bad choice, either.
BRAINY CHIMPS Some modern chimps have
brain surface features that were thought to have signaled humanlike
brain evolution in hominids from as early as 3 million years ago, scans suggest.
In a study published on Nov. 16, scientists discovered that human
brains exhibit more plasticity, propensity to be modeled by the environment, than chimpanzee
brains and that this may have accounted for part of human
evolution.
«We've known other people who have looked at genes involved
in brain size
evolution, tested them out and done the same kinds of experiments we've done and come up dry.»
While Schwartz believes
in evolution, he says that the mechanism of neuroplasticity, which changes the shape of our
brains, has likely shaped human
evolution, too.
The FOXP2 gene is thought to have played a role
in the
evolution of the human
brain and the development of language.
It turns out the
evolution of our complex
brain has come at a price: Sometimes we end up with a mental traffic jam
in there.
Researchers hypothesize that the technological leap was driven by a cognitive leap, an
evolution in brain wiring.
In this sense, Damasio's career mirrors the
evolution of the
brain sciences, which no longer focus exclusively on the microscopic tanglings of neurons and have made steady inroads into a number of fields like economics, sociology, literary theory, and political science.
Understanding how and why we evolved such large
brains is one of the most puzzling issues
in the study of human
evolution.
The
evolution of the human
brain is one of the most important questions
in the story of our origins.
«Paleo diet: Big
brains needed carbs: Importance of dietary carbohydrate
in human
evolution.»
«Maybe the invention of this new type of stem cell was important
in driving
brain evolution,» says Mueller.
«This connection between an innate call and the activity of a
brain area important to learned vocalisations suggests that during the
evolution of songbirds, the role of the song area
in the
brain changed from being a simple vocalisation system for innate calls to a specialised neural network for learned songs,» concludes Manfred Gahr, coordinator of the study.
It underscores the importance of developing large
brains in early human
evolution, Simpson says.
Further studies of casts of the inner braincase, which show impressions from surface features of the
brain, may help clarify N. alesi's position
in ape
evolution, Nengo says.
This relationship between unlearned calls and an area of the
brain responsible for learned vocalisations is important for understanding the
evolution of song learning
in songbirds.
Among other uses, oVert will «open new doors» for understanding
brain evolution in hard - to - find species, predicts Kara Yopak of the University of North Carolina
in Wilmington, the neuroanatomy adviser to the project.
If our results are confirmed
in future studies, it would be a unique demonstration of convergent
evolution of intelligence, involving the same neurotransmitter receptors despite the widely different
brain structures of birds and mammals.»
Describing himself as a «neuro - ethologist,» Brockmann hopes that the comparative studies on three species native to India — A. cerana, A. dorsata, and A. florea — will help him understand the
evolution of dance communication and identify the changes
in the
brain that accompanied the changes
in behavior.
The speculation,
in an article on the
evolution of our
brains, that a dinosaur or bird could have evolved considerable...
We know from comparative studies
in primates that this part of the
brain became highly specialized during hominin
evolution.
Experts have long suspected that complex social interaction drove the
evolution of large
brains in humans.
«I was expecting to find that a few genes would be evolving rapidly, while probably the overall distribution would be changing at about the same rate among all the primates, but instead we saw that the
brain's gene
evolution in the human lineage has actually slowed down,» Wu says.
«This is a helpful first step that builds off of other important previous work and is a natural step
in the
evolution of our understanding of fibromyalgia as a
brain disorder» said López - Solà.
Thus they may have played roles
in the
evolution of humans» large
brains and speech.