Sentences with phrase «in breach of court orders»

Counsel to Federal Government, Mr Shuaibu Labaran who declined to confirm or deny the presence of the security operatives in the house of Dasuki, in breach of the court order, however admitted that the former NSA was being investigated in another money laundering matter.

Not exact matches

In some cases it has to remove content because of a court order, but in other cases it will remove even relatively inoffensive images and posts — such as pictures of women breast - feeding their children, for example — because it breaches the site's community standards, or because someone complains about the contenIn some cases it has to remove content because of a court order, but in other cases it will remove even relatively inoffensive images and posts — such as pictures of women breast - feeding their children, for example — because it breaches the site's community standards, or because someone complains about the contenin other cases it will remove even relatively inoffensive images and posts — such as pictures of women breast - feeding their children, for example — because it breaches the site's community standards, or because someone complains about the content.

Two additional stockholder derivative lawsuits, Pifko v. Babbio, et al., filed on September 19, 2006, and Gross v. Babbio, et al., filed on November 21, 2006, were filed in Chancery Court, County of New Castle, Delaware; both seek to recover damages for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and to obtain an order instructing the defendants to refrain from further breaches of fiduciary duty and to implement corrective measures that will prevent future occurrences of the alleged breaches of fiduciary duty.

- Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages containing material that is obscene, racist, homophobic or sexist or that contains any form of hate speech; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that infringe copyright; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that are illegal, libellous, defamatory or may prejudice ongoing legal proceedings or breach a court injunction or other order; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that are abusive, threatening or make any form of personal attack on another user or an employee of Packaging Europe magazine; - Post Messages in any language other than English; - Post the same Message, or a very similar Message, repeatedly; - Post or otherwise publish any Messages unrelated to the Forum or the Forum's topic; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages containing any form of advertising or promotion for goods and services or any chain Messages or «spam»; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages with recommendations to buy or refrain from buying a particular security or which contain confidential information of another party or which otherwise have the purpose of affecting the price or value of any security; - Disguise the origin of any Messages; - Impersonate any person or entity (including Packaging Europe magazine employees or Forum guests or hosts) or misrepresent any affiliation with any person or entity; - Post or transmit any Messages that contain software viruses, files or code designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of the Site or any computer software or equipment, or any other harmful component; - Collect or store other users» personal data; and / or - Restrict or inhibit any other user from using the Forums.

«The failure of lNEC to conduct the re-run elections in Rivers within the time - frame ordered by the respective election petition tribunals / courts is in breach of the Electoral Act and Section 76 of the 1999 Constitution, thus endangering the nation's democracy.

He held that the lower court was in grievous error when it ordered the publication of Ibrahim's name pointing out that the decision of the high court was in total breach of the provision of section 36 of the 1999 constitution, which it said forbade any court from denying fair hearing to a party likely to be affected by final decision of the court.

In order to get into federal court, you either need (1) a federal cause of action (there isn't one here; breach of contract is a state claim), or (2) «diversity of citizenship» + an amount in controversy over $ 75,00In order to get into federal court, you either need (1) a federal cause of action (there isn't one here; breach of contract is a state claim), or (2) «diversity of citizenship» + an amount in controversy over $ 75,00in controversy over $ 75,000.

On February 5, 2009, the landlord of our premises located at 349 Oyster Point Boulevard, South San Francisco, California filed a complaint against us in the Superior Court of California for the County of San Mateo alleging breach of contract and termination of our lease, seeking a writ of attachment and a temporary protective order, for which a hearing was held on February 6, 2009.

The court may order a delay pending the outcome of a criminal investigation, or a breach of your duties as specified in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, or due to a prior bankruptcy.

However, London's reign as arbitration capital may be under threat after last week's European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling in West Tankers that it was inconsistent with EC reg 44/2001 (the successor of the Brussels Convention) for a court of a European member state to make an order (commonly known as an anti-suit injunction) to restrain a person from commencing or continuing proceedings in another member state on the ground that such proceedings are in breach of an arbitration agreeCourt of Justice (ECJ) ruling in West Tankers that it was inconsistent with EC reg 44/2001 (the successor of the Brussels Convention) for a court of a European member state to make an order (commonly known as an anti-suit injunction) to restrain a person from commencing or continuing proceedings in another member state on the ground that such proceedings are in breach of an arbitration agreecourt of a European member state to make an order (commonly known as an anti-suit injunction) to restrain a person from commencing or continuing proceedings in another member state on the ground that such proceedings are in breach of an arbitration agreement.

[We will fully co-operate with any law enforcement authorities or court order requiring us to disclose the identity or other details of any person posting material to this website in breach of Paragraph 1.8.]

The borrowers argued that this was a breach of Art 1 of the First Protocol of the European Convention on Human Rights, and that in order to be compatible with the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998), s 36 AJA 1970 should be construed by the court to include applications made by a purchaser, as well as a lender.

Under s 63 of the Magistrates» Court Act 1980 the court can consider imposing a fine or a custodial sentence for any breach of a contact order that may be proved in committal or family proceedCourt Act 1980 the court can consider imposing a fine or a custodial sentence for any breach of a contact order that may be proved in committal or family proceedcourt can consider imposing a fine or a custodial sentence for any breach of a contact order that may be proved in committal or family proceedings.

The 2014 case of H - R (Children)[2014] EWCC B80 (Fam)(11 April 2014) illustrates that even when faced with a mother who had repeatedly breached a contact order and then failed to attend court on three occasions in connection with enforcement hearings the court can be reluctant to go as far as imposing a custodial sentence.

In B v S [2009] All ER D119 (Dec) the court had to consider whether committing the mother of a three month old child to prison following persistent breaches of a contact order would infringe her child's right to a private and family life (under Art 8 of the Human Rights Convention).

Duncan Lewis have experience in all aspects of judicial review claimant work, including obtaining emergency orders and other interim relief to prevent breaches of human rights, following up judicial reviews with actions for damages in both the County and High Court and successfully pursuing judicial review matters to the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.

That act, referred to in this article as the «Implementing Act» states that, «A person whose rights of custody with respect to a child are breached due to removal to or retention in Japan may file a petition against the person who takes care of the child with a Family Court to seek an order to return the child to the state of habitual residence pursuant to the provisions of this Act.»

For example, in Khrapunov v JSC BTA Bank the English Court of Appeal confirmed that an individual in Switzerland who participated in breaches of a worldwide freezing order was susceptible to a claim for unlawful means conspiracy — notwithstanding that he was outside the jurisdiction of the English court (and therefore not bound by the freezing order or susceptible to an order finding him in contempt) and that the actions he took (moving monies on instructions from their owner) were otherwise laCourt of Appeal confirmed that an individual in Switzerland who participated in breaches of a worldwide freezing order was susceptible to a claim for unlawful means conspiracy — notwithstanding that he was outside the jurisdiction of the English court (and therefore not bound by the freezing order or susceptible to an order finding him in contempt) and that the actions he took (moving monies on instructions from their owner) were otherwise lacourt (and therefore not bound by the freezing order or susceptible to an order finding him in contempt) and that the actions he took (moving monies on instructions from their owner) were otherwise lawful.

There were 11 allegations which included that he circumvented the terms of a British Columbia Supreme Court order and attempted to mislead the court; he breached his ethical obligations by receiving funds from an individual and disbursing them for the benefit of a client without advising the individual that his interests were not being protected; and he represented parties in a B.C. Supreme Court action despite a conflict of inteCourt order and attempted to mislead the court; he breached his ethical obligations by receiving funds from an individual and disbursing them for the benefit of a client without advising the individual that his interests were not being protected; and he represented parties in a B.C. Supreme Court action despite a conflict of intecourt; he breached his ethical obligations by receiving funds from an individual and disbursing them for the benefit of a client without advising the individual that his interests were not being protected; and he represented parties in a B.C. Supreme Court action despite a conflict of inteCourt action despite a conflict of interest.

The CJC says there is growing concern about the way such injunctions are being sought and / or used; the powers afforded to the courts (principally the county court, although the youth court can grant civil injunctions against juveniles); the limited powers available to the county court on breach; whether third parties should be involved in the process, and whether breaches of these orders are then a shortcut to mandatory possession orders.

In a minority of U.S. states it isn't automatically unlawful to evict someone for non-payment of rent or the termination of a lease term without a court order, if it can be accomplished without a breach of the peace.

The defendant therefore asked the court to order the disclosure of the plaintiffs» medical records in order to prove that the breach had caused them distress.

Further if the carrying out of this order has been in breach of the terms of this order or otherwise in a manner inconsistent with the Applicant's solicitors» duties as officers of the court, the Applicant will comply with any order for damages the Court may make.&rcourt, the Applicant will comply with any order for damages the Court may make.&rCourt may make.»

«Is it consistent with EC Regulation 44/2001 [the EC Regulation] for a court of a member state to make an order to restrain a person from commencing or continuing proceedings in another member state on the ground that such proceedings are in breach of an arbitration agreement?»

Lilly did not owe Apotex an equitable duty, nor is this case akin to the «exceptional» breach of contract cases where courts award restitution damages to a plaintiff in order to prevent a defendant from exploiting a bilateral agreement to its advantage.

We also wish to make clear that the Judge did not find that the Commission had in fact been in breach either of the principle of sincere cooperation, or of the Court's previous order.

The husband unsuccessfully tried to pay up the arrears of support at the last minute but the court was unimpressed and ordered him to pay more as he had breached the deal and deprived the wife of what she had bargained for in the original Vancouver separation agreement.

Representation of minority shareholders in home healthcare franchising companies in various state court litigation involving breach of fiduciary duty, breach of a shareholders» agreement, fraud and other tort claims, including successfully prosecuting charges for violation of court orders freezing millions of corporate funds, resulting in a civil contempt judgment that included a jail sentence.

In Decadent the relevant breach which triggered the operation of CPR r 3.9 was the claimant's failure to comply with an unless order relating to the payment of court fees which provided for strike out of the claim in the event of defaulIn Decadent the relevant breach which triggered the operation of CPR r 3.9 was the claimant's failure to comply with an unless order relating to the payment of court fees which provided for strike out of the claim in the event of defaulin the event of default.

In fact, the courts and the defence bar have in the past been critical of the Crown for not having a robust system of «file ownership,» where the rights of the accused have been breached precisely because serious cases got passed from Crown to Crown in order to accommodate competing commitmentIn fact, the courts and the defence bar have in the past been critical of the Crown for not having a robust system of «file ownership,» where the rights of the accused have been breached precisely because serious cases got passed from Crown to Crown in order to accommodate competing commitmentin the past been critical of the Crown for not having a robust system of «file ownership,» where the rights of the accused have been breached precisely because serious cases got passed from Crown to Crown in order to accommodate competing commitmentin order to accommodate competing commitments.

As to what circumstances are likely to be relevant for this purpose, the Court of Appeal in Denton only referred to two in particular; the promptness of any application for relief and other past or current breaches of rules, practice directions and court orCourt of Appeal in Denton only referred to two in particular; the promptness of any application for relief and other past or current breaches of rules, practice directions and court orcourt orders.

In the past, the Italian Constitutional Court made clear that supra - national law should not prevail without any limitation, and that the application of international obligations could not have the effect to breach the fundamental principles of the constitutional order or the fundamental rights of the individuals (this is called the «counter-limit doctrine», developed for example in the «Granital case», Sentenza n. 170, 5 June 1984In the past, the Italian Constitutional Court made clear that supra - national law should not prevail without any limitation, and that the application of international obligations could not have the effect to breach the fundamental principles of the constitutional order or the fundamental rights of the individuals (this is called the «counter-limit doctrine», developed for example in the «Granital case», Sentenza n. 170, 5 June 1984in the «Granital case», Sentenza n. 170, 5 June 1984).

In Khrapunov v. JSC BTA Bank [2017] EWCA Civ 40, a unanimous Court of Appeal has ruled as strongly arguable a claim of a conspiracy to injure by unlawful means, where the unlawful means consist in a breach of a worldwide asset freezing order («WFO»In Khrapunov v. JSC BTA Bank [2017] EWCA Civ 40, a unanimous Court of Appeal has ruled as strongly arguable a claim of a conspiracy to injure by unlawful means, where the unlawful means consist in a breach of a worldwide asset freezing order («WFO»in a breach of a worldwide asset freezing order («WFO»).

Breaches of decorum during trials and hearings have been occurring at least since a judge first angrily banged his gavel and proclaimed «Order in the court!»

In Soil Instruments Ltd v Mr Robert King Mason, His Honour Judge Bird, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court, considered whether Mr King Mason should be committed to prison for alleged breaches of an Order made by Mrs Justice May on 26th July 2017, concerning the use of confidential information under a restrictive covenant.

The Supreme Court of Canada upheld the power of lower courts to order Charter damages, but allowed the City's appeal in part, stating that Charter damages should only be used in certain narrow circumstances where the Charter breach is significant, and where other remedies would fail to compensate the Plaintiff.

Represented public works contractor claiming unpaid retention, change order work, and fraud against school district and individual defendant, and defended contractor against breach of contract and false claims by district in three - week California state court jury trial.

She subsequently brought a claim against Lambeth in the County Court for breach of contract and argued that suspension was not reasonable or necessary in order for the investigation to take place.

Acting for a defendant to a claim for breach of fiduciary duty and receipt of secret profits brought by a large multinational company in which corresponding proceedings were issued in Latvia, Jersey and the BVI, including representing him in committal proceedings for alleged breach of a freezing order, including in cross-appeals to the Court of Appeal.

In BLH v. SCDSS issued today, the Court of Appeals overturned a trial court order granting class certification in an action stemming from alleged breaches of adoption assistance subsidy agreementIn BLH v. SCDSS issued today, the Court of Appeals overturned a trial court order granting class certification in an action stemming from alleged breaches of adoption assistance subsidy agreemCourt of Appeals overturned a trial court order granting class certification in an action stemming from alleged breaches of adoption assistance subsidy agreemcourt order granting class certification in an action stemming from alleged breaches of adoption assistance subsidy agreementin an action stemming from alleged breaches of adoption assistance subsidy agreements.

Stephen Smith is renowned for his work in civil fraud litigation (typically claims for breach of fiduciary duty, deceit and misrepresentation), especially in connection with freezing injunctions, asset tracing, disclosure orders, jurisdictional and forum disputes, sham trusts and committals to prison for contempt of court.

Participated in an appeal on behalf of a national, publicly - traded medical group to Florida's 1st District Court of Appeal, which affirmed an order compelling arbitration of an employed physician's breach of contract claims

An order for specific performance is a court order that requires a party who is in breach of a contract to perform what was promised in the contract.

In 2009, the ECJ delivered its infamous judgment in West Tankers (C - 185 / 07), holding that Brussels I precluded the courts of a member state making an order restraining a person from commencing or continuing proceedings in another member state on the grounds that such proceedings would be in breach of an arbitration agreemenIn 2009, the ECJ delivered its infamous judgment in West Tankers (C - 185 / 07), holding that Brussels I precluded the courts of a member state making an order restraining a person from commencing or continuing proceedings in another member state on the grounds that such proceedings would be in breach of an arbitration agreemenin West Tankers (C - 185 / 07), holding that Brussels I precluded the courts of a member state making an order restraining a person from commencing or continuing proceedings in another member state on the grounds that such proceedings would be in breach of an arbitration agreemenin another member state on the grounds that such proceedings would be in breach of an arbitration agreemenin breach of an arbitration agreement.

V v V (Contact: Implacable hostility)[2004] 2 FLR 851: a landmark case in which the High Court transferred residence to a father as a result of the mother's repeated breaches of contact orders

Other decisions, such as the Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Shah v. Xerox Canada Ltd., 13 found that it was not necessary to find a fundamental term of the employment contract had been breached in order to find that a constructive dismissal had occurred.

In the matter of Motley & Others v Shadwell Park Ltd, the Court of Appeal (Sharp LJ and Henderson LJ) considered whether Mr Justice Soole acted outside the ambit of his reasonable discretion in granting Shadwell Park Ltd relief from sanction following its failure to submit an appeal bundle and skeleton argument in breach of paragraph 6.3 of Practice Direction 52B and a subsequent unless order that resulted in the appeal being struck out and a 3 hour appeal hearing being lost In granting relief Mr Justice Soole found that the loss of the hearing was not as serious as a loss of a trial datIn the matter of Motley & Others v Shadwell Park Ltd, the Court of Appeal (Sharp LJ and Henderson LJ) considered whether Mr Justice Soole acted outside the ambit of his reasonable discretion in granting Shadwell Park Ltd relief from sanction following its failure to submit an appeal bundle and skeleton argument in breach of paragraph 6.3 of Practice Direction 52B and a subsequent unless order that resulted in the appeal being struck out and a 3 hour appeal hearing being lost In granting relief Mr Justice Soole found that the loss of the hearing was not as serious as a loss of a trial datin granting Shadwell Park Ltd relief from sanction following its failure to submit an appeal bundle and skeleton argument in breach of paragraph 6.3 of Practice Direction 52B and a subsequent unless order that resulted in the appeal being struck out and a 3 hour appeal hearing being lost In granting relief Mr Justice Soole found that the loss of the hearing was not as serious as a loss of a trial datin breach of paragraph 6.3 of Practice Direction 52B and a subsequent unless order that resulted in the appeal being struck out and a 3 hour appeal hearing being lost In granting relief Mr Justice Soole found that the loss of the hearing was not as serious as a loss of a trial datin the appeal being struck out and a 3 hour appeal hearing being lost In granting relief Mr Justice Soole found that the loss of the hearing was not as serious as a loss of a trial datIn granting relief Mr Justice Soole found that the loss of the hearing was not as serious as a loss of a trial date.

In addition, the Partridge case appears to be one of the few instances in which a court has ordered a party to pay compensation for breaching the Human Rights CodIn addition, the Partridge case appears to be one of the few instances in which a court has ordered a party to pay compensation for breaching the Human Rights Codin which a court has ordered a party to pay compensation for breaching the Human Rights Code.

I acknowledge and agree that violation of this Employee Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement by me may cause the Company irreparable harm, and therefore I agree that the Company will be entitled to seek extraordinary relief in court, including, but not limited to, temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions and permanent injunctions without the necessity of posting a bond or other security (or, where such a bond or security is required, I agree that a $ [NUMBER] bond will be adequate), in addition to and without prejudice to any other rights or remedies that the Company may have for a breach of this Employee Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement.

June 24, 2016 The Federal Court of Appeal releases its reasons for judgment allowing the Government of Canada's appeal of the July 27, 2015 certification in part, but upholding the July 27, 2015 certification order in respect of the causes of action for negligence and breach of confidence.